inst/unitTests/test_CubicAlgorithm.R

# A test suite for the functions implemented in the cubic algorithm

test_FindMaximumDValueProducesTheCorrectValue <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    experimentalResultStats <- c(1, 1, 1)
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats <- c(log(factorial(2)), log(factorial(1)), log(factorial(0)))
    checkEquals(CausalR:::FindMaximumDValue(predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats, logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats), 2)
    experimentalResultStats2 <- c(2, 1, 0)
    checkEquals(CausalR:::FindMaximumDValue(predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats2, logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats), 2)
}

test_FindApproximateValuesThatWillMaximiseDValueCalculatesOutputValuesCorrectly <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(7, 3, 1)
    experimentalDataStats <- c(4, 5, 2)
    values <- CausalR:::FindApproximateValuesThatWillMaximiseDValue(predictionListStats, experimentalDataStats)
    checkEquals(length(values), 4)
    checkEquals(values[1], (28/11))
    checkEquals(values[2], (35/11))
    checkEquals(values[3], (12/11))
    checkEquals(values[4], (15/11))
}

test_GetMaximumDValueFromTwoByTwoContingencyTableProducesTheCorrectDValue <- function() {
    twoByTwoContingencyTable <- c(1, 2, 0, 1)
    predictionListStats <- c(4, 3, 2)
    experimentalDataStats <- c(2, 3, 4)
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats <- lfactorial(predictionListStats)
    checkEquals(CausalR:::GetMaximumDValueFromTwoByTwoContingencyTable(twoByTwoContingencyTable, predictionListStats, experimentalDataStats, logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats), 
        72)
}

test_GetApproximateMaximumDValueFromTwoByTwoContingencyTableProducesTheCorrectDValue <- function() {
    n_pp <- 1
    n_pm <- 2
    n_mp <- 0
    n_mm <- 1
    predictionListStats <- c(4, 3, 2)
    experimentalDataStats <- c(2, 3, 4)
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats <- lfactorial(predictionListStats)
    checkEquals(CausalR:::GetApproximateMaximumDValueFromTwoByTwoContingencyTable(n_pp, n_pm, n_mp, n_mm, predictionListStats, experimentalDataStats, 
        logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats), 72)
}

test_GetAllPossibleRoundingCombinationsWithFourNonIntegerValues <- function() {
    vect <- c(4.2, 5.7, 2.3, 0.7)
    roundingCombinations <- CausalR:::GetAllPossibleRoundingCombinations(vect)
    checkEquals(nrow(roundingCombinations), 16)
    checkEquals(ncol(roundingCombinations), 4)
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[1, ], c(4, 5, 2, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[2, ], c(4, 5, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[3, ], c(4, 5, 3, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[4, ], c(4, 5, 3, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[5, ], c(4, 6, 2, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[6, ], c(4, 6, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[7, ], c(4, 6, 3, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[8, ], c(4, 6, 3, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[9, ], c(5, 5, 2, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[10, ], c(5, 5, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[11, ], c(5, 5, 3, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[12, ], c(5, 5, 3, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[13, ], c(5, 6, 2, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[14, ], c(5, 6, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[15, ], c(5, 6, 3, 0))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[16, ], c(5, 6, 3, 1))
}

test_GetAllPossibleRoundingCombinationsWithOneIntegerValue <- function() {
    vect <- c(4.2, 5.7, 2.3, 1)
    roundingCombinations <- CausalR:::GetAllPossibleRoundingCombinations(vect)
    checkEquals(nrow(roundingCombinations), 8)
    checkEquals(ncol(roundingCombinations), 4)
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[1, ], c(4, 5, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[2, ], c(4, 5, 3, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[3, ], c(4, 6, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[4, ], c(4, 6, 3, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[5, ], c(5, 5, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[6, ], c(5, 5, 3, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[7, ], c(5, 6, 2, 1))
    checkEquals(roundingCombinations[8, ], c(5, 6, 3, 1))
}

test_GetMaxDValueForAFamilyProducesTheCorrectDValue <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    experimentalResultStats <- c(1, 1, 1)
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats <- c(log(factorial(2)), log(factorial(1)), log(factorial(0)))
    checkEquals(CausalR:::GetMaxDValueForAFamily(2, 0, 1, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats, logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats), 2)
}

test_GetRowAndColumnSumValuesOutputsTheCorrectCombinations <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    experimentalResultStats <- c(1, 1, 1)
    possibleRowAndColumnSumValues <- CausalR:::GetRowAndColumnSumValues(predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)
    checkEquals(nrow(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues), 2)
    checkEquals(ncol(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues), 4)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[1, 1], 1)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[1, 2], 1)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[1, 3], 1)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[1, 4], 1)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[2, 1], 2)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[2, 2], 0)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[2, 3], 1)
    checkEquals(possibleRowAndColumnSumValues[2, 4], 1)
}


test_CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValidReturnsTrueForValidInput <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    experimentalResultStats <- c(1, 1, 1)
    rowAndColumnSumValues <- c(2, 0, 1, 1)
    checkTrue(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats))
}

test_CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValidReturnsFalseForInvalidInput <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    experimentalResultStats <- c(1, 1, 1)
    rowAndColumnSumValues1 <- c(0, 0, 1, 0)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues1, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues2 <- c(0, 0, 0, 0)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues2, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues3 <- c(1, 0, 0, 1)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues3, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues4 <- c(2, 0, 0, 2)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues4, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues5 <- c(0, 1, 0, 1)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues5, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues6 <- c(1, 1, 0, 2)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues6, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues7 <- c(2, 1, 0, 3)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues7, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues8 <- c(0, 0, 1, -1)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues8, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues9 <- c(1, 0, 1, 0)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues9, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues10 <- c(0, 1, 1, 0)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues10, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
    rowAndColumnSumValues10 <- c(2, 1, 1, -2)
    checkTrue(!(CausalR:::CheckRowAndColumnSumValuesAreValid(rowAndColumnSumValues10, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats)))
}

test_GetWeightsAboveHypothesisScoreAndTotalWeightsProducesCorrectDistributionTable <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    experimentalResultStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    epsilon = 1e-05
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats <- lfactorial(predictionListStats)
    hypothesisScore <- 1
    logDMax <- log(2)
    logepsDMax <- log(epsilon) + logDMax
    r_p <- 2
    r_m <- 1
    c_p <- 2
    # A 2x1 array containing the weight above the hypothesis score and the total weight
    weightAboveHypScoreAndTotalWeight <- CausalR:::GetWeightsAboveHypothesisScoreAndTotalWeights(r_p, r_m, c_p, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats, 
        logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats, hypothesisScore, logepsDMax, logDMax)
    checkEquals(weightAboveHypScoreAndTotalWeight[1], 0.5)
    checkEquals(weightAboveHypScoreAndTotalWeight[2], 1.5)
}

test_GetWeightsAboveHypothesisScoreAndTotalWeightsDoesntDoubleCountWhenNPlusPlusIsZero <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(0, 1, 1)
    experimentalDataStats <- c(1, 1, 0)
    epsilon = 1e-05
    r_p <- 0
    r_m <- 1
    c_p <- 1
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats <- lfactorial(predictionListStats)
    hypothesisScore <- 0
    logDMax <- 0
    logepsDMax <- log(epsilon) + logDMax
    weightAboveHypScoreAndTotalWeight <- CausalR:::GetWeightsAboveHypothesisScoreAndTotalWeights(r_p, r_m, c_p, predictionListStats, experimentalDataStats, 
        logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats, hypothesisScore, logepsDMax, logDMax)
    # There's only 1 element in the contingency table, a wrongly-predicted hypothesis, hence the score is -1, so it should contribute to the denominator
    # of the p-value but not the numerator.
    checkEquals(weightAboveHypScoreAndTotalWeight[1], 0)
    checkEquals(weightAboveHypScoreAndTotalWeight[2], 1)
}

test_CalculateSignificanceUsingCubicAlgorithmProducesExactAnswerWithSmallInputs <- function() {
    predictionListStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    experimentalResultStats <- c(2, 1, 0)
    epsilon = 1e-05
    pValue <- CausalR:::CalculateSignificanceUsingCubicAlgorithm(-1, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats, epsilon)
    checkEquals(pValue, 1)
    pValue2 <- CausalR:::CalculateSignificanceUsingCubicAlgorithm(3, predictionListStats, experimentalResultStats, epsilon)
    checkEquals(pValue2, (1/3))
}

test_CalculateSignificanceUsingCubicAlgorithmProducesApproximatelyCorrectAnswerWithLargeInputs <- function() {
    # Check that the answer from the cubic algorithm is within a certain tolerance of the answer obtained using the quartic algorithm whose answer is
    # exact.
    epsilon = 1e-05
    pValue3 <- CausalR:::CalculateSignificanceUsingCubicAlgorithm(5, c(10, 10, 20), c(10, 10, 20), epsilon)
    checkEqualsNumeric(pValue3, 0.08, tolerance = 1 * 10 - 3)
    pValue4 <- CausalR:::CalculateSignificanceUsingCubicAlgorithm(5, c(7, 7, 15), c(9, 3, 17), epsilon)
    checkEqualsNumeric(pValue4, 0.024, tolerance = 1 * 10 - 3)
}

test_CalculateWeightGivenValuesInThreeByThreeContingencyTableProducesTheCorrectOutput <- function() {
    threeByThreeContingencyTable <- c(1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1)
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats <- c(log(factorial(2)), log(factorial(3)), log(factorial(2)))
    checkEquals(CausalR:::CalculateWeightGivenValuesInThreeByThreeContingencyTable(threeByThreeContingencyTable, logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats), 
        24)
    threeByThreeContingencyTable2 <- c(1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1)
    logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats2 <- c(log(factorial(4)), log(factorial(3)), log(factorial(2)))
    checkEquals(CausalR:::CalculateWeightGivenValuesInThreeByThreeContingencyTable(threeByThreeContingencyTable2, logOfFactorialOfPredictionListStats2), 
        144)
} 

Try the CausalR package in your browser

Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.

CausalR documentation built on Nov. 8, 2020, 5:25 p.m.