Description Usage Arguments Details Value Author(s) References See Also Examples
View source: R/selectFeatures.R
Two methods are provided to identify features (peptides or proteins) that can be informative of missing patterns.
Method hvp
fits a linear model to peptide dropout rate (proportion of samples were peptide is missing)
against peptide abundance (average log2-intensity). Method emb
is a information theoretic approach to
identify missing patterns. It quantifies the heterogeneity (entropy) of missing patterns per
biological (experimental group). This is the default method.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | selectFeatures(
x,
method = c("ebm", "hvp"),
group,
n_features = 500,
suppress_plot = TRUE
)
|
x |
Numeric matrix giving log-intensity where missing values are denoted by NA. Rows are peptides, columns are samples. |
method |
character. What method should be used to find features? options include |
group |
character or factor vector specifying biological (experimental) group e.g. control, treatment, WT, KO |
n_features |
Numeric, number of features with high dropout rate. 500 by default. Applicable if |
suppress_plot |
Logical show plot of dropouts vs abundances. Default to TRUE. Applicable if |
In general, the presence of group-wise (structured) blocks of missing values,
where peptides are missing in one experimental group can indicate MNAR, whereas if
such patterns are absent (or missingness is uniform across the samples), peptides are likely MAR.
In the presence of MNAR, left-censored MNAR imputation methods should
be chosen. Two methods are provided to explore missing patterns: method=hvp
identifies top n_features
peptides with high average expression that also have high dropout rate, defined as the proportion of samples where
peptide is missing. Peptides with high (potentially) biological dropouts are marked in the hvp
column in the
output dataframe. This method does not use any information about experimental conditions (i.e. group).
Another approach to explore and quantify missing patterns is by looking at how homogeneous or heterogeneous
missing patterns are in each experimental group. This is done by computing entropy of distribution of observed values.
This is the default and recommended method for selectFeatures
. Entropy is reported in EBM
column
of the output. A NaN
EBM indicates peptide is missing at least in one experimental group. Features set to
TRUE
in msImpute_feature
column are the features selected by the selected method. Users are encouraged
to use the EBM metric to find informative features, hence why the group
argument is required.
A data frame with a logical column denoting the selected features
Soroor Hediyeh-zadeh
Hediyeh-zadeh, S., Webb, A. I., & Davis, M. J. (2020). MSImpute: Imputation of label-free mass spectrometry peptides by low-rank approximation. bioRxiv.
msImpute
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 | data(pxd007959)
group <- pxd007959$samples$group
y <- data.matrix(pxd007959$y)
y <- log2(y)
hdp <- selectFeatures(y, method="ebm", group = group)
# construct matrix M to capture missing entries
M <- ifelse(is.na(y),1,0)
M <- M[hdp$msImpute_feature,]
# plot a heatmap of missingness patterns for the selected peptides
require(ComplexHeatmap)
hm <- Heatmap(M,
column_title = "dropout pattern, columns ordered by dropout similarity",
name = "Intensity",
col = c("#8FBC8F", "#FFEFDB"),
show_row_names = FALSE,
show_column_names = TRUE,
cluster_rows = TRUE,
cluster_columns = TRUE,
show_column_dend = TRUE,
show_row_dend = FALSE,
row_names_gp = gpar(fontsize = 7),
column_names_gp = gpar(fontsize = 8),
heatmap_legend_param = list(#direction = "horizontal",
heatmap_legend_side = "bottom",
labels = c("observed","missing"),
legend_width = unit(6, "cm")),
)
hm <- draw(hm, heatmap_legend_side = "left")
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.