Nothing
###########################################################################
# Log-Log #
# #
# The logit and probit links are symmetric, because the probabilities #
# approach zero or one at the same rate. The log-log and complementary #
# log-log links are asymmetric. Complementary log-log links approach zero #
# slowly and one quickly. Log-log links approach zero quickly and one #
# slowly. Either the log-log or complementary log-log link will tend to #
# fit better than logistic and probit, and are frequently used when the #
# probability of an event is small or large. A mixture of the two links, #
# the log-log and complementary log-log is often used, where each link is #
# weighted. The reason that logit is so prevalent is because logistic #
# parameters can be interpreted as odds ratios. #
###########################################################################
loglog <- function(p)
{
if({any(p < 0)} || {any(p > 1)}) stop("p must be in [0,1].")
x <- log(-log(p))
return(x)
}
invloglog <- function(x)
{
p <- exp(-exp(x))
return(p)
}
cloglog <- function(p)
{
if({any(p < 0)} || {any(p > 1)}) stop("p must be in [0,1].")
x <- log(-log(1 - p))
return(x)
}
invcloglog <- function(x)
{
p <- 1 - exp(-exp(x))
return(p)
}
#End
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.