View source: R/MetaAnalyticSurvBin.R
MetaAnalyticSurvBin | R Documentation |
The function 'MetaAnalyticSurvBin()' fits the model for a binary surrogate and time-to-event true endpoint developed by Burzykowski et al. (2004) in the meta-analytic multiple-trial setting.
MetaAnalyticSurvBin(
data,
true,
trueind,
surrog,
trt,
center,
trial,
patientid,
adjustment
)
data |
A data frame with the correct columns (See Data Format). |
true |
Observed time-to-event (true endpoint). |
trueind |
Time-to-event indicator. |
surrog |
Binary surrogate endpoint, coded as 1 or 2. |
trt |
Treatment indicator, coded as 0 or 1. |
center |
Center indicator (equal to trial if there are no different centers). This is the unit for which specific treatment effects are estimated. |
trial |
Trial indicator. This is the unit for which common baselines are to be used. |
patientid |
Patient indicator. |
adjustment |
The adjustment that should be made for the trial-level surrogacy, either "unadjusted", "weighted" or "adjusted" |
Returns an object of class "MetaAnalyticSurvBin" that can be used to evaluate surrogacy and contains the following elements:
Indiv.Surrogacy: a data frame that contains the global odds ratio and 95% confidence interval to evaluate surrogacy at the individual level.
Trial.R2: a data frame that contains the R^2_{trial}
and 95% confidence interval to evaluate surrogacy at the trial level.
EstTreatEffects: a data frame that contains the estimated treatment effects and sample size for each trial.
nlm.output: output of the maximization procedure (nlm) to maximize the likelihood function.
In the model developed by Burzykowski et al. (2004), a copula-based model is used for the true endpoint and a latent continuous variable, underlying the surrogate endpoint.
More specifically, the Plackett copula is used. The marginal model for the surrogate endpoint is a logistic regression model. For the true endpoint, the proportional hazard model is used.
The quality of the surrogate at the individual level can be evaluated by using the copula parameter \Theta
, which takes the form of a global odds ratio.
The quality of the surrogate at the trial level can be evaluated by considering the R^2_{trial}
between the estimated treatment effects.
The data frame must contains the following columns:
a column with the observed time-to-event (true endpoint)
a column with the time-to-event indicator: 1 if the event is observed, 0 otherwise
a column with the binary surrogate endpoint: 1 or 2
a column with the treatment indicator: 0 or 1
a column with the trial indicator
a column with the center indicator. If there are no different centers within each trial, the center indicator can be equal to the trial indicator
a column with the patient indicator
Dries De Witte
Burzykowski, T., Molenberghs, G., & Buyse, M. (2004). The validation of surrogate end points by using data from randomized clinical trials: a case-study in advanced colorectal cancer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 167(1), 103-124.
## Not run:
data("colorectal")
fit_bin <- MetaAnalyticSurvBin(data = colorectal, true = surv, trueind = SURVIND,
surrog = responder, trt = TREAT, center = CENTER,
trial = TRIAL, patientid = patientid,
adjustment="unadjusted")
print(fit_bin)
summary(fit_bin)
plot(fit_bin)
## End(Not run)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.