diabetes: Systematic review which compares the accuracy of HbA1c vs FPG...

In bamdit: Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Data

Systematic review which compares the accuracy of HbA1c vs FPG in diabetes

Description

This data frame contains results of diagnostic accuracy of 38 studies which reported comparison of sensitivity and specificity between HbA1c vs FPG in a population based screening for type 2 diabetes.

Format

A data frame with 38 rows and 9 columns. Each row represents study results, the columns are:

Study

Name of the first author.

TP_HbA1c

Number of true positive cases for HbA1c.

FP_HbA1c

Number of false positive cases for HbA1c.

FN_HbA1c

Number of false negative cases for HbA1c.

TN_HbA1c

Number of true negative cases for HbA1c.

TP_FPG

Number of true positive cases for FPG.

FP_FPG

Number of false positive cases for FPG.

FN_FPG

Number of false negative cases for FPG.

TN_FPG

Number of true negative cases for FPG.

Details

This data frame contains results of diagnostic accuraccy of 38 studies which reported comparison of sensitivity and specificity between HbA1c vs FPG in a population-based screening for type 2 diabetes.

Source

Hoyer, A., Kuss, O. Meta-analysis for the comparison of two disgnostic test: a new approach based on copulas. Stat. Med. 2018; 37:739-748

bamdit documentation built on Sept. 30, 2024, 9:36 a.m.