rapt: Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute...

In bamdit: Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Data

Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute abdominal pain

Description

This data frame corresponds to 13 clinical studies reporting the accuracy of doctors added with decision tools.

Format

A data frame with 13 rows and 13 columns. Each row represents study results, the columns are:

Author

Name of the first author and year of publication

tp.dr

Number of true positive cases for unadded doctors.

fp.dr

Number of false positive cases for unadded doctors.

fn.dr

Number of false negative cases for unadded doctors.

tn.dr

Number of true negative cases for unadded doctors.

tp.tools

Number of true positive cases for doctors with decision tools.

fp.tools

Number of false positive cases for doctors with decision tools.

fn.tools

Number of false negative cases for doctors with decision tools.

tn.tools

Number of true negative cases for doctors with decision tools.

tool

Diagnostic tool.

n.dr

Total number of cases for unadded doctors.

n.tools

Total number of cases for doctors with decision tools.

design

Study design.

Details

This data frame contains results of diagnostic accuraccy of 13 studies which reported comparison of sensitivity and specificity between doctors using diagnostic tools vs doctors without decision tools.

Source

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(47):1-167, iii-iv. Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute abdominal pain. Liu JL1, Wyatt JC, Deeks JJ, Clamp S, Keen J, Verde P, Ohmann C, Wellwood J, Dawes M, Altman DG.

References

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(47):1-167, iii-iv. Systematic reviews of clinical decision tools for acute abdominal pain. Liu JL1, Wyatt JC, Deeks JJ, Clamp S, Keen J, Verde P, Ohmann C, Wellwood J, Dawes M, Altman DG.

bamdit documentation built on Sept. 30, 2024, 9:36 a.m.