View source: R/weighted_posteriors.R
weighted_posteriors | R Documentation |
Extract posterior samples of parameters, weighted across models. Weighting is
done by comparing posterior model probabilities, via bayesfactor_models()
.
weighted_posteriors(..., prior_odds = NULL, missing = 0, verbose = TRUE)
## S3 method for class 'data.frame'
weighted_posteriors(..., prior_odds = NULL, missing = 0, verbose = TRUE)
## S3 method for class 'stanreg'
weighted_posteriors(
...,
prior_odds = NULL,
missing = 0,
verbose = TRUE,
effects = c("fixed", "random", "all"),
component = c("conditional", "zi", "zero_inflated", "all"),
parameters = NULL
)
## S3 method for class 'brmsfit'
weighted_posteriors(
...,
prior_odds = NULL,
missing = 0,
verbose = TRUE,
effects = c("fixed", "random", "all"),
component = c("conditional", "zi", "zero_inflated", "all"),
parameters = NULL
)
## S3 method for class 'blavaan'
weighted_posteriors(
...,
prior_odds = NULL,
missing = 0,
verbose = TRUE,
effects = c("fixed", "random", "all"),
component = c("conditional", "zi", "zero_inflated", "all"),
parameters = NULL
)
## S3 method for class 'BFBayesFactor'
weighted_posteriors(
...,
prior_odds = NULL,
missing = 0,
verbose = TRUE,
iterations = 4000
)
... |
Fitted models (see details), all fit on the same data, or a single
|
prior_odds |
Optional vector of prior odds for the models compared to
the first model (or the denominator, for |
missing |
An optional numeric value to use if a model does not contain a parameter that appears in other models. Defaults to 0. |
verbose |
Toggle off warnings. |
effects |
Should results for fixed effects, random effects or both be returned? Only applies to mixed models. May be abbreviated. |
component |
Should results for all parameters, parameters for the conditional model or the zero-inflated part of the model be returned? May be abbreviated. Only applies to brms-models. |
parameters |
Regular expression pattern that describes the parameters
that should be returned. Meta-parameters (like |
iterations |
For |
Note that across models some parameters might play different roles. For
example, the parameter A
plays a different role in the model Y ~ A + B
(where it is a main effect) than it does in the model Y ~ A + B + A:B
(where it is a simple effect). In many cases centering of predictors (mean
subtracting for continuous variables, and effects coding via contr.sum
or
orthonormal coding via contr.equalprior_pairs
for factors) can reduce this
issue. In any case you should be mindful of this issue.
See bayesfactor_models()
details for more info on passed models.
Note that for BayesFactor
models, posterior samples cannot be generated
from intercept only models.
This function is similar in function to brms::posterior_average
.
A data frame with posterior distributions (weighted across models) .
For BayesFactor < 0.9.12-4.3
, in some instances there might be
some problems of duplicate columns of random effects in the resulting data
frame.
Clyde, M., Desimone, H., & Parmigiani, G. (1996). Prediction via orthogonalized model mixing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(435), 1197-1208.
Hinne, M., Gronau, Q. F., van den Bergh, D., and Wagenmakers, E. (2019, March 25). A conceptual introduction to Bayesian Model Averaging. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.31234/osf.io/wgb64")}
Rouder, J. N., Haaf, J. M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology, part IV: Parameter estimation and Bayes factors. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25(1), 102-113.
van den Bergh, D., Haaf, J. M., Ly, A., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2019). A cautionary note on estimating effect size.
bayesfactor_inclusion()
for Bayesian model averaging.
if (require("rstanarm") && require("see") && interactive()) {
stan_m0 <- suppressWarnings(stan_glm(extra ~ 1,
data = sleep,
family = gaussian(),
refresh = 0,
diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df0.csv")
))
stan_m1 <- suppressWarnings(stan_glm(extra ~ group,
data = sleep,
family = gaussian(),
refresh = 0,
diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df1.csv")
))
res <- weighted_posteriors(stan_m0, stan_m1, verbose = FALSE)
plot(eti(res))
}
## With BayesFactor
if (require("BayesFactor")) {
extra_sleep <- ttestBF(formula = extra ~ group, data = sleep)
wp <- weighted_posteriors(extra_sleep, verbose = FALSE)
describe_posterior(extra_sleep, test = NULL, verbose = FALSE)
# also considers the null
describe_posterior(wp$delta, test = NULL, verbose = FALSE)
}
## weighted prediction distributions via data.frames
if (require("rstanarm") && interactive()) {
m0 <- suppressWarnings(stan_glm(
mpg ~ 1,
data = mtcars,
family = gaussian(),
diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df0.csv"),
refresh = 0
))
m1 <- suppressWarnings(stan_glm(
mpg ~ carb,
data = mtcars,
family = gaussian(),
diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df1.csv"),
refresh = 0
))
# Predictions:
pred_m0 <- data.frame(posterior_predict(m0))
pred_m1 <- data.frame(posterior_predict(m1))
BFmods <- bayesfactor_models(m0, m1, verbose = FALSE)
wp <- weighted_posteriors(
pred_m0, pred_m1,
prior_odds = as.numeric(BFmods)[2],
verbose = FALSE
)
# look at first 5 prediction intervals
hdi(pred_m0[1:5])
hdi(pred_m1[1:5])
hdi(wp[1:5]) # between, but closer to pred_m1
}
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.