row_count_match: Does the row count match that of a different table?

In pointblank: Data Validation and Organization of Metadata for Local and Remote Tables

Does the row count match that of a different table?

Description

The row_count_match() validation function, the expect_row_count_match() expectation function, and the test_row_count_match() test function all check whether the row count in the target table matches that of a comparison table. The validation function can be used directly on a data table or with an agent object (technically, a ptblank_agent object) whereas the expectation and test functions can only be used with a data table. As a validation step or as an expectation, there is a single test unit that hinges on whether the row counts for the two tables are the same (after any preconditions have been applied).

Usage

row_count_match(
  x,
  count,
  preconditions = NULL,
  segments = NULL,
  actions = NULL,
  step_id = NULL,
  label = NULL,
  brief = NULL,
  active = TRUE,
  tbl_compare = NULL
)

expect_row_count_match(
  object,
  count,
  preconditions = NULL,
  threshold = 1,
  tbl_compare = NULL
)

test_row_count_match(
  object,
  count,
  preconditions = NULL,
  threshold = 1,
  tbl_compare = NULL
)

Arguments

x	A pointblank agent or a data table ⁠obj:<ptblank_agent>|obj:<tbl_*>⁠ // required A data frame, tibble (tbl_df or tbl_dbi), Spark DataFrame (tbl_spark), or, an agent object of class ptblank_agent that is commonly created with create_agent().
count	The count comparison ⁠scalar<numeric|integer>|obj:<tbl_*>⁠ // required Either a literal value for the number of rows, or, a table to compare against the target table in terms of row count values. If supplying a comparison table, it can either be a table object such as a data frame, a tibble, a tbl_dbi object, or a tbl_spark object. Alternatively, a table-prep formula (⁠~ <tbl reading code>⁠) or a function (⁠function() <tbl reading code>⁠) can be used to lazily read in the comparison table at interrogation time.
preconditions	Input table modification prior to validation ⁠<table mutation expression>⁠ // default: NULL (optional) An optional expression for mutating the input table before proceeding with the validation. This can either be provided as a one-sided R formula using a leading ~ (e.g., ~ . %>% dplyr::mutate(col = col + 10) or as a function (e.g., function(x) dplyr::mutate(x, col = col + 10). See the Preconditions section for more information.
segments	Expressions for segmenting the target table ⁠<segmentation expressions>⁠ // default: NULL (optional) An optional expression or set of expressions (held in a list) that serve to segment the target table by column values. Each expression can be given in one of two ways: (1) as column names, or (2) as a two-sided formula where the LHS holds a column name and the RHS contains the column values to segment on. See the Segments section for more details on this.
actions	Thresholds and actions for different states ⁠obj:<action_levels>⁠ // default: NULL (optional) A list containing threshold levels so that the validation step can react accordingly when exceeding the set levels for different states. This is to be created with the action_levels() helper function.
step_id	Manual setting of the step ID value ⁠scalar<character>⁠ // default: NULL (optional) One or more optional identifiers for the single or multiple validation steps generated from calling a validation function. The use of step IDs serves to distinguish validation steps from each other and provide an opportunity for supplying a more meaningful label compared to the step index. By default this is NULL, and pointblank will automatically generate the step ID value (based on the step index) in this case. One or more values can be provided, and the exact number of ID values should (1) match the number of validation steps that the validation function call will produce (influenced by the number of columns provided), (2) be an ID string not used in any previous validation step, and (3) be a vector with unique values.
label	Optional label for the validation step ⁠vector<character>⁠ // default: NULL (optional) Optional label for the validation step. This label appears in the agent report and, for the best appearance, it should be kept quite short. See the Labels section for more information.
brief	Brief description for the validation step ⁠scalar<character>⁠ // default: NULL (optional) A brief is a short, text-based description for the validation step. If nothing is provided here then an autobrief is generated by the agent, using the language provided in create_agent()'s lang argument (which defaults to "en" or English). The autobrief incorporates details of the validation step so it's often the preferred option in most cases (where a label might be better suited to succinctly describe the validation).
active	Is the validation step active? ⁠scalar<logical>⁠ // default: TRUE A logical value indicating whether the validation step should be active. If the validation function is working with an agent, FALSE will make the validation step inactive (still reporting its presence and keeping indexes for the steps unchanged). If the validation function will be operating directly on data (no agent involvement), then any step with active = FALSE will simply pass the data through with no validation whatsoever. Aside from a logical vector, a one-sided R formula using a leading ~ can be used with . (serving as the input data table) to evaluate to a single logical value. With this approach, the pointblank function has_columns() can be used to determine whether to make a validation step active on the basis of one or more columns existing in the table (e.g., ~ . %>% has_columns(c(d, e))).
tbl_compare	Deprecated Comparison table ⁠obj:<tbl_*>⁠ // default: NULL (optional) The tbl_compare argument is deprecated. Instead, use count.
object	A data table for expectations or tests ⁠obj:<tbl_*>⁠ // required A data frame, tibble (tbl_df or tbl_dbi), or Spark DataFrame (tbl_spark) that serves as the target table for the expectation function or the test function.
threshold	The failure threshold scalar<integer|numeric>(val>=0) // default: 1 A simple failure threshold value for use with the expectation (expect_) and the test (test_) function variants. By default, this is set to 1 meaning that any single unit of failure in data validation results in an overall test failure. Whole numbers beyond 1 indicate that any failing units up to that absolute threshold value will result in a succeeding testthat test or evaluate to TRUE. Likewise, fractional values (between 0 and 1) act as a proportional failure threshold, where 0.15 means that 15 percent of failing test units results in an overall test failure.

Value

For the validation function, the return value is either a ptblank_agent object or a table object (depending on whether an agent object or a table was passed to x). The expectation function invisibly returns its input but, in the context of testing data, the function is called primarily for its potential side-effects (e.g., signaling failure). The test function returns a logical value.

Supported Input Tables

The types of data tables that are officially supported are:

• data frames (data.frame) and tibbles (tbl_df)

• Spark DataFrames (tbl_spark)

• the following database tables (tbl_dbi):

  • PostgreSQL tables (using the RPostgres::Postgres() as driver)

  • MySQL tables (with RMySQL::MySQL())

  • Microsoft SQL Server tables (via odbc)

  • BigQuery tables (using bigrquery::bigquery())

  • DuckDB tables (through duckdb::duckdb())

  • SQLite (with RSQLite::SQLite())

Other database tables may work to varying degrees but they haven't been formally tested (so be mindful of this when using unsupported backends with pointblank).

Preconditions

Providing expressions as preconditions means pointblank will preprocess the target table during interrogation as a preparatory step. It might happen that this particular validation requires some operation on the target table before the row count comparison takes place. Using preconditions can be useful at times since since we can develop a large validation plan with a single target table and make minor adjustments to it, as needed, along the way.

The table mutation is totally isolated in scope to the validation step(s) where preconditions is used. Using dplyr code is suggested here since the statements can be translated to SQL if necessary (i.e., if the target table resides in a database). The code is most easily supplied as a one-sided R formula (using a leading ~). In the formula representation, the . serves as the input data table to be transformed. Alternatively, a function could instead be supplied.

Segments

By using the segments argument, it's possible to define a particular validation with segments (or row slices) of the target table. An optional expression or set of expressions that serve to segment the target table by column values. Each expression can be given in one of two ways: (1) as column names, or (2) as a two-sided formula where the LHS holds a column name and the RHS contains the column values to segment on.

As an example of the first type of expression that can be used, vars(a_column) will segment the target table in however many unique values are present in the column called a_column. This is great if every unique value in a particular column (like different locations, or different dates) requires it's own repeating validation.

With a formula, we can be more selective with which column values should be used for segmentation. Using a_column ~ c("group_1", "group_2") will attempt to obtain two segments where one is a slice of data where the value "group_1" exists in the column named "a_column", and, the other is a slice where "group_2" exists in the same column. Each group of rows resolved from the formula will result in a separate validation step.

Segmentation will always occur after preconditions (i.e., statements that mutate the target table), if any, are applied. With this type of one-two combo, it's possible to generate labels for segmentation using an expression for preconditions and refer to those labels in segments without having to generate a separate version of the target table.

Actions

Often, we will want to specify actions for the validation. This argument, present in every validation function, takes a specially-crafted list object that is best produced by the action_levels() function. Read that function's documentation for the lowdown on how to create reactions to above-threshold failure levels in validation. The basic gist is that you'll want at least a single threshold level (specified as either the fraction of test units failed, or, an absolute value), often using the warn_at argument. Using action_levels(warn_at = 1) or action_levels(stop_at = 1) are good choices depending on the situation (the first produces a warning, the other stop()s).

Labels

label may be a single string or a character vector that matches the number of expanded steps. label also supports {glue} syntax and exposes the following dynamic variables contextualized to the current step:

• "{.step}": The validation step name

• "{.seg_col}": The current segment's column name

• "{.seg_val}": The current segment's value/group

The glue context also supports ordinary expressions for further flexibility (e.g., "{toupper(.step)}") as long as they return a length-1 string.

Briefs

Want to describe this validation step in some detail? Keep in mind that this is only useful if x is an agent. If that's the case, brief the agent with some text that fits. Don't worry if you don't want to do it. The autobrief protocol is kicked in when brief = NULL and a simple brief will then be automatically generated.

YAML

A pointblank agent can be written to YAML with yaml_write() and the resulting YAML can be used to regenerate an agent (with yaml_read_agent()) or interrogate the target table (via yaml_agent_interrogate()). When row_count_match() is represented in YAML (under the top-level steps key as a list member), the syntax closely follows the signature of the validation function. Here is an example of how a complex call of row_count_match() as a validation step is expressed in R code and in the corresponding YAML representation.

R statement:

agent %>% 
  row_count_match(
    count = ~ file_tbl(
      file = from_github(
        file = "sj_all_revenue_large.rds",
        repo = "rich-iannone/intendo",
        subdir = "data-large"
        )
      ),
    preconditions = ~ . %>% dplyr::filter(a < 10),
    segments = b ~ c("group_1", "group_2"),
    actions = action_levels(warn_at = 0.1, stop_at = 0.2),
    label = "The `row_count_match()` step.",
    active = FALSE
  )

YAML representation:

steps:
- row_count_match:
    count: ~ file_tbl(
      file = from_github(
        file = "sj_all_revenue_large.rds",
        repo = "rich-iannone/intendo",
        subdir = "data-large"
        )
      )
    preconditions: ~. %>% dplyr::filter(a < 10)
    segments: b ~ c("group_1", "group_2")
    actions:
      warn_fraction: 0.1
      stop_fraction: 0.2
    label: The `row_count_match()` step.
    active: false

In practice, both of these will often be shorter. Arguments with default values won't be written to YAML when using yaml_write() (though it is acceptable to include them with their default when generating the YAML by other means). It is also possible to preview the transformation of an agent to YAML without any writing to disk by using the yaml_agent_string() function.

Examples

Create a simple table with three columns and four rows of values.

tbl <-
  dplyr::tibble(
    a = c(5, 7, 6, 5),
    b = c(7, 1, 0, 0),
    c = c(1, 1, 1, 3)
  )

tbl
#> # A tibble: 4 x 3
#>       a     b     c
#>   <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1     5     7     1
#> 2     7     1     1
#> 3     6     0     1
#> 4     5     0     3

Create a second table which is quite different but has the same number of rows as tbl.

tbl_2 <-
  dplyr::tibble(
    e = c("a", NA, "a", "c"),
    f = c(2.6, 1.2, 0, NA)
  )

tbl_2
#> # A tibble: 4 x 2
#>   e         f
#>   <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 a       2.6
#> 2 <NA>    1.2
#> 3 a       0  
#> 4 c      NA

A: Using an agent with validation functions and then interrogate()

Validate that the count of rows in the target table (tbl) matches that of the comparison table (tbl_2).

agent <-
  create_agent(tbl = tbl) %>%
  row_count_match(count = tbl_2) %>%
  interrogate()

Printing the agent in the console shows the validation report in the Viewer. Here is an excerpt of validation report, showing the single entry that corresponds to the validation step demonstrated here.

B: Using the validation function directly on the data (no agent)

This way of using validation functions acts as a data filter. Data is passed through but should stop() if there is a single test unit failing. The behavior of side effects can be customized with the actions option.

tbl %>% row_count_match(count = tbl_2)
#> # A tibble: 4 x 3
#>       a     b     c
#>   <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1     5     7     1
#> 2     7     1     1
#> 3     6     0     1
#> 4     5     0     3

C: Using the expectation function

With the ⁠expect_*()⁠ form, we would typically perform one validation at a time. This is primarily used in testthat tests.

expect_row_count_match(tbl, count = tbl_2)

D: Using the test function

With the ⁠test_*()⁠ form, we should get a single logical value returned to us.

tbl %>% test_row_count_match(count = 4)
#> [1] TRUE

Function ID

2-31

See Also

Other validation functions: col_count_match(), col_exists(), col_is_character(), col_is_date(), col_is_factor(), col_is_integer(), col_is_logical(), col_is_numeric(), col_is_posix(), col_schema_match(), col_vals_between(), col_vals_decreasing(), col_vals_equal(), col_vals_expr(), col_vals_gt(), col_vals_gte(), col_vals_in_set(), col_vals_increasing(), col_vals_lt(), col_vals_lte(), col_vals_make_set(), col_vals_make_subset(), col_vals_not_between(), col_vals_not_equal(), col_vals_not_in_set(), col_vals_not_null(), col_vals_null(), col_vals_regex(), col_vals_within_spec(), conjointly(), rows_complete(), rows_distinct(), serially(), specially(), tbl_match()

pointblank documentation built on Oct. 30, 2024, 9:29 a.m.