Description Usage Arguments Details Value Methods (by class) Author(s) Examples
View source: R/correctly_predicted.R
correctly predicted outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | correctly_predicted(xdata, ...)
## Default S3 method:
correctly_predicted(xdata, ...)
## S3 method for class 'elo'
correctly_predicted(xdata, exclude_draws = TRUE, daterange = NULL, ...)
## S3 method for class 'fastelo'
correctly_predicted(xdata, ...)
## S3 method for class 'list'
correctly_predicted(xdata, ...)
## S3 method for class 'matrix'
correctly_predicted(xdata, ...)
|
xdata |
result from |
... |
additional arguments depending on the class of object you supplied |
exclude_draws |
logical, should draws be excluded from the calculation,
by default |
daterange |
character or Date of length two, which allows to restrict
the time range to be considered for |
If you provide results from elo.seq
or
fastelo
, this function first extracts the number of
interactions for which a winning expectation can be expressed, i.e. for all
interactions for which the winning probability for either individual is
different from 0.5. If the winning probability for both IDs is 0.5 then
either outcome is equally likely and hence it cannot be verified whether
the winning probability 'worked correctly'.
If you provide an interaction matrix, the order of columns in which it is supplied is taken as the order to be checked, i.e. this just calculates the proportion of interactions that are in upper triangle of the matrix.
If you provide a list with a rank order and an interaction matrix, the matrix will be 'reshuffled' according to the rank order and then all entries above the diagonal will be divided by the total number of interactions.
Note that there is one potential issue for the list-based method (rank order and interaction matrix supplied), which is that it can't accomodate tied ranks.
a list with two items where the first item is the proportion of correctly predicted outcomes and the second item is the total number of interactions for which the winning probability is not 0.5 (in the case of elo or fastelo) or the total number of interactions (in case of matrix or list)
default
: default method for logical vector
elo
: for usage with results of
elo.seq
fastelo
: for usage with results of
fastelo
list
: for usage with a list of order and
interaction matrix
matrix
: for usage with an interaction matrix
Christof Neumann
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 | data(adv)
res <- elo.seq(winner = adv$winner, loser = adv$loser, Date = adv$Date)
correctly_predicted(res)
correctly_predicted(res, daterange = c("2010-01-10", "2010-01-20"))
# only one interaction considered because for the first no expection was
# expressed (same starting values for both contestants)
correctly_predicted(res, daterange = c("2010-01-01", "2010-01-02"))
data("devries98")
correctly_predicted(list(colnames(devries98), devries98))
# is the same as
correctly_predicted(devries98)
# reversed order
correctly_predicted(list(rev(colnames(devries98)), devries98))
mat <- matrix(ncol = 10, nrow = 10, 0)
colnames(mat) <- rownames(mat) <- letters[1:10]
mat[upper.tri(mat)] <- 101
mat[lower.tri(mat)] <- 100
# correct order
order1 <- colnames(mat)
correctly_predicted(list(order1, mat))
# not very good
# the worst possible order for that matrix:
order2 <- rev(order1)
correctly_predicted(list(order2, mat))
# not much worse than order 1...
mat <- matrix(ncol = 10, nrow = 10, 0)
colnames(mat) <- rownames(mat) <- letters[1:10]
mat[upper.tri(mat)] <- 1
mat[1, 2] <- 100
# correct ranking
order1 <- letters[1:10]
correctly_predicted(xdata = list(order1, mat))
# almost correct order
order2 <- c("b", "a", letters[3:10])
correctly_predicted(xdata = list(order2, mat))
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.