dat.nielweise2008: Studies on Anti-Infective-Treated Central Venous Catheters...

In metadat: Meta-Analysis Datasets

Studies on Anti-Infective-Treated Central Venous Catheters for Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

Description

Results from 18 studies comparing the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection when using anti-infective-treated versus standard catheters for total parenteral nutrition or chemotherapy.

Usage

dat.nielweise2008

Format

The data frame contains the following columns:

study	numeric	study number
authors	character	study authors
year	numeric	publication year
x1i	numeric	number of CRBSIs in patients receiving an anti-infective catheter
t1i	numeric	total number of catheter days for patients receiving an anti-infective catheter
x2i	numeric	number of CRBSIs in patients receiving a standard catheter
t2i	numeric	total number of catheter days for patients receiving a standard catheter

Details

The use of a central venous catheter may lead to a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), which in turn increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Anti-infective-treated catheters have been developed that are meant to reduce the risk of CRBSIs. Niel-Weise et al. (2008) conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing infection risk when using anti-infective-treated versus standard catheters for total parenteral nutrition or chemotherapy. The results from 9 such studies are included in this dataset.

The dataset was used in the article by Stijnen et al. (2010) to illustrate various generalized linear mixed-effects models for the meta-analysis of incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (see ‘References’).

Concepts

medicine, incidence rates, generalized linear models

Author(s)

Wolfgang Viechtbauer, [e-mail], https://www.metafor-project.org

Source

Niel-Weise, B. S., Stijnen, T., & van den Broek, P. J. (2008). Anti-infective-treated central venous catheters for total parenteral nutrition or chemotherapy: A systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection, 69(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2008.02.020

References

Stijnen, T., Hamza, T. H., & Ozdemir, P. (2010). Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Statistics in Medicine, 29(29), 3046–3067. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4040

Examples

### copy data into 'dat' and examine data
dat <- dat.nielweise2008
dat

## Not run: 

### load metafor package
library(metafor)

### standard (inverse-variance) random-effects model
res <- rma(measure="IRR", x1i=x1i, t1i=t1i, x2i=x2i, t2i=t2i, data=dat)
print(res, digits=3)
predict(res, transf=exp, digits=2)

### random-effects conditional Poisson model
res <- rma.glmm(measure="IRR", x1i=x1i, t1i=t1i, x2i=x2i, t2i=t2i, data=dat, model="CM.EL")
print(res, digits=3)
predict(res, transf=exp, digits=2)


## End(Not run)

metadat documentation built on April 6, 2022, 5:08 p.m.