Nothing
# `lbfgsFactr` tests the objective reduction of a SINGLE step, not stationarity,
# so at the plain 10^-sigdig the analytic-gradient methods stopped as soon as one
# step was small -- 8.6 OFV units short on a 2-cmt oral fit, in 6 outer
# evaluations. The default is two orders tighter for that reason
# (plans/foceif-outer-opt-pgtol.md). Control-level checks only, so this stays in
# the push/PR subset; the fit-based check is in test-focei-factr-fit.R.
nmTest({
test_that("lbfgsFactr is two orders tighter than the other sigdig tolerances", {
.ctl <- foceiControl()
expect_equal(.ctl$lbfgsFactr, 10^(-.ctl$sigdig - 2) / .Machine$double.eps)
# the other sigdig-derived optimizer tolerances are NOT shifted -- nlminb's
# in particular, where tightening measured no benefit
expect_equal(.ctl$rel.tol, 10^(-.ctl$sigdig))
expect_equal(.ctl$x.tol, 10^(-.ctl$sigdig))
expect_equal(.ctl$rhoend, 10^(-.ctl$sigdig))
# and it tracks sigdig
expect_equal(foceiControl(sigdig = 5)$lbfgsFactr, 1e-7 / .Machine$double.eps)
# an explicit value still wins
expect_equal(foceiControl(lbfgsFactr = 1e7)$lbfgsFactr, 1e7)
})
})
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.