tests/testthat/_snaps/estimate_meta_d1.md

In rcalinjageman/esci: Estimation Statistics with Confidence Intervals

Tests for meta_d1

Code
  estimate
Output
  Analysis of raw data:

  -- es_meta --
    effect_label effect_size       LL       UL        SE k diamond_ratio
  1    My effect    2.450985 2.052157 2.849813 0.2034873 7      1.085254
    diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL I2 I2_LL I2_UL PI_LL PI_UL            p
  1                1         2.490043 NA    NA    NA    NA    NA 2.063193e-33
        width FE_effect_size RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
  1 0.7976557       2.450985       2.451144   0.7976557    0.865659

  -- es_heterogeneity --
    effect_label moderator_variable_name moderator_level       measure estimate
  1    My effect            My moderator         Overall Diamond Ratio 1.085254
    LL       UL
  1  1 2.490043
  [1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."


  Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.

Code
  estimate_d1
Output
  Analysis of raw data:

  -- es_meta --
    effect_label moderator_variable_name moderator_variable_level effect_size
  1    My effect                  subset                  Overall    2.450985
  2    My effect                  subset                      00s    2.256909
  3    My effect                  subset                      90s    2.718832
          LL       UL        SE k diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL
  1 2.052157 2.849813 0.2034873 7      1.085254                1         2.490043
  2 1.733156 2.780663 0.2672261 4      1.080164                1         3.924416
  3 2.103536 3.334128 0.3139324 3      1.073667                1         8.742721
    I2 I2_LL I2_UL PI_LL PI_UL            p     width FE_effect_size
  1 NA    NA    NA    NA    NA 2.063193e-33 0.7976557       2.450985
  2 NA    NA    NA    NA    NA 3.022513e-17 1.0475070       2.256909
  3 NA    NA    NA    NA    NA 4.694309e-18 1.2305925       2.718832
    RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
  1       2.451144   0.7976557    0.865659
  2       2.263560   1.0475070    1.131479
  3       2.706928   1.2305925    1.321246

  -- es_heterogeneity --
     effect_label moderator_variable_name moderator_level       measure estimate
  1     My effect                  subset         Overall Diamond Ratio 1.085254
  11    My effect                  subset             00s Diamond Ratio 1.080164
  12    My effect                  subset             90s Diamond Ratio 1.073667
     LL       UL
  1   1 2.490043
  11  1 3.924416
  12  1 8.742721
  [1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."

  -- es_meta_difference --
                   type effect_label moderator_variable_name moderator_level
  Comparison Comparison    My effect                  subset             90s
  Reference   Reference    My effect                  subset             00s
  Difference Difference    My effect                  subset       90s ‒ 00s
             effect_size         LL       UL        SE         p
  Comparison   2.7188322  2.1035360 3.334128 0.3139324 0.0000000
  Reference    2.2569090  1.7331555 2.780663 0.2672261 0.0000000
  Difference   0.4619232 -0.3461035 1.269950 0.4122661 0.2625224


  Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.

rcalinjageman/esci documentation built on Dec. 23, 2024, 2:37 p.m.