tests/testthat/_snaps/estimate_meta_mdiff_two.md
In rcalinjageman/esci: Estimation Statistics with Confidence Intervals
Compare meta_mdiff_two to ESCI_Original_two_groups
Code
estimate
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label effect_size LL
x.flip Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating 0.09431632 0.01498243
UL SE k diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL
x.flip 0.1736502 0.04047722 10 1.397517 1 2.66465
I2 I2_LL I2_UL PI_LL PI_UL p width
x.flip 34.93494 0 82.43217 -0.06646225 0.2550949 0.0198004 0.1586678
FE_effect_size RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
x.flip 0.06845248 0.09431632 0.1135355 0.1586678
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
H^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
I^2(%) Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
tau Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
tau^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397516897 1 2.6646505
H^2 Overall H^2 1.536923194 1 5.6922238
I^2(%) Overall I^2(%) 34.934939901 0 82.4321736
tau Overall tau 0.071349448 0 0.2109230
tau^2 Overall tau^2 0.005090744 0 0.0444885
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
Code
estimate_fe
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label effect_size LL UL
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating 0.06845248 0.01168473 0.1252202
SE k diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL I2 I2_LL I2_UL
1 0.02896367 10 1.397517 1 2.66465 NA NA NA
PI_LL PI_UL p width FE_effect_size RE_effect_size FE_CI_width
1 NA NA 0.01810854 0.1135355 0.06845248 0.09431632 0.1135355
RE_CI_width
1 0.1586678
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397517 1 2.66465
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
Code
estimate_mod
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
x.flip Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_variable_level effect_size LL UL SE k
x.flip Overall 0.09431632 0.01498243 0.1736502 0.04047722 10
1 Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315 0.3450130 0.06550118 4
2 Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464 0.0957286 0.03229224 6
diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL I2 I2_LL I2_UL
x.flip 1.397517 1 2.664650 34.93494 0 82.43217
1 1.000000 1 3.079149 0.00000 0 88.41460
2 1.000000 1 3.729327 14.90783 0 90.89257
PI_LL PI_UL p width FE_effect_size
x.flip -0.06646225 0.2550949 0.0198003989 0.1586678 0.06845248
1 0.08825315 0.3450130 0.0009419452 0.2567599 0.21663310
2 -0.03085464 0.0957286 0.3151461867 0.1466803 0.03243698
RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
x.flip 0.09431632 0.1135355 0.1586678
1 0.21663310 0.2567599 0.2567599
2 0.03243698 0.1265832 0.1265832
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
11 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
12 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
H^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
H^21 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
H^22 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
I^2(%) Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
I^2(%)1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
I^2(%)2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau^21 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau^22 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397516897 1 2.66465049
11 Critique Diamond Ratio 1.000000000 1 3.07914898
12 Simple Diamond Ratio 1.000000000 1 3.72932744
H^2 Overall H^2 1.536923194 1 5.69222383
H^21 Critique H^2 1.000000000 1 8.63155437
H^22 Simple H^2 1.175196315 1 10.98004513
I^2(%) Overall I^2(%) 34.934939901 0 82.43217360
I^2(%)1 Critique I^2(%) 0.000000000 0 88.41460116
I^2(%)2 Simple I^2(%) 14.907833952 0 90.89256931
tau Overall tau 0.071349448 0 0.21092298
tau1 Critique tau 0.000000000 0 0.37763163
tau2 Simple tau 0.036030451 0 0.27194023
tau^2 Overall tau^2 0.005090744 0 0.04448850
tau^21 Critique tau^2 0.000000000 0 0.14260565
tau^22 Simple tau^2 0.001298193 0 0.07395149
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
-- es_meta_difference --
type effect_label
Comparison Comparison Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Reference Reference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Difference Difference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
moderator_variable_name moderator_level effect_size LL
Comparison mod Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315
Reference mod Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464
Difference mod Critique ‒ Simple 0.18419611 0.04106247
UL SE p
Comparison 0.3450130 0.06550118 0.0009419452
Reference 0.0957286 0.03229224 0.3151461867
Difference 0.3273298 0.07302871 0.0116609301
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
Code
estimate_mod_fe
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
3 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_variable_level effect_size LL UL SE k
1 Overall 0.06845248 0.01168473 0.1252202 0.02896367 10
2 Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315 0.3450130 0.06550118 4
3 Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464 0.0957286 0.03229224 6
diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL I2 I2_LL I2_UL PI_LL PI_UL
1 1.397517 1 2.664650 NA NA NA NA NA
2 1.000000 1 3.079149 NA NA NA NA NA
3 1.000000 1 3.729327 NA NA NA NA NA
p width FE_effect_size RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
1 0.0181085442 0.1135355 0.06845248 0.09431632 0.1135355 0.1586678
2 0.0009419452 0.2567599 0.21663310 0.21663310 0.2567599 0.2567599
3 0.3151461867 0.1265832 0.03243698 0.03243698 0.1265832 0.1265832
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
11 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
12 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397517 1 2.664650
11 Critique Diamond Ratio 1.000000 1 3.079149
12 Simple Diamond Ratio 1.000000 1 3.729327
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
-- es_meta_difference --
type effect_label
Comparison Comparison Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Reference Reference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Difference Difference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
moderator_variable_name moderator_level effect_size LL
Comparison mod Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315
Reference mod Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464
Difference mod Critique ‒ Simple 0.18419611 0.04106247
UL SE p
Comparison 0.3450130 0.06550118 0.0009419452
Reference 0.0957286 0.03229224 0.3151461867
Difference 0.3273298 0.07302871 0.0116609301
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
rcalinjageman/esci documentation built on Dec. 23, 2024, 2:37 p.m.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Compare meta_mdiff_two to ESCI_Original_two_groups
Code
estimate
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label effect_size LL
x.flip Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating 0.09431632 0.01498243
UL SE k diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL
x.flip 0.1736502 0.04047722 10 1.397517 1 2.66465
I2 I2_LL I2_UL PI_LL PI_UL p width
x.flip 34.93494 0 82.43217 -0.06646225 0.2550949 0.0198004 0.1586678
FE_effect_size RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
x.flip 0.06845248 0.09431632 0.1135355 0.1586678
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
H^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
I^2(%) Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
tau Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
tau^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397516897 1 2.6646505
H^2 Overall H^2 1.536923194 1 5.6922238
I^2(%) Overall I^2(%) 34.934939901 0 82.4321736
tau Overall tau 0.071349448 0 0.2109230
tau^2 Overall tau^2 0.005090744 0 0.0444885
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
Code
estimate_fe
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label effect_size LL UL
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating 0.06845248 0.01168473 0.1252202
SE k diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL I2 I2_LL I2_UL
1 0.02896367 10 1.397517 1 2.66465 NA NA NA
PI_LL PI_UL p width FE_effect_size RE_effect_size FE_CI_width
1 NA NA 0.01810854 0.1135355 0.06845248 0.09431632 0.1135355
RE_CI_width
1 0.1586678
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating My moderator
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397517 1 2.66465
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
Code
estimate_mod
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
x.flip Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_variable_level effect_size LL UL SE k
x.flip Overall 0.09431632 0.01498243 0.1736502 0.04047722 10
1 Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315 0.3450130 0.06550118 4
2 Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464 0.0957286 0.03229224 6
diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL I2 I2_LL I2_UL
x.flip 1.397517 1 2.664650 34.93494 0 82.43217
1 1.000000 1 3.079149 0.00000 0 88.41460
2 1.000000 1 3.729327 14.90783 0 90.89257
PI_LL PI_UL p width FE_effect_size
x.flip -0.06646225 0.2550949 0.0198003989 0.1586678 0.06845248
1 0.08825315 0.3450130 0.0009419452 0.2567599 0.21663310
2 -0.03085464 0.0957286 0.3151461867 0.1466803 0.03243698
RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
x.flip 0.09431632 0.1135355 0.1586678
1 0.21663310 0.2567599 0.2567599
2 0.03243698 0.1265832 0.1265832
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
11 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
12 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
H^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
H^21 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
H^22 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
I^2(%) Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
I^2(%)1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
I^2(%)2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau^2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau^21 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
tau^22 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397516897 1 2.66465049
11 Critique Diamond Ratio 1.000000000 1 3.07914898
12 Simple Diamond Ratio 1.000000000 1 3.72932744
H^2 Overall H^2 1.536923194 1 5.69222383
H^21 Critique H^2 1.000000000 1 8.63155437
H^22 Simple H^2 1.175196315 1 10.98004513
I^2(%) Overall I^2(%) 34.934939901 0 82.43217360
I^2(%)1 Critique I^2(%) 0.000000000 0 88.41460116
I^2(%)2 Simple I^2(%) 14.907833952 0 90.89256931
tau Overall tau 0.071349448 0 0.21092298
tau1 Critique tau 0.000000000 0 0.37763163
tau2 Simple tau 0.036030451 0 0.27194023
tau^2 Overall tau^2 0.005090744 0 0.04448850
tau^21 Critique tau^2 0.000000000 0 0.14260565
tau^22 Simple tau^2 0.001298193 0 0.07395149
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
-- es_meta_difference --
type effect_label
Comparison Comparison Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Reference Reference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Difference Difference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
moderator_variable_name moderator_level effect_size LL
Comparison mod Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315
Reference mod Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464
Difference mod Critique ‒ Simple 0.18419611 0.04106247
UL SE p
Comparison 0.3450130 0.06550118 0.0009419452
Reference 0.0957286 0.03229224 0.3151461867
Difference 0.3273298 0.07302871 0.0116609301
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
Code
estimate_mod_fe
Output
Analysis of raw data:
-- es_meta --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
2 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
3 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_variable_level effect_size LL UL SE k
1 Overall 0.06845248 0.01168473 0.1252202 0.02896367 10
2 Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315 0.3450130 0.06550118 4
3 Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464 0.0957286 0.03229224 6
diamond_ratio diamond_ratio_LL diamond_ratio_UL I2 I2_LL I2_UL PI_LL PI_UL
1 1.397517 1 2.664650 NA NA NA NA NA
2 1.000000 1 3.079149 NA NA NA NA NA
3 1.000000 1 3.729327 NA NA NA NA NA
p width FE_effect_size RE_effect_size FE_CI_width RE_CI_width
1 0.0181085442 0.1135355 0.06845248 0.09431632 0.1135355 0.1586678
2 0.0009419452 0.2567599 0.21663310 0.21663310 0.2567599 0.2567599
3 0.3151461867 0.1265832 0.03243698 0.03243698 0.1265832 0.1265832
-- es_heterogeneity --
effect_label moderator_variable_name
1 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
11 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
12 Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating mod
moderator_level measure estimate LL UL
1 Overall Diamond Ratio 1.397517 1 2.664650
11 Critique Diamond Ratio 1.000000 1 3.079149
12 Simple Diamond Ratio 1.000000 1 3.729327
[1] "As of version 1.0.2 esci has implemented an improved method for calculating the CI for the diamond ratio; these will no longer match those presented in the 2nd edition of <i>Introduction to the New Statistics</i>."
-- es_meta_difference --
type effect_label
Comparison Comparison Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Reference Reference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
Difference Difference Brain Photo Rating - No Brain Photo Rating
moderator_variable_name moderator_level effect_size LL
Comparison mod Critique 0.21663310 0.08825315
Reference mod Simple 0.03243698 -0.03085464
Difference mod Critique ‒ Simple 0.18419611 0.04106247
UL SE p
Comparison 0.3450130 0.06550118 0.0009419452
Reference 0.0957286 0.03229224 0.3151461867
Difference 0.3273298 0.07302871 0.0116609301
Note: LL and UL are lower and upper boundaries of confidence intervals with 95% expected coverage.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Embedding an R snippet on your website
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.