Description Usage Arguments Details Value Author(s) References See Also Examples
This function calculates the ‘empiric’ power of 2-stage BE studies according to Potvin et al. via simulations. The Potvin methods are modified to include a futility criterion Nmax and to allow the sample size estimation step to be done with the point estimate (PE) and MSE (calculated from CV) of stage 1.
1 2 3 4 |
method |
Decision schemes according to Potvin et.al. (defaults to |
alpha0 |
Alpha value for the first step(s) in Potvin |
alpha |
Vector (two elements) of the nominal alphas for the two stages. Defaults to
Pocock’s setting |
n1 |
Sample size of stage 1. |
GMR |
Ratio T/R to be used in decision scheme (power calculations in stage 1 and sample size estimation for stage 2). |
CV |
Coefficient of variation of the intra-subject variability (use e.g., 0.3 for 30%). |
targetpower |
Power threshold in the power monitoring steps and power to achieve in the sample size estimation step. |
pmethod |
Power calculation method, also to be used in the sample size estimation for
stage 2. |
usePE |
If |
Nmax |
Futility criterion. If set to a finite value, all studies simulated in which a
sample size |
min.n2 |
Minimum sample size of stage 2. Defaults to zero. |
theta0 |
True ratio of T/R for simulating. Defaults to the |
theta1 |
Lower bioequivalence limit. Defaults to 0.8. |
theta2 |
Upper bioequivalence limit. Defaults to 1.25. |
npct |
Percentiles to be used for the presentation of the distribution of
|
nsims |
Number of studies to simulate. |
setseed |
Simulations are dependent on the starting point of the (pseudo) random number
generator. To avoid differences in power for different runs a
|
details |
If set to |
The calculations follow in principle the simulations as described in Potvin
et al.
The underlying subject data are assumed to be evaluated after log-transformation.
But instead of simulating subject data, the statistics pe1, mse1 and pe2, SS2 are
simulated via their associated distributions (normal and
χ2 distributions).
Returns an object of class "pwrtsd"
with all the input arguments and results
as components.
The class "pwrtsd"
" has an S3 print method.
The results are in the components:
pBE |
Fraction of studies found BE. |
pBE_s1 |
Fraction of studies found BE in stage 1. |
pct_s2 |
Percentage of studies continuing to stage 2. |
nmean |
Mean of n(total), aka average total sample size (ASN). |
nrange |
Range (min, max) of n(total). |
nperc |
Vector of percentiles of the distribution of n(total). |
ntable |
Object of class |
D. Labes
Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ, Smith RA. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.
Pharm Stat. 2008; 7(4):245–62. doi: 10.1002/pst.294
Montague TH, Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ. Additional results for ‘Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs’.
Pharm Stat. 2011; 11(1):8–13. doi: 10.1002/pst.483
Fuglsang A. Controlling type I errors for two-stage bioequivalence study designs.
Clin Res Reg Aff. 2011; 28(4):100–5. doi: 10.3109/10601333.2011.631547
Fuglsang A. Sequential Bioequivalence Trial Designs with Increased Power and
Controlled Type I Error Rates.
AAPS J. 2013; 15(3):659–61. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9475-5
Fuglsang A. Futility Rules in Bioequivalence Trials with Sequential Designs.
AAPS J. 2014; 16(1):79–82. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9540-0
Schütz H. Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 71(3):271–81. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1806-2
Kieser M, Rauch G. Two-stage designs for cross-over bioequivalence trials.
Stat Med. 2015; 34(16):2403–16. doi: 10.1002/sim.6487
Zheng Ch, Zhao L, Wang J. Modifications of sequential designs in bioequivalence trials.
Pharm Stat. 2015; 14(3):180–8. doi: 10.1002/pst.1672
power.tsd.p
for analogous calculations for 2-group parallel
design.
power.tsd.fC
for analogous calculations with futility check
based on point estimate of stage 1.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 | # using all the defaults and 24 subjects in stage 1, CV of 25%
power.tsd(n1=24, CV=0.25)
# computation time ~ 1 sec
#
# as above, but save results for further use
res <- power.tsd(n1=24, CV=0.25)
## Not run:
# representation of the discrete distribution of n(total)
# via plot method of object with class "table" which creates a
# 'needle' plot
plot(res$ntable/sum(res$ntable), ylab="Density",
xlab=expression("n"[total]), las=1,
main=expression("Distribution of n"[total]))
#
# If you prefer a histogram instead (IMHO, not the preferred plot):
# reconstruct the ntotal values from the ntable
ntot <- rep.int(as.integer(names(res$ntable)),
times=as.integer(res$ntable))
# annotated histogram
hist(ntot, freq=FALSE, breaks=res$nrange[2]-res$nrange[1],
xlab=expression("n"[total]), las=1,
main=expression("Histogram of n"[total]))
abline(v=c(res$nmean, res$nperc[["50%"]]), lty=c(1, 3))
legend("topright", box.lty=0, legend=c("mean", "median"),
lty=c(1, 3), cex=0.9)
## End(Not run)
|
TSD with 2x2 crossover
Method B: alpha (s1/s2) = 0.0294 0.0294
Target power in power monitoring and sample size est. = 0.8
Power calculation via non-central t approx.
CV1 and GMR = 0.95 in sample size est. used
No futility criterion
BE acceptance range = 0.8 ... 1.25
CV = 0.25; n(stage 1) = 24; GMR = 0.95
1e+05 sims at theta0 = 0.95 (p(BE) = 'power').
p(BE) = 0.84244
p(BE) s1 = 0.63203
Studies in stage 2 = 33.56%
Distribution of n(total)
- mean (range) = 29 (24 ... 86)
- percentiles
5% 50% 95%
24 24 48
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.