Nothing
#' The function to impute rounded continuous variables
#'
#' For example the income in surveys is often reported rounded by the respondents.
#' See Drechsler, Kiesl and Speidel (2015) for more details.
#' @param y_df A data.frame with the variable to impute.
#' @param X_imp A data.frame with the fixed effects variables explaining y_df.
#' @param PSI A data.frame with the variables explaining the latent rounding tendency G.
#' @param pvalue A numeric between 0 and 1 denoting the threshold of p-values a variable in the imputation
#' model should not exceed. If they do, they are excluded from the imputation model.
#' @param k An integer defining the allowed maximum of levels in a factor covariate.
#' @param rounding_degrees A numeric vector with the presumed rounding degrees for Y.
#' @references Joerg Drechsler, Hans Kiesl, Matthias Speidel (2015):
#' "MI Double Feature: Multiple Imputation to Address Nonresponse and Rounding Errors in Income Questions".
#' Austrian Journal of Statistics Vol. 44, No. 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v44i2.77
#' @return A n x 1 data.frame with the original and imputed values.
imp_roundedcont <- function(y_df,
X_imp,
PSI,
pvalue = 0.2,
k = Inf,
rounding_degrees = NULL){
# ----------------------------- preparing the Y data ------------------
y <- y_df[, 1]
if(is.factor(y)){
y <- as.interval(y)
}
#currently the method does not consider 0 (no rounding)
no_rounding_at_all <- y %% 1 != 0
y <- round(y)
n <- length(y)
# ----------------------------- preparing the X data ------------------
# remove excessive variables
X_imp <- cleanup(X_imp, k = k)
# standardize X
X <- stand(X_imp)
#If no default rounding_degrees were given, suggest_rounding_degrees suggets them
if(is.null(rounding_degrees)){
rounding_degrees <- suggest_rounding_degrees(y)
}
#... if they are still NULL, then c(1, 10, 100, 1000) is used as a default
if(is.null(rounding_degrees)){
rounding_degrees <- c(1, 10, 100, 1000)
}
#The imputation model of missing values is Y ~ X.
#In order to get a full model matrix, we need two things
#1. A place holder ph with a precice structure
#(meaning that ph is not of class interval. Nevertheless the elements in ph
#can be an aggregate of imprecise observations (e.g. the mean of lower and upper bound))
#2. The place holder ph must not contain any NAs, NaNs or Infs.
decomposed_y <- decompose_interval(interval = y)
#short check for consistency:
if(any(decomposed_y[, "lower_general"] > decomposed_y[, "upper_general"], na.rm = TRUE)){
stop("in your interval covariate, some values in the lower bound exceed the upper bound.")
}
# classify the data into the three types of observations:
# 1. precise data (like 3010 or 3017 - in interval notation "3010;3010", "3017;3017")
# 2. imprecise data (like "3000;3600")
# 3. missing data (NA - in interval notation "-Inf;Inf")
#get the indicator of the missing values
indicator_precise <- !is.na(decomposed_y[, "precise"])
indicator_imprecise <- !is.na(decomposed_y[, "lower_imprecise"])
indicator_missing <- is.infinite(decomposed_y[, "lower_general"]) &
is.infinite(decomposed_y[, "upper_general"])
#Preparation for standadizing all observations in y, based on the precise values of y
#y_precise <- decomposed_y[, "precise"]
mean_of_y_precise <- mean(decomposed_y[, "precise"], na.rm = TRUE)
sd_of_y_precise <- stats::sd(decomposed_y[, "precise"], na.rm = TRUE)
# Standardise all observations:
# We intentionally add + 1 because otherwise with the standardized x,
# the intercept in the regression y ~ x can be exactly 0.
y_stand <- (y - mean_of_y_precise)/sd_of_y_precise + 1
y_precise_template <- sample_imp(center_interval(y, inf2NA = TRUE))[, 1]
y_precise_template_stand <- (y_precise_template - mean_of_y_precise)/sd_of_y_precise + 1
# standardise the decomposed y
decomposed_y_stand <- (decomposed_y - mean_of_y_precise)/sd_of_y_precise + 1
low_sample <- decomposed_y_stand[, "lower_general"]
up_sample <- decomposed_y_stand[, "upper_general"]
y_precise_template <- msm::rtnorm(n = n, lower = low_sample,
upper = up_sample,
mean = y_precise_template_stand,
sd = 1)
ph <- y_precise_template
# prepare the estimation of Y ~ X
Y_X_0_all <- data.frame(target = ph, X)
xnames_1 <- colnames(X)
Y_X_formula <- paste("target~ 0 + ", paste(xnames_1, collapse = "+"), sep = "")
reg_Y_X_1_all <- stats::lm(stats::formula(Y_X_formula), data = Y_X_0_all)
X_model_matrix_1_all <- stats::model.matrix(reg_Y_X_1_all)
xnames_1 <- paste("X", 1:ncol(X_model_matrix_1_all), sep = "")
colnames(X_model_matrix_1_all) <- xnames_1
Y_X_0_all <- data.frame(target = ph)
Y_X_0_all[, xnames_1] <- X_model_matrix_1_all
#From this initial model matrix X_model_matrix_1_all
#now step by step irrelavant variables are removed.
# Principally those models are based on precise observations only.
# But in some data situation, there might be no presice observations, only intervals;
# then all precise and interval data has to be used.
# Precise data can be use directly, from imprecise data, a draw from within their bounds is used
if(sum(indicator_precise) < 30){
use_indicator <- indicator_precise | indicator_imprecise
}else{
use_indicator <- indicator_precise
}
X_model_matrix_1_sub <- X_model_matrix_1_all[use_indicator, , drop = FALSE]
# The first step of the reduction is to remove variables having a non-measurable effect
# (e.g. due to colinearity) on y.
# tmp_1 shall include the covariates (like X_model_matrix) and additionally the target variable
ph_sub <- ph[use_indicator]
X_Y_1_sub <- data.frame(target = ph_sub)
xnames_1 <- colnames(X_model_matrix_1_sub)
X_Y_1_sub[, xnames_1] <- X_model_matrix_1_sub
Y_X_formula <- paste("target~ 0 + ", paste(xnames_1, collapse = "+"), sep = "")
reg_Y_X_1_sub <- stats::lm(stats::formula(Y_X_formula) , data = X_Y_1_sub)
#remove unneeded variables
X_model_matrix_1_sub <- X_model_matrix_1_sub[, !is.na(stats::coefficients(reg_Y_X_1_sub)),
drop = FALSE]
# Remove insignificant variables from the imputation model
check <- TRUE
while(check){
X_Y_1_sub <- data.frame(target = ph_sub)
xnames_1 <- colnames(X_model_matrix_1_sub)
X_Y_1_sub[, xnames_1] <- X_model_matrix_1_sub
Y_X_formula <- paste("target~ 0 + ", paste(xnames_1, collapse = "+"), sep = "")
reg_Y_X_1_sub <- stats::lm(stats::formula(Y_X_formula), data = X_Y_1_sub)
pvalues <- summary(reg_Y_X_1_sub)$coefficients[, 4]
insignificant_variables <- which(pvalues > pvalue)
most_insignificant <- insignificant_variables[which.max(pvalues[insignificant_variables])]
if(length(most_insignificant) == 0){
check <- FALSE
}else{
#.. drop the insignificant variable from the model.matrix, but only if at least 1 variable remains
tmp_MM <- stats::model.matrix(reg_Y_X_1_sub)[, -most_insignificant, drop = FALSE]
if(ncol(tmp_MM) == 0){
check <- FALSE
}else{
X_model_matrix_1_sub <- tmp_MM
}
}
}
Y_X_2_all <- Y_X_0_all[, colnames(X_Y_1_sub), drop = FALSE]
betastart <- as.vector(reg_Y_X_1_sub$coef)
sigmastart <- stats::sigma(reg_Y_X_1_sub)
if(is.na(sigmastart)) sigmastart <- 1
##### Preparation of rounding degrees start model #######
half_interval_length <- rounding_degrees/2
# Determine the rounding degrees of the precise observations
rounding_categories_indicator <- array(0, dim = sum(indicator_precise))
for(i in 1:length(rounding_degrees)){
rounding_categories_indicator <- ifelse(decomposed_y[indicator_precise, "precise"] %% rounding_degrees[i] == 0,
i, rounding_categories_indicator)
}
g <- factor(rounding_categories_indicator, ordered = TRUE)
##### preparing the PSI data (the variables explaining the rounding tendency G) ####
#check if y is part of PSI
is_y_in_PSI <- colnames(y_df)[1] %in% colnames(PSI)
# reason: it is a special covariate in PSI.
# It has a separat coefficient and is the only variable allowed being an interval variable.
PSIvars_being_intervals <- apply(PSI, 2, is_interval)
PSI <- PSI[, !PSIvars_being_intervals, drop = FALSE]
# This dataset must not include any NA, except y can include missing values, as
# the rounding tendency is only calculated based on precise observations
PSIvars_having_NAs <- apply(PSI, 2, function(x) any(is.na(x)))
PSI <- PSI[, !PSIvars_having_NAs, drop = FALSE]
#if y was a part of PSI, its precise part is included
if(is_y_in_PSI){
PSI[, colnames(y_df)[1]] <- decomposed_y[, "precise", drop = FALSE]
}
#standardize PSI
PSI <- stand(PSI)
# Define a matrix for the model G ~ PSI
df_for_g_sub <- data.frame(target = g, PSI[indicator_precise, , drop = FALSE])
#note: even if Y is not part of PSI, the conditioning on precise y is needed:
#imprecise Y (like "2000;3000") don't have a rounding degree.
#####maximum likelihood estimation using starting values
####estimation of the parameters
# estimation of the starting values for eta and the thresholds on the x-axis:
# ordered probit maximum possible rounding on the rounded in income data
probitstart <- tryCatch(
{
#polr throws an warning, if no intercept is included in the model formula
#(See ?polr)
#so we add one in the formula and exclude the constant variable in the data.frame
#before hand.
constant_variables <- apply(df_for_g_sub, 2, function(x) length(unique(x)) == 1)
df_for_g_sub2 <- df_for_g_sub[, !constant_variables, drop = FALSE]
if(ncol(df_for_g_sub2) == 1){ # only target variable is left
probitstart <- ordinal::clm("target ~ 1", data = df_for_g_sub2)
}else{
probitstart <- ordinal::clm("target ~ 1 + .", data = df_for_g_sub2)
}
probitstart
},
error = function(cond) {
stop("We assume that perfect separation occured in your rounded continuous variable, because of too few observations.\n
Consider specifying the variable to be continuous via list_of_types (see ?hmi).\n")
cat("Here is the original error message:\n")
cat(as.character(cond))
return(NULL)
},
warning = function(cond) {
cat("We assume that perfect separation occured in your rounded continuous variable, because of too few observations.\n
Consider specifying the variable to be continuous via list_of_types (see ?hmi).\n")
cat("Here is the original warning message:\n")
cat(as.character(cond))
constant_variables <- apply(df_for_g_sub, 2, function(x) length(unique(x)) == 1)
df_for_g_sub2 <- df_for_g_sub[, !constant_variables, drop = FALSE]
if(ncol(df_for_g_sub2) == 1){
probitstart <- ordinal::clm("target ~ 0 + .", data = df_for_g_sub)
}else{
probitstart <- ordinal::clm("target ~ 1 + .", data = df_for_g_sub2)
}
return(probitstart)
},
finally = {
}
)
PSI_as_MM_sub <- stats::model.matrix(probitstart)[[1]]
#remove the intercept variables
PSI_as_MM_sub <- PSI_as_MM_sub[, -grep("(Intercept)", colnames(PSI_as_MM_sub)), drop = FALSE]
#starting values for the thresholds:
tmp <- stats::coef(probitstart)
kstart <- as.vector(tmp[grep("[|]", names(tmp))])
# the tresholds (in the summary labeled "Intercepts")
#explaining the tresholds for the example of rounding degrees 1, 10, 100 and 1000:
#0 (rounding degree 1), 0|1 (reounding degree 10), 1|2 (100), 2|3 (1000)
# other regression parameters in the rounding model
gammastart <- -tmp[-grep("[|]", names(tmp))] # note the minus since clm uses this parametrization
gamma1start <- NULL
gamma1name <- NULL
# If Y is part of PSI, its coefficient gamma1 has to be treated seperately
if(is_y_in_PSI){
gamma1start <- gammastart[names(gammastart) == colnames(y_df)[1]]
gamma1name <- "gamma1"
}
# (For example, gamma1 is part of the covariance matrix in equation 3 in Drechsler, Kiesl, Speidel, 2015)
gammastart_without_y <- gammastart[names(gammastart) != colnames(y_df)[1]]
gammastart_without_y_name <- paste("coef_g_on_psi", 1:length(gammastart_without_y), sep = "")
#If Y would be the only variable, set gamma_without_y_name NULL
if(length(gammastart_without_y) == 0){
gammastart_without_y <- NULL
gammastart_without_y_name <- NULL
}
#####maximum likelihood estimation using the starting values
#The intercept of the model for y has not be maximized as due to the standardizations
#of y and x, it's value is exactly 1. later it will be removed.
starting_values <- c(kstart, betastart, gamma1start, gammastart_without_y, sigmastart)
#tau is not included as it has to be fixed at 1 to make the ordered probit model identifiable
#c.f. p.62 in Drechsler, Kiesl, Speidel (2015)
names(starting_values)[1:length(kstart)] <- paste("threshold", 1:length(kstart), sep = "")
names(starting_values)[length(kstart) + 1:length(betastart)] <-
paste("coef_y_on_x", 1:length(betastart), sep = "")
if(length(c(gamma1name, gammastart_without_y_name)) > 0){
names(starting_values)[length(kstart) + length(betastart) +
1:length(gammastart)] <- c(gamma1name, gammastart_without_y_name)
}
names(starting_values)[length(starting_values)] <- "sigma"
###exclude obs below (above) the 0.5% (99.5%) income quantile before maximizing
###the likelihood. Reason: Some extrem outliers probably cause problems during the
###maximization
quants <- stats::quantile(decomposed_y_stand[indicator_precise, "precise"],
c(0.005, 0.995), na.rm = TRUE)
indicator_outliers <- (decomposed_y_stand[indicator_precise, "precise"] < quants[1] |
decomposed_y_stand[indicator_precise, "precise"] > quants[2])
PSI_in_negloglik <- PSI_as_MM_sub[, colnames(PSI_as_MM_sub) != colnames(y_df)[1], drop = FALSE]
oldw <- getOption("warn")
options(warn = -1)
on.exit(options(warn = oldw))
m2 <- stats::nlm(f = negloglik, p = starting_values,
parnames = names(starting_values),
X_in_negloglik = Y_X_2_all[ , xnames_1, drop = FALSE],
PSI_in_negloglik = PSI_in_negloglik,
y_precise_stand = decomposed_y_stand[indicator_precise, "precise"],
lower_bounds = decomposed_y_stand[indicator_imprecise, 2],
upper_bounds = decomposed_y_stand[indicator_imprecise, 3],
my_g = as.numeric(as.character(g)),
sd_of_y_precise = sd_of_y_precise,
rounding_degrees = rounding_degrees,
indicator_precise = indicator_precise,
indicator_imprecise = indicator_imprecise,
indicator_outliers = indicator_outliers,
hessian = TRUE, gradtol = 1e-4, steptol = 1e-4)
par_ml2 <- m2$estimate
names(par_ml2) <- names(starting_values)
hess <- m2$hessian
if(m2$code > 2){
warning(paste("Likelihood-optimization for rounded continuous variable", colnames(y_df), "failed."))
}
# link about nearest covariance matrix:
# http://quant.stackexchange.com/questions/2074/what-is-the-best-way-to-fix-a-covariance-matrix-that-is-not-positive-semi-defi
# nearPD(hess)$mat
# isSymmetric(Sigma_ml2)
Sigma_ml2 <- tryCatch(
{
solve(hess)
},
error = function(cond) {
cat("Hessian matrix couldn't be inverted (in the imputation function of the rounded continuous variable).
Still, you should get a result, but which needs special attention.\n")
tmp <- diag(ncol(hess))
diag(tmp) <- abs(par_ml2)/100
return(tmp)
},
warning = function(cond) {
cat("There seems to be a problem with the Hessian matrix in the imputation of the rounded continuous variable\n")
cat("Here is the original warning message:\n")
cat(as.character(cond))
return(solve(hess))
},
finally = {
}
)
####draw new parameters (because it is a Bayesian imputation)
# Boolean value indicating whether the parameters are valid or not
invalid <- TRUE
#numerical problems can result in a not positive definite Matrix.
Sigma_ml3 <- as.matrix(Matrix::nearPD(Sigma_ml2)$mat)
counter <- 0
while(invalid & counter < 1000){
counter <- counter + 1
pars <- mvtnorm::rmvnorm(1, mean = par_ml2, sigma = Sigma_ml3)
#first eq on page 63 in Drechsler, Kiesl, Speidel (2015)
####test if drawn parameters for the thresholds are in increasing order
####and if the standard deviation of the residuals is <= 0
####if yes, draw again
# pars takes the starting values c(kstart, betastart2, gamma1start, sigmastart2)
invalid <- is.unsorted(pars[1:(length(rounding_degrees) - 1)]) | pars[length(pars)] <= 0
}
# derive imputation model parameters from previously drawn parameters
if(ncol(X_model_matrix_1_sub) == 1){
beta_hat <- matrix(1, ncol = 1)
}else{
beta_hat <- matrix(pars[grep("^coef_y_on_x", colnames(pars))], ncol = 1)
}
gamma1_hat <- pars[grep("^gamma1", colnames(pars))]
if(length(gamma1_hat) == 0){
gamma1_hat <- 0
}
gamma_hat <- matrix(pars[grep("^coef_g_on_psi", colnames(pars))], ncol = 1)
sigma_hat <- pars[grep("^sigma", colnames(pars))]
#For the potentially ROUNDED observations, the potential rounding tendency has to be modeled
mu_g <- gamma1_hat * (as.matrix(Y_X_2_all[indicator_precise, xnames_1, drop = FALSE]) %*% beta_hat) +
PSI_in_negloglik %*% gamma_hat
#For the ROUNDED, MISSING and INTERVAL observations, y has to be modeled.
mu_y <- as.matrix(Y_X_2_all[, xnames_1, drop = FALSE]) %*% beta_hat
#so mu_g and mu_y generally differ in length!
#The covariance matrix from equation (3)
Sigma <- matrix(c(1 + gamma1_hat^2 * sigma_hat^2,
gamma1_hat * sigma_hat^2, gamma1_hat * sigma_hat^2,
sigma_hat^2), nrow = 2)
###########################################################
#BEGIN IMPUTING INTERVAL-DATA AND COMPLETELY MISSING DATA#
# The imputation for precise but rounded data follows in the next section.
lower_general_stand <- decomposed_y_stand[, "lower_general"][indicator_imprecise | indicator_missing]
upper_general_stand <- decomposed_y_stand[, "upper_general"][indicator_imprecise | indicator_missing]
#draw values from the truncated normal distributions
# the bounds are straight forward for the interval data.
# for the missing data, the bounds are -Inf and +Inf,
# which is equivalent to draw from a unbounded normal distribution
mytry_interval <- msm::rtnorm(n = sum(indicator_imprecise | indicator_missing),
lower = lower_general_stand,
upper = upper_general_stand,
mean = mu_y[indicator_imprecise | indicator_missing],
sd = sigma_hat)
# proposed values for imputation
#do the backtransformation from
#standardised to unstandardised
imp_tmp <- decomposed_y[, "precise"]
imp_tmp[indicator_imprecise | indicator_missing] <-
(mytry_interval - 1) * sd_of_y_precise + mean_of_y_precise
###############################################################################
########################### BEGIN UNROUNDING-IMPUTATION########################
###define bounds for the rounding basis
bounds_for_g_hat <- c(-Inf, pars[1:(length(rounding_degrees) - 1)], Inf)
###define interval bounds for maximum possible rounding intervals
#Principally this could be done without standardization, but it makes the following functions
#work more reliably.
#If standardization happens, it is important to adjust the parameters accordingly.
actually_rounded <- g != 0
y_lower <- (decomposed_y[indicator_precise, "precise"][actually_rounded] -
half_interval_length[as.numeric(as.character(g))[actually_rounded]] - mean_of_y_precise)/sd_of_y_precise + 1
y_upper <- (decomposed_y[indicator_precise, "precise"][actually_rounded] +
half_interval_length[as.numeric(as.character(g))[actually_rounded]] - mean_of_y_precise)/sd_of_y_precise + 1
g_upper <- bounds_for_g_hat[as.numeric(as.character(g))[actually_rounded] + 1]
elements <- cbind(-Inf, mu_g[actually_rounded], g_upper,
y_lower, mu_y[indicator_precise, 1][actually_rounded], y_upper)
# Note: we set g_lower to -Inf because we state that a value of 1500 is not necessarily
# a multiple of 500; it could also be rounded to the next multiple of 10 or even 1.
colnames(elements) <- c("g_lower", "mean_g","g_upper", "y_lower","mean_y", "y_upper")
###indicator which of the precise observations need to be imputed due to rounding
#(incl. rounding to the nearest number, i.e. rounding to degree 1)
#(and not because they are missing)
rounded <- rep(TRUE, sum(actually_rounded))
counter <- 0
while(any(rounded) & counter <= 1000){
counter <- counter + 1
if(counter == 1000){
print(paste("Imputation of rounded continuous variable", colnames(y_df)[1], "failed."))
}
###draw values for g and y from a truncated multivariate normal
###drawn y must be between y_lower and y_upper
###drawn g must be between g_lower and g_upper
#If the model has some problems finding a suitable rounding degree,
#the expected mean of g is increased to the threshold seperating the highest and second highest
# category
if(counter >= 100){
elements[, 2] <- bounds_for_g_hat[length(bounds_for_g_hat)-1]
}
mytry <- t(apply(elements[rounded, , drop = FALSE],
1, sampler, Sigma))
#It can happen, that rtmvnorm can't sample values from a truncated normal distribution
#properly. See the following example returning two NaNs
#instead a values from [0;1]:
#tmvtnorm::rtmvnorm(1, mean = c(40, 0.5),
# sigma = diag(2),
# lower = c(0, 0),
# upper = c(1, 1),
# algorithm = "gibbs", burn.in.samples = 1000)
#So, if for individual i no valid value for g or y could be sampled,
# it could either be because mu_g[i] lies outisde of the interval
#[g_lower[i];g_upper[i]] or because mu_y[i] outside of y_lower[i];y_upper[i]].
# We then check whether it is mu_g or mu_y, that lies outside its interval
#and then replace the corresponding mean
#by a uniform sample between the lower and the upper bound.
#replace the invalid draws with valid ones.
# For the latent rounding tendency, we use the highest possible rounding tendency
# For y, we use a uniform sample between the highest and lowest possible
#bounds of y.
problematic_draws <- is.na(mytry[, 1])
problematic_elements <- elements[problematic_draws, , drop = FALSE]
#If the model has even further deficiancies, all remaining elements are considered problematic
if(counter >= 200){
toosmall_ys <- elements[, 5] < elements[, 4]
toolarge_ys <- elements[, 5] > elements[, 6]
elements[toosmall_ys, 5] <- elements[toosmall_ys, 4]
elements[toolarge_ys, 5] <- elements[toolarge_ys, 6]
}
# check if there are problematic means of g. This is the case if the mean is outside
# the interval for a possible g.
toosmall_gs <- problematic_elements[, 2] < problematic_elements[, 1]
toolarge_gs <- problematic_elements[, 2] > problematic_elements[, 3]
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toosmall_gs], 2] <-
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toosmall_gs], 1]
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toolarge_gs], 2] <-
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toolarge_gs], 3]
toosmall_ys <- problematic_elements[, 5] < problematic_elements[, 4]
toolarge_ys <- problematic_elements[, 5] > problematic_elements[, 6]
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toosmall_ys], 5] <-
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toosmall_ys], 4]
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toolarge_ys], 5] <-
elements[which(problematic_draws)[toolarge_ys], 6]
####get imputed rounding indicator
round_int <- apply(mytry[, 1, drop = FALSE], 1,
function(x) sum(x > bounds_for_g_hat))
###get imputed income on original scale
imp_precise_temp <- (mytry[, 2, drop = FALSE] - 1) * sd_of_y_precise + mean_of_y_precise
#Store these results as imputation values...
imp_tmp[indicator_precise][actually_rounded][rounded] <- imp_precise_temp
#... but test if estimated rounding degree and proposed y can explain the observed y.
# E.g. the estimated rounding degree 10 and the proposed y 2063 doesn't match
#to an observed value 2100. A degree of 100 would match in this case.
#If degree and y do match set the value for rounded to FALSE.
# The remaining (non-matching) observations get a new proposal y and rounding degree.
domatch <- floor(imp_precise_temp[, 1]/rounding_degrees[round_int] + 0.5) * rounding_degrees[round_int] ==
decomposed_y[indicator_precise, "precise"][actually_rounded][rounded]
rounded[rounded][domatch] <- FALSE
}
#restore the original values for those observations with no rounding at all (rounding degree 0).
no_rounding_at_all_clean <- no_rounding_at_all
no_rounding_at_all_clean[is.na(no_rounding_at_all)] <- FALSE
imp_tmp[no_rounding_at_all_clean] <- decomposed_y[no_rounding_at_all_clean, "precise"]
y_ret <- data.frame(y_ret = imp_tmp)
return(y_ret)
}
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.