mashr with common baseline at mean

knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE,comment = "#",fig.width = 5,
                      fig.height = 4,fig.align = "center",
                      eval = TRUE)


In the previous vignette mash common baseline, we estimate the change in some quantity computed in multiple conditions over a common control condition. However, there might be no common control condition in a study. In this case, we define the reference condition as the mean over different conditions. Deviation in any condition is defined as a difference in the quantity over the mean. We want to estimate the change in some quantity computed in multiple conditions over their mean.

For example, we measure the gene expression under multiple conditions. We want to estimate the change in expression in multiple conditions over their mean.

As in the mash common baseline vignette, we include the additional burden of comparing all conditions to the same reference condition. To deal with these additional correlations, mashr allows the user to specify the reference condition using mash_update_data with ref = 'mean', after setting up the data in mash_set_data.


generate_data = function(n, p, V, Utrue, err_sd=0.01, pi=NULL){
  if (is.null(pi)) {
    pi = rep(1, length(Utrue)) # default to uniform distribution
  assertthat::are_equal(length(pi), length(Utrue))

  for (j in 1:length(Utrue)) {
    assertthat::are_equal(dim(Utrue[j]), c(p, p))

  pi <- pi / sum(pi) # normalize pi to sum to one
  which_U <- sample(1:length(pi), n, replace=TRUE, prob=pi)

  Beta = matrix(0, nrow=n, ncol=p)
  for(i in 1:n){
    Beta[i,] = mvrnorm(1, rep(0, p), Utrue[[which_U[i]]])
  Shat = matrix(err_sd, nrow=n, ncol=p, byrow = TRUE)
  E = mvrnorm(n, rep(0, p), Shat[1,]^2 * V)
  Bhat = Beta + E
  return(list(B = Beta, Bhat=Bhat, Shat = Shat, whichU = which_U))

Here we simulate data for illustration. This simulation routine creates a dataset with 5 conditions and 2000 samples. Half of the samples have equal expression among conditions. In the rest samples, half have higher and equal expression in the first 2 conditions, half have higher expression in the last condition.

n = 2000
R = 5
V = diag(R)
U0 = matrix(0, R, R)
U1 = matrix(1, R, R)
U2 = U0; U2[1:2,1:2] = 4
U3 = U0; U3[5,5] = 4
simdata = generate_data(n, R, V, list(U0=U0, U1=U1, U2=U2, U3 = U3), err_sd = 1)
  1. Read in the data, and set the reference condition as mean
data = mash_set_data(simdata$Bhat, simdata$Shat)

data.L = mash_update_data(data, ref = 'mean')

The updated mash data object (data.L) includes the induced correlation internally.

  1. We proceed the analysis using the simple canonical covariances as in the initial introductory vignette, and the data driven covariances as in the Introduction to mash: data-driven covariances.

  2. Canonical covariances

U.c = cov_canonical(data.L)
m.1by1 = mash_1by1(data.L)
strong = get_significant_results(m.1by1)
U.pca = cov_pca(data.L,2,subset=strong)
U.ed = cov_ed(data.L, U.pca, subset=strong)
  1. Fit mash model
m = mash(data.L, c(U.c,U.ed), algorithm.version = 'R')

The log likelihood is


Use get_significant_results to find the indices of effects that are 'significant':

null.ind = which(simdata$whichU %in% c(1,2))

The number of false positive is r sum(get_significant_results(m) %in% null.ind).

Try the mashr package in your browser

Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.

mashr documentation built on Oct. 18, 2023, 5:08 p.m.