data-raw/SignatureAnalyzer.052418/SignatureAnalyzer.PCAWG.COMPOSITE-steve-questions.R
In WuyangFF95/SynSigRun: Run Mutational Signature Analysis Software Packages Using Mutational Spectra generated by SynSigGen
############################################################################################
############################################################################################
#### Copyright (c) 2017, Broad Institute
#### Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
#### modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
#### met:
#### Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
#### notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
#### Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
#### notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
#### the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
#### distribution.
#### Neither the name of the Broad Institute nor the names of its
#### contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
#### from this software without specific prior written permission.
#### THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
#### "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
#### LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
#### A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
#### HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
#### SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
#### LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
#### DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
#### THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
#### (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
#### OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
##############################################################################
###### COMPOSITE SIGNATURE EXTRACTIO AND ATTRIBUTION
##############################################################################
##############################################################################
###### SIGNATURE EXTRACTION
##############################################################################
######SignatureAnalyzer applied two-step signature extraction strategy in 2,780
######PCAWG samples. First, the global signature extraction was performed for
######the low mutation burden samples (n=2624) without putative POLE and MSI
######samples, skin tumours, and one TMZ sample. Second, additional signatures
######unique to hyper-mutated samples were extracted with maintaining all
######signatures discovered in the low mutation burden-samples This approach is
######expected to minimize a "signature bleeding" or biase of hyper- or
######ultra-mutated samples on the signature extraction process and also enalbes
######key information on the signature availability i.e., the signatures found
######only in hyper-mutated samples are not allowed in low mutation
######burden-samples, while all signatures are available in hyper-mutated
######samples with no constraints.
################################################################################
################################################################################
CURRENT <- paste(getwd(),"/",sep="")
INPUT <- paste(CURRENT,"INPUT_SignatureAnalyzer/",sep="") ### Directory for INPUT data
OUTPUT <- paste(CURRENT,"OUTPUT_SignatureAnalyzer/",sep="") #### Directory for OUTPUT data
TEMPORARY <- paste(CURRENT,"TEMPORARY_SignatureAnalyzer/",sep="")
system(paste("mkdir",OUTPUT,sep=" "))
system(paste("mkdir",TEMPORARY,sep=" "))
source("SignatureAnalyzer.PCAWG.function.R")
###### loading input mutation counts matrix along 1536 SNV + 78 DNP + 83 INDEL
###### features across 2780 PCAWG samples SNV features in 1536 contexts were
###### defined as six-letters such as "CTAATT", in which first two letters
###### refers to the reference and altered bases, and next four letters
###### represent a base at -2, -1, +1, and +2 position at mutated pyrimidines (C
###### or T), e.g, C>T at AACTT penta-nucleotide sequence motif. SNV features in
###### 96 contexts were defined as four-letters such as "CTAT", in which first
###### two letters refers to the reference and altered bases, and next two
###### letters represent a base at -1 and +1 position at mutated pyrimidines (C
###### or T), e.g, C>T at ACT tri-nucleotide sequence motif.
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego1536.PAN.SNV.091217.RData",sep="")) ### SNV lego-matrix in 1536 contexts
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego96.PAN.SNV.091217.RData",sep="")) ### SNV lego-matrix in 96 contexts
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego1536.DNP.091217.RData",sep="")) ### DNP lego-matrix
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego1536.INDEL.091217.RData",sep="")) ### INDEL lego-matrix
lego1536.PAN <- rbind(lego1536.SNV,lego1536.DNP,lego1536.INDEL)
### COMPOSITE lego-matrix in 1697 features (1536 SNV + 78 DNP + 83 INDEL)
###### loading information on hyper- or ultra-mutated samples; POLE (n=9), MSI
###### (n=39), all SKIN (n=107), and single TMZ (CNS_GBM__SP25494)
load(file=paste(INPUT,"sample.POLE.RData",sep=""))
load(file=paste(INPUT,"sample.MSI1.RData",sep=""))
load(file=paste(INPUT,"sample.remove.RData",sep=""))
sample.TMZ <- c("CNS_GBM__SP25494")
###### COMPOSITE lego matrix for PRIMARY and SECONDARY datasets
lego.PRIMARY <- lego1536.PAN[,!colnames(lego1536.PAN)%in%sample.remove]
lego.SECONDARY <- lego1536.PAN[,colnames(lego1536.PAN)%in%sample.remove]
####### First step: Signature Extraction for the PRIMARY 2624 sample set Execute
####### several Bayesian NMF runs and select the solution with the lowest value
####### of res[[4]] (-log(posterior)) at the lowest number of signatures.
####### Bayesian NMF begins with the maximum number of signatures (Kcol) and
####### irrelevant columns and rows in both W and H, respectively, are
####### iteratively removed through the automatic relevance determination
####### techinique and the final number of signatures is determined by counting
####### non-zero columns in W (res[[1]]).
if (FALSE) {
Kcol <- 50
method <- "L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_FIRST"
for (i in 1:10) {
res <- BayesNMF.L1W.L2H(as.matrix(lego.PRIMARY),200000,10,5,1.e-05,Kcol,Kcol,1)
save(res,file=paste(OUTPUT,paste(method,i,"RData",sep="."),sep=""))
}
}
####### Second step: Signature Extraction for the SECONDARY 156
####### sample set Execute several Bayesian NMF runs and select the solution with
####### the lowest value of res[[4]] (-log(posterior)) at the lowest number of
####### signatures
load(file=paste(OUTPUT,"L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_FIRST.RData",sep=""))
### loading BayesNMF solution for the primary data set (example RData file).
# Steve: W contains the signtures extracted from the "primary" data set.
W <- res[[1]]
H <- res[[2]]
index <- colSums(W) > 1 ### sum(index) is the number of signatures in the primary data set
###### All mutation burdens of the primary dataset are now included in the W
###### matrix (signature-loading) and the H matrix (activity-loading).
W <- W[,index]
H <- H[index,]
W1536.PRIMARY <- W
H1536.PRIMARY <- H
for (i in 1:ncol(W)) {
H1536.PRIMARY[i,] <- H1536.PRIMARY[i,]*colSums(W)[i]
W1536.PRIMARY[,i] <- W1536.PRIMARY[,i]*rowSums(H)[i]
# Jaegil, it looks likes this puts the sum of the mutation
# counts for signature i in the corresponding column of
# W1536.PRIMARY, correct?
}
colnames(W1536.PRIMARY) <- paste("Primary.W",seq(1:ncol(W1536.PRIMARY)),sep="")
rownames(H1536.PRIMARY) <- colnames(W1536.PRIMARY)
W1536.PRIMARY.norm <- apply(W1536.PRIMARY,2,function(x) x/sum(x)) ## Normalized primary signatures
###### PRIMARY signatures (W1536.PRIMARY) with all mutation burdens were added
###### to the muation count matrix of the secondary data set. Thus all PRIMARY
###### signatures are now treated as extra fake samples with keeping mutation
###### burdens in the PRIMARY 2624 samples. This process enforces the primary
###### signatures to be reatined in the secondary signature extraction, while
###### enablling a discovery of novel signatures unique to the second primary
###### data set.
lego.PRIMARY.SECONDARY <- cbind(W1536.PRIMARY,lego.SECONDARY)
# Jaegil, it looks like the result of the cbind will
# serve as the V matrix for the secondary extraction, correct?
method <- "L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_SECOND"
if (FALSE) {
Kcol <- 96
for (i in 1:10) {
res <- BayesNMF.L1W.L2H(as.matrix(lego.PRIMARY.SECONDARY),200000,10,5,5.e-06,Kcol,Kcol,1)
save(res,file=paste(OUTPUT,paste(method,i,"RData",sep="."),sep=""))
}
}
load(file=paste(OUTPUT,"L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_SECOND.RData",sep=""))
### loading BayesNMF solution for the primary data set (example RData file)
W <- res[[1]]
H <- res[[2]]
index <- colSums(W) > 1
### sum(index) is the number of extracted signatures in the primary data set
W <- W[,index]
H <- H[index,]
W1536.SECONDARY <- W
H1536.SECONDARY <- H
for (i in 1:ncol(W)) {
H1536.SECONDARY[i,] <- H1536.SECONDARY[i,]*colSums(W)[i]
W1536.SECONDARY[,i] <- W1536.SECONDARY[,i]*rowSums(H)[i]
}
colnames(W1536.SECONDARY) <- paste("Secondary.W",seq(1:ncol(W1536.SECONDARY)),sep="")
rownames(H1536.SECONDARY) <- colnames(W1536.SECONDARY)
W1536.SECONDARY.norm <- apply(W1536.SECONDARY,2,function(x) x/sum(x))
###### cosine similairy between W1536.SECONDARY (signatures in the second step)
###### and W1536.PRIMARY (signatures in the first step)
corr <- plot.W.correlation(W1536.SECONDARY.norm[1:1536,],W1536.PRIMARY.norm[1:1536,])
corr.max <- apply(corr,1,function(x) max(x)) ### maximum cosine similarity of secondary signatures to primary signatures
corr.id <- apply(corr,1,function(x) which.max(x)) ### primary signature ID with corr.max
###### summary data-frame mapping the signatures in the second extration step
###### to the signatures in the frist step
df.summary <- data.frame(colnames(W1536.SECONDARY),colnames(W1536.PRIMARY)[corr.id],corr.id,corr.max) ### summary for the comparison of secondary signatures to primary ones
colnames(df.summary) <- c("secondary","primary","primary.id","CS.max")
df.summary[,"CS_0.99"] <- df.summary$CS.max > 0.99
###### identify primary signatures retained in the secondary signature
###### extraction (W1536.1) and those attributions in 2624 samples (H1536.1)
W1536.1 <- W1536.PRIMARY[,match(df.summary$primary[df.summary$CS_0.99],colnames(W1536.PRIMARY),nomatch=0)]
H1536.1 <- H1536.PRIMARY[match(df.summary$primary[df.summary$CS_0.99],rownames(H1536.PRIMARY),nomatch=0),]
colnames(W1536.1) <- df.summary$secondary[df.summary$CS_0.99]
rownames(H1536.1) <- colnames(W1536.1)
###### identify signatures unique to the hyper-mutated samples (W1536.2) in the
###### secondary signature extraction and those attributions in 156 samples
###### (H1536.2.2) H1536.2.1 is a signature attribution of the primary
###### signatures in hyper-mutated samples.
W1536.2 <- W1536.SECONDARY[,!df.summary$CS_0.99]
H1536.2.1 <- H1536.SECONDARY[df.summary$CS_0.99,(ncol(W1536.PRIMARY)+1):ncol(H1536.SECONDARY)]
H1536.2.2 <- H1536.SECONDARY[!df.summary$CS_0.99,(ncol(W1536.PRIMARY)+1):ncol(H1536.SECONDARY)]
n.hyper <- ncol(W1536.2) ### # of signatures unique to hyper-mutated samples
W.tmp1 <- W1536.1
lego.tmp1 <- get.lego96.from.lego1536(W.tmp1[1:1536,]) ### get lego in 96 contexts from 1536 contexts
colnames(lego.tmp1) <- gsub("Secondary.","",colnames(lego.tmp1))
p1 <- plot.signature.SNV(lego.tmp1,"validation")
pdf(file=paste(OUTPUT,paste("signature.SNV.primary.re_ordered.pdf",sep="."),sep=""),
width=(12),height=0.75*ncol(lego.tmp1))
plot(p1) ### plotting primary signatures
dev.off()
W.tmp2 <- cbind(W1536.1,W1536.2)
lego.tmp2 <- get.lego96.from.lego1536(W.tmp2[1:1536,])
colnames(lego.tmp2) <- gsub("Secondary.","",colnames(lego.tmp2))
p2 <- plot.signature.SNV(lego.tmp2,"validation")
pdf(file=paste(OUTPUT,paste("signature.SNV.secondary.re_ordered.pdf",sep="."),sep=""),width=(12),height=0.75*ncol(lego.tmp2))
plot(p2) ### plotting all signatures (primary + secondary)
dev.off()
#################################################################################################
###### SIGNATURE ATTRIBUTION
#################################################################################################
###### SignatureAnalyzer applied a separate process for low-mutation burden and hyper-mutated samples in all COMPOSITE, SBS, DBS, and ID signature attributions.
###### The signature attribution in low-mutation burden samples was performed in each tumour type,
###### while the attribution was separately performed in MSI (n=39), POLE (n=9), skin-melanoma cohort (n=107), and a single TMZ sample.
###### In each cohort, the signature availability (e.g., which signatures are active or not in each cohort) was automatically inferred
###### through the automatic relevance determination process applied to the activity matrix H only, while fixing the signature W.
###### To prevent signatures found in hyper-mutated samples in low-mutation burden samples
###### the H matrix was element-wise-multiplied by a binary, signature indicator matrix Z (signature by samples) in every multiplication update of H.
###### Every elements of Z corresponding to the hyper-mutated signatures and low-mutation burden samples set to zero.
###### Three additional rules were applied in the SBS signature attribution to enforce biological plausibility and minimize a signature bleeding
###### (i) allow signature SBS4 (smoking signature) only in lung and head and neck cases;
###### (ii) allow signature SBS11 (TMZ signature) in a single GBM sample;
###### (iii) allow the 25 signatures found in hyper-mutated samples to be used only in hyper-mutated samples.
###### On the other hand, no other rules except that signatures found in hyper-mutated samples were not allowed in low-mutation burden-samples
###### were applied in both ID and DBS signature attributions
#################################################################################################
######################
####### Assigning attributions in the PRIMARY 2624 sample set
######################
W1536.1.norm <- apply(W1536.1,2,function(x) x/sum(x))
W1536.2.norm <- apply(W1536.2,2,function(x) x/sum(x))
W0 <- W1536.1.norm #### fixed PRIMARY W
H0 <- H1536.1 #### initialization for PRIMARY H
V0 <- lego1536.PAN[,match(colnames(H0),colnames(lego1536.PAN),nomatch=0)] #### COMPOSITE lego matrix for 2624 samples
K0 <- ncol(W0) #### # of signatures
x1 <- sapply(colnames(V0),function(x) strsplit(x,"__")[[1]][1])
x2 <- sapply(colnames(V0),function(x) strsplit(x,"__")[[1]][2])
ttype <- x1
ttype[ttype%in%c("Breast_AdenoCA","Breast_DCIS","Breast_LobularCA")] <- "Breast"
ttype[ttype%in%c("Cervix_AdenoCA","Cervix_SCC")] <- "Cervix"
ttype[ttype%in%c("Myeloid_MDS","Myeloid_MPN")] <- "Myeloid_MDS/MPN"
ttype[ttype%in%c("Bone_Benign","Bone_Epith")] <- "Bone-Other"
ttype.unique <- unique(ttype)
n.ttype.unique <- length(ttype.unique)
Z0 <- array(1,dim=c(K0,ncol(V0))) ### signature indicator matrix Z (0 = not allowed, 1 = allowed); all elements initialized by one.
colnames(Z0) <- colnames(H0)
rownames(Z0) <- rownames(H0)
Z0[11,!ttype%in%c("Head_SCC","Lung_AdenoCA","Lung_SCC")] <- 0 ### Smoking signature is only allowed in Lung and Head-neck
a0 <- 10 ### default parameter
phi <- 1.5 ### default parameter
for (i in 1:n.ttype.unique) {
#### First step: determine a set of optimal signatures best explaining the observed mutations in each cohort.
#### The automatic relevance determination technique was applied to the H matrix only, while keeping signatures (W0) frozen.
cohort <- ttype.unique[i]
W1 <- W0
V1 <- as.matrix(V0[,ttype==cohort])
Z1 <- Z0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)]
H1 <- Z1*H0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)]
lambda <- rep(1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2,K0)
res0 <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z(as.matrix(V1),as.matrix(W1),as.matrix(H1),as.matrix(Z1),lambda,2000000,a0,1.e-07,1/phi)
H2 <- res0[[2]]
colnames(H2) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H2) <- colnames(W0)
#### Second step: determine a sample-level signature attribution using selected sigantures in the first step.
index.H2 <- rowSums(H2)>1 ### identify only active signatures in the cohort
Z2 <- Z1
Z2[!index.H2,] <- 0 ### only selected signatures in the first step are allowed + the original contraints on the signature availability from Z1.
for (j in 1:ncol(H2)) {
tmpH <- rep(0,ncol(W0))
if (sum(V1[,j])>=5) {
lambda <- 1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2
res <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z.sample(as.matrix(V1[,j]),W0,as.matrix(H2[,j]),as.matrix(Z2[,j]),lambda,1000000,a0,1.e-07,1)
tmpH <- res[[2]]
}
if (j==1) {
H3 <- tmpH
} else {
H3 <- cbind(H3,tmpH)
cat(j,'\n')
}
}
colnames(H3) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H3) <- colnames(W0)
if (i==1) {
H2.all <- H2
H3.all <- H3
} else {
H2.all <- cbind(H2.all,H2)
H3.all <- cbind(H3.all,H3)
}
}
H.COMPOSITE.nohyper <- H3.all ### attributions of COMPOSITE signatures in the PRIMARY sample set
######################
####### Assigning attributions in the SECONDARY 156 sample set
######################
W0 <- cbind(W1536.1.norm,W1536.2.norm) ### fixed (PRIMARY + SECONDARY) W
H0 <- rbind(H1536.2.1,H1536.2.2) ### initialization for (PRIMARY + SECONDARY) H for 156 samples
V0 <- lego1536.PAN[,match(colnames(H0),colnames(lego1536.PAN),nomatch=0)] #### COMPOSITE lego matrix for 156 samples
K0 <- ncol(W0)
x0 <- colnames(H0)
ttype <- rep("Skin_Melanoma",length(x0))
ttype[x0%in%sample.MSI1] <- "MSI"
ttype[x0%in%sample.POLE] <- "POLE"
ttype[x0=="CNS_GBM__SP25494"] <- "TMZ"
ttype.unique <- unique(ttype)
n.ttype.unique <- length(ttype.unique)
Z0 <- array(1,dim=c(K0,ncol(V0))) ### signature indicator matrix Z (0 = not allowed, 1 = allowed); all elements initialized by one.
colnames(Z0) <- colnames(H0)
rownames(Z0) <- rownames(H0)
Z0[11,!ttype%in%c("Head_SCC","Lung_AdenoCA","Lung_SCC")] <- 0 ### Smoking signature is only allowed in Lung and Head-neck
Z0[59,!ttype=="TMZ"] <- 0 ### TMZ signature is only allowed in a single TMZ sample.
for (i in 1:n.ttype.unique) {
#### First step: determine a set of optimal signatures best explaining the observed mutations in each cohort.
#### The automatic relevance determination technique was applied to the H matrix only, while keeping signatures (W0) frozen.
cohort <- ttype.unique[i]
W1 <- W0
V1 <- as.matrix(V0[,which(ttype==cohort)])
if (cohort=="TMZ") {
colnames(V1) <- sample.TMZ
Z1 <- as.matrix(Z0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
H1 <- Z1*as.matrix(H0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
colnames(Z1) <- sample.TMZ
colnames(H1) <- sample.TMZ
}
Z1 <- as.matrix(Z0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
H1 <- Z1*as.matrix(H0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
lambda <- rep(1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2,K0)
res0 <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z(as.matrix(V1),as.matrix(W1),as.matrix(H1),as.matrix(Z1),lambda,2000000,a0,1.e-07,1/phi)
H2 <- res0[[2]]
colnames(H2) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H2) <- colnames(W0)
#### Second step: determine a sample-level signature attribution using selected sigantures in the first step.
index.H2 <- rowSums(H2)>1 ### identify only active signatures in the cohort
Z2 <- Z1
Z2[!index.H2,] <- 0 ### only selected signatures in the first step are allowed + the original contraints on the signature availability from Z1.
for (j in 1:ncol(H2)) {
tmpH <- rep(0,ncol(W0))
if (sum(V1[,j])>=5) {
lambda <- 1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2
res <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z.sample(as.matrix(V1[,j]),W0,as.matrix(H2[,j]),as.matrix(Z2[,j]),lambda,1000000,a0,1.e-07,1)
tmpH <- res[[2]]
}
if (j==1) {
H3 <- tmpH
} else {
H3 <- cbind(H3,tmpH)
cat(j,'\n')
}
}
colnames(H3) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H3) <- colnames(W0)
if (i==1) {
H2.all <- H2
H3.all <- H3
} else {
H2.all <- cbind(H2.all,H2)
H3.all <- cbind(H3.all,H3)
}
}
H.COMPOSITE.hyper <- H3.all ### attributions of COMPOSITE signatures in the SECONDARY sample set
######################
####### Combining attributions of PIRMARY and SECONARY datasets
######################
tmp1 <- array(0,dim=c(n.hyper,ncol(H.COMPOSITE.nohyper)))
rownames(tmp1) <- colnames(W1536.2)
colnames(tmp1) <- colnames(H.COMPOSITE.nohyper)
H.COMPOSITE <- cbind(rbind(H.COMPOSITE.nohyper,tmp1),H.COMPOSITE.hyper) ### attributions of COMPOSITE signatures across 2780 samples
###### save all results: lego.COMPOSITE - original lego-matrix, W.COMPOSITE - signatures, H.COMPOSITE - attributions
W.COMPOSITE <- W0
lego.COMPOSITE <- lego1536.PAN[,match(colnames(H.COMPOSITE),colnames(lego1536.PAN),nomatch=0)]
summary.COMPOSITE <- list(lego.COMPOSITE,W.COMPOSITE,H.COMPOSITE)
save(summary.COMPOSITE,file=paste(OUTPUT,"summary.COMPOSITE.RData",sep=""))
###### calculate a separate attribution of SNVs, INDELs, and DNPs
x <- get.SNV.INDEL.DNP(apply(W.COMPOSITE,2,function(x) x/sum(x)),H.COMPOSITE)
H.COMPOSITE.SNV <- x[[1]]
H.COMPOSITE.INDEL <- x[[2]]
H.COMPOSITE.DNP <- x[[3]]
WuyangFF95/SynSigRun documentation built on Oct. 7, 2022, 1:16 p.m.
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
############################################################################################
############################################################################################
#### Copyright (c) 2017, Broad Institute
#### Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
#### modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
#### met:
#### Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
#### notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
#### Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
#### notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
#### the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
#### distribution.
#### Neither the name of the Broad Institute nor the names of its
#### contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
#### from this software without specific prior written permission.
#### THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
#### "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
#### LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
#### A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
#### HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
#### SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
#### LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
#### DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
#### THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
#### (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
#### OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
##############################################################################
###### COMPOSITE SIGNATURE EXTRACTIO AND ATTRIBUTION
##############################################################################
##############################################################################
###### SIGNATURE EXTRACTION
##############################################################################
######SignatureAnalyzer applied two-step signature extraction strategy in 2,780
######PCAWG samples. First, the global signature extraction was performed for
######the low mutation burden samples (n=2624) without putative POLE and MSI
######samples, skin tumours, and one TMZ sample. Second, additional signatures
######unique to hyper-mutated samples were extracted with maintaining all
######signatures discovered in the low mutation burden-samples This approach is
######expected to minimize a "signature bleeding" or biase of hyper- or
######ultra-mutated samples on the signature extraction process and also enalbes
######key information on the signature availability i.e., the signatures found
######only in hyper-mutated samples are not allowed in low mutation
######burden-samples, while all signatures are available in hyper-mutated
######samples with no constraints.
################################################################################
################################################################################
CURRENT <- paste(getwd(),"/",sep="")
INPUT <- paste(CURRENT,"INPUT_SignatureAnalyzer/",sep="") ### Directory for INPUT data
OUTPUT <- paste(CURRENT,"OUTPUT_SignatureAnalyzer/",sep="") #### Directory for OUTPUT data
TEMPORARY <- paste(CURRENT,"TEMPORARY_SignatureAnalyzer/",sep="")
system(paste("mkdir",OUTPUT,sep=" "))
system(paste("mkdir",TEMPORARY,sep=" "))
source("SignatureAnalyzer.PCAWG.function.R")
###### loading input mutation counts matrix along 1536 SNV + 78 DNP + 83 INDEL
###### features across 2780 PCAWG samples SNV features in 1536 contexts were
###### defined as six-letters such as "CTAATT", in which first two letters
###### refers to the reference and altered bases, and next four letters
###### represent a base at -2, -1, +1, and +2 position at mutated pyrimidines (C
###### or T), e.g, C>T at AACTT penta-nucleotide sequence motif. SNV features in
###### 96 contexts were defined as four-letters such as "CTAT", in which first
###### two letters refers to the reference and altered bases, and next two
###### letters represent a base at -1 and +1 position at mutated pyrimidines (C
###### or T), e.g, C>T at ACT tri-nucleotide sequence motif.
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego1536.PAN.SNV.091217.RData",sep="")) ### SNV lego-matrix in 1536 contexts
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego96.PAN.SNV.091217.RData",sep="")) ### SNV lego-matrix in 96 contexts
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego1536.DNP.091217.RData",sep="")) ### DNP lego-matrix
load(file=paste(INPUT,"lego1536.INDEL.091217.RData",sep="")) ### INDEL lego-matrix
lego1536.PAN <- rbind(lego1536.SNV,lego1536.DNP,lego1536.INDEL)
### COMPOSITE lego-matrix in 1697 features (1536 SNV + 78 DNP + 83 INDEL)
###### loading information on hyper- or ultra-mutated samples; POLE (n=9), MSI
###### (n=39), all SKIN (n=107), and single TMZ (CNS_GBM__SP25494)
load(file=paste(INPUT,"sample.POLE.RData",sep=""))
load(file=paste(INPUT,"sample.MSI1.RData",sep=""))
load(file=paste(INPUT,"sample.remove.RData",sep=""))
sample.TMZ <- c("CNS_GBM__SP25494")
###### COMPOSITE lego matrix for PRIMARY and SECONDARY datasets
lego.PRIMARY <- lego1536.PAN[,!colnames(lego1536.PAN)%in%sample.remove]
lego.SECONDARY <- lego1536.PAN[,colnames(lego1536.PAN)%in%sample.remove]
####### First step: Signature Extraction for the PRIMARY 2624 sample set Execute
####### several Bayesian NMF runs and select the solution with the lowest value
####### of res[[4]] (-log(posterior)) at the lowest number of signatures.
####### Bayesian NMF begins with the maximum number of signatures (Kcol) and
####### irrelevant columns and rows in both W and H, respectively, are
####### iteratively removed through the automatic relevance determination
####### techinique and the final number of signatures is determined by counting
####### non-zero columns in W (res[[1]]).
if (FALSE) {
Kcol <- 50
method <- "L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_FIRST"
for (i in 1:10) {
res <- BayesNMF.L1W.L2H(as.matrix(lego.PRIMARY),200000,10,5,1.e-05,Kcol,Kcol,1)
save(res,file=paste(OUTPUT,paste(method,i,"RData",sep="."),sep=""))
}
}
####### Second step: Signature Extraction for the SECONDARY 156
####### sample set Execute several Bayesian NMF runs and select the solution with
####### the lowest value of res[[4]] (-log(posterior)) at the lowest number of
####### signatures
load(file=paste(OUTPUT,"L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_FIRST.RData",sep=""))
### loading BayesNMF solution for the primary data set (example RData file).
# Steve: W contains the signtures extracted from the "primary" data set.
W <- res[[1]]
H <- res[[2]]
index <- colSums(W) > 1 ### sum(index) is the number of signatures in the primary data set
###### All mutation burdens of the primary dataset are now included in the W
###### matrix (signature-loading) and the H matrix (activity-loading).
W <- W[,index]
H <- H[index,]
W1536.PRIMARY <- W
H1536.PRIMARY <- H
for (i in 1:ncol(W)) {
H1536.PRIMARY[i,] <- H1536.PRIMARY[i,]*colSums(W)[i]
W1536.PRIMARY[,i] <- W1536.PRIMARY[,i]*rowSums(H)[i]
# Jaegil, it looks likes this puts the sum of the mutation
# counts for signature i in the corresponding column of
# W1536.PRIMARY, correct?
}
colnames(W1536.PRIMARY) <- paste("Primary.W",seq(1:ncol(W1536.PRIMARY)),sep="")
rownames(H1536.PRIMARY) <- colnames(W1536.PRIMARY)
W1536.PRIMARY.norm <- apply(W1536.PRIMARY,2,function(x) x/sum(x)) ## Normalized primary signatures
###### PRIMARY signatures (W1536.PRIMARY) with all mutation burdens were added
###### to the muation count matrix of the secondary data set. Thus all PRIMARY
###### signatures are now treated as extra fake samples with keeping mutation
###### burdens in the PRIMARY 2624 samples. This process enforces the primary
###### signatures to be reatined in the secondary signature extraction, while
###### enablling a discovery of novel signatures unique to the second primary
###### data set.
lego.PRIMARY.SECONDARY <- cbind(W1536.PRIMARY,lego.SECONDARY)
# Jaegil, it looks like the result of the cbind will
# serve as the V matrix for the secondary extraction, correct?
method <- "L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_SECOND"
if (FALSE) {
Kcol <- 96
for (i in 1:10) {
res <- BayesNMF.L1W.L2H(as.matrix(lego.PRIMARY.SECONDARY),200000,10,5,5.e-06,Kcol,Kcol,1)
save(res,file=paste(OUTPUT,paste(method,i,"RData",sep="."),sep=""))
}
}
load(file=paste(OUTPUT,"L1W.L2H.LEGO1536.COMPOSITE_SECOND.RData",sep=""))
### loading BayesNMF solution for the primary data set (example RData file)
W <- res[[1]]
H <- res[[2]]
index <- colSums(W) > 1
### sum(index) is the number of extracted signatures in the primary data set
W <- W[,index]
H <- H[index,]
W1536.SECONDARY <- W
H1536.SECONDARY <- H
for (i in 1:ncol(W)) {
H1536.SECONDARY[i,] <- H1536.SECONDARY[i,]*colSums(W)[i]
W1536.SECONDARY[,i] <- W1536.SECONDARY[,i]*rowSums(H)[i]
}
colnames(W1536.SECONDARY) <- paste("Secondary.W",seq(1:ncol(W1536.SECONDARY)),sep="")
rownames(H1536.SECONDARY) <- colnames(W1536.SECONDARY)
W1536.SECONDARY.norm <- apply(W1536.SECONDARY,2,function(x) x/sum(x))
###### cosine similairy between W1536.SECONDARY (signatures in the second step)
###### and W1536.PRIMARY (signatures in the first step)
corr <- plot.W.correlation(W1536.SECONDARY.norm[1:1536,],W1536.PRIMARY.norm[1:1536,])
corr.max <- apply(corr,1,function(x) max(x)) ### maximum cosine similarity of secondary signatures to primary signatures
corr.id <- apply(corr,1,function(x) which.max(x)) ### primary signature ID with corr.max
###### summary data-frame mapping the signatures in the second extration step
###### to the signatures in the frist step
df.summary <- data.frame(colnames(W1536.SECONDARY),colnames(W1536.PRIMARY)[corr.id],corr.id,corr.max) ### summary for the comparison of secondary signatures to primary ones
colnames(df.summary) <- c("secondary","primary","primary.id","CS.max")
df.summary[,"CS_0.99"] <- df.summary$CS.max > 0.99
###### identify primary signatures retained in the secondary signature
###### extraction (W1536.1) and those attributions in 2624 samples (H1536.1)
W1536.1 <- W1536.PRIMARY[,match(df.summary$primary[df.summary$CS_0.99],colnames(W1536.PRIMARY),nomatch=0)]
H1536.1 <- H1536.PRIMARY[match(df.summary$primary[df.summary$CS_0.99],rownames(H1536.PRIMARY),nomatch=0),]
colnames(W1536.1) <- df.summary$secondary[df.summary$CS_0.99]
rownames(H1536.1) <- colnames(W1536.1)
###### identify signatures unique to the hyper-mutated samples (W1536.2) in the
###### secondary signature extraction and those attributions in 156 samples
###### (H1536.2.2) H1536.2.1 is a signature attribution of the primary
###### signatures in hyper-mutated samples.
W1536.2 <- W1536.SECONDARY[,!df.summary$CS_0.99]
H1536.2.1 <- H1536.SECONDARY[df.summary$CS_0.99,(ncol(W1536.PRIMARY)+1):ncol(H1536.SECONDARY)]
H1536.2.2 <- H1536.SECONDARY[!df.summary$CS_0.99,(ncol(W1536.PRIMARY)+1):ncol(H1536.SECONDARY)]
n.hyper <- ncol(W1536.2) ### # of signatures unique to hyper-mutated samples
W.tmp1 <- W1536.1
lego.tmp1 <- get.lego96.from.lego1536(W.tmp1[1:1536,]) ### get lego in 96 contexts from 1536 contexts
colnames(lego.tmp1) <- gsub("Secondary.","",colnames(lego.tmp1))
p1 <- plot.signature.SNV(lego.tmp1,"validation")
pdf(file=paste(OUTPUT,paste("signature.SNV.primary.re_ordered.pdf",sep="."),sep=""),
width=(12),height=0.75*ncol(lego.tmp1))
plot(p1) ### plotting primary signatures
dev.off()
W.tmp2 <- cbind(W1536.1,W1536.2)
lego.tmp2 <- get.lego96.from.lego1536(W.tmp2[1:1536,])
colnames(lego.tmp2) <- gsub("Secondary.","",colnames(lego.tmp2))
p2 <- plot.signature.SNV(lego.tmp2,"validation")
pdf(file=paste(OUTPUT,paste("signature.SNV.secondary.re_ordered.pdf",sep="."),sep=""),width=(12),height=0.75*ncol(lego.tmp2))
plot(p2) ### plotting all signatures (primary + secondary)
dev.off()
#################################################################################################
###### SIGNATURE ATTRIBUTION
#################################################################################################
###### SignatureAnalyzer applied a separate process for low-mutation burden and hyper-mutated samples in all COMPOSITE, SBS, DBS, and ID signature attributions.
###### The signature attribution in low-mutation burden samples was performed in each tumour type,
###### while the attribution was separately performed in MSI (n=39), POLE (n=9), skin-melanoma cohort (n=107), and a single TMZ sample.
###### In each cohort, the signature availability (e.g., which signatures are active or not in each cohort) was automatically inferred
###### through the automatic relevance determination process applied to the activity matrix H only, while fixing the signature W.
###### To prevent signatures found in hyper-mutated samples in low-mutation burden samples
###### the H matrix was element-wise-multiplied by a binary, signature indicator matrix Z (signature by samples) in every multiplication update of H.
###### Every elements of Z corresponding to the hyper-mutated signatures and low-mutation burden samples set to zero.
###### Three additional rules were applied in the SBS signature attribution to enforce biological plausibility and minimize a signature bleeding
###### (i) allow signature SBS4 (smoking signature) only in lung and head and neck cases;
###### (ii) allow signature SBS11 (TMZ signature) in a single GBM sample;
###### (iii) allow the 25 signatures found in hyper-mutated samples to be used only in hyper-mutated samples.
###### On the other hand, no other rules except that signatures found in hyper-mutated samples were not allowed in low-mutation burden-samples
###### were applied in both ID and DBS signature attributions
#################################################################################################
######################
####### Assigning attributions in the PRIMARY 2624 sample set
######################
W1536.1.norm <- apply(W1536.1,2,function(x) x/sum(x))
W1536.2.norm <- apply(W1536.2,2,function(x) x/sum(x))
W0 <- W1536.1.norm #### fixed PRIMARY W
H0 <- H1536.1 #### initialization for PRIMARY H
V0 <- lego1536.PAN[,match(colnames(H0),colnames(lego1536.PAN),nomatch=0)] #### COMPOSITE lego matrix for 2624 samples
K0 <- ncol(W0) #### # of signatures
x1 <- sapply(colnames(V0),function(x) strsplit(x,"__")[[1]][1])
x2 <- sapply(colnames(V0),function(x) strsplit(x,"__")[[1]][2])
ttype <- x1
ttype[ttype%in%c("Breast_AdenoCA","Breast_DCIS","Breast_LobularCA")] <- "Breast"
ttype[ttype%in%c("Cervix_AdenoCA","Cervix_SCC")] <- "Cervix"
ttype[ttype%in%c("Myeloid_MDS","Myeloid_MPN")] <- "Myeloid_MDS/MPN"
ttype[ttype%in%c("Bone_Benign","Bone_Epith")] <- "Bone-Other"
ttype.unique <- unique(ttype)
n.ttype.unique <- length(ttype.unique)
Z0 <- array(1,dim=c(K0,ncol(V0))) ### signature indicator matrix Z (0 = not allowed, 1 = allowed); all elements initialized by one.
colnames(Z0) <- colnames(H0)
rownames(Z0) <- rownames(H0)
Z0[11,!ttype%in%c("Head_SCC","Lung_AdenoCA","Lung_SCC")] <- 0 ### Smoking signature is only allowed in Lung and Head-neck
a0 <- 10 ### default parameter
phi <- 1.5 ### default parameter
for (i in 1:n.ttype.unique) {
#### First step: determine a set of optimal signatures best explaining the observed mutations in each cohort.
#### The automatic relevance determination technique was applied to the H matrix only, while keeping signatures (W0) frozen.
cohort <- ttype.unique[i]
W1 <- W0
V1 <- as.matrix(V0[,ttype==cohort])
Z1 <- Z0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)]
H1 <- Z1*H0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)]
lambda <- rep(1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2,K0)
res0 <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z(as.matrix(V1),as.matrix(W1),as.matrix(H1),as.matrix(Z1),lambda,2000000,a0,1.e-07,1/phi)
H2 <- res0[[2]]
colnames(H2) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H2) <- colnames(W0)
#### Second step: determine a sample-level signature attribution using selected sigantures in the first step.
index.H2 <- rowSums(H2)>1 ### identify only active signatures in the cohort
Z2 <- Z1
Z2[!index.H2,] <- 0 ### only selected signatures in the first step are allowed + the original contraints on the signature availability from Z1.
for (j in 1:ncol(H2)) {
tmpH <- rep(0,ncol(W0))
if (sum(V1[,j])>=5) {
lambda <- 1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2
res <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z.sample(as.matrix(V1[,j]),W0,as.matrix(H2[,j]),as.matrix(Z2[,j]),lambda,1000000,a0,1.e-07,1)
tmpH <- res[[2]]
}
if (j==1) {
H3 <- tmpH
} else {
H3 <- cbind(H3,tmpH)
cat(j,'\n')
}
}
colnames(H3) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H3) <- colnames(W0)
if (i==1) {
H2.all <- H2
H3.all <- H3
} else {
H2.all <- cbind(H2.all,H2)
H3.all <- cbind(H3.all,H3)
}
}
H.COMPOSITE.nohyper <- H3.all ### attributions of COMPOSITE signatures in the PRIMARY sample set
######################
####### Assigning attributions in the SECONDARY 156 sample set
######################
W0 <- cbind(W1536.1.norm,W1536.2.norm) ### fixed (PRIMARY + SECONDARY) W
H0 <- rbind(H1536.2.1,H1536.2.2) ### initialization for (PRIMARY + SECONDARY) H for 156 samples
V0 <- lego1536.PAN[,match(colnames(H0),colnames(lego1536.PAN),nomatch=0)] #### COMPOSITE lego matrix for 156 samples
K0 <- ncol(W0)
x0 <- colnames(H0)
ttype <- rep("Skin_Melanoma",length(x0))
ttype[x0%in%sample.MSI1] <- "MSI"
ttype[x0%in%sample.POLE] <- "POLE"
ttype[x0=="CNS_GBM__SP25494"] <- "TMZ"
ttype.unique <- unique(ttype)
n.ttype.unique <- length(ttype.unique)
Z0 <- array(1,dim=c(K0,ncol(V0))) ### signature indicator matrix Z (0 = not allowed, 1 = allowed); all elements initialized by one.
colnames(Z0) <- colnames(H0)
rownames(Z0) <- rownames(H0)
Z0[11,!ttype%in%c("Head_SCC","Lung_AdenoCA","Lung_SCC")] <- 0 ### Smoking signature is only allowed in Lung and Head-neck
Z0[59,!ttype=="TMZ"] <- 0 ### TMZ signature is only allowed in a single TMZ sample.
for (i in 1:n.ttype.unique) {
#### First step: determine a set of optimal signatures best explaining the observed mutations in each cohort.
#### The automatic relevance determination technique was applied to the H matrix only, while keeping signatures (W0) frozen.
cohort <- ttype.unique[i]
W1 <- W0
V1 <- as.matrix(V0[,which(ttype==cohort)])
if (cohort=="TMZ") {
colnames(V1) <- sample.TMZ
Z1 <- as.matrix(Z0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
H1 <- Z1*as.matrix(H0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
colnames(Z1) <- sample.TMZ
colnames(H1) <- sample.TMZ
}
Z1 <- as.matrix(Z0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
H1 <- Z1*as.matrix(H0[,match(colnames(V1),colnames(Z0),nomatch=0)])
lambda <- rep(1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2,K0)
res0 <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z(as.matrix(V1),as.matrix(W1),as.matrix(H1),as.matrix(Z1),lambda,2000000,a0,1.e-07,1/phi)
H2 <- res0[[2]]
colnames(H2) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H2) <- colnames(W0)
#### Second step: determine a sample-level signature attribution using selected sigantures in the first step.
index.H2 <- rowSums(H2)>1 ### identify only active signatures in the cohort
Z2 <- Z1
Z2[!index.H2,] <- 0 ### only selected signatures in the first step are allowed + the original contraints on the signature availability from Z1.
for (j in 1:ncol(H2)) {
tmpH <- rep(0,ncol(W0))
if (sum(V1[,j])>=5) {
lambda <- 1+(sqrt((a0-1)*(a0-2)*mean(V1,na.rm=T)/K0))/(nrow(V1) + ncol(V1) + a0 + 1)*2
res <- BayesNMF.L1.KL.fixed_W.Z.sample(as.matrix(V1[,j]),W0,as.matrix(H2[,j]),as.matrix(Z2[,j]),lambda,1000000,a0,1.e-07,1)
tmpH <- res[[2]]
}
if (j==1) {
H3 <- tmpH
} else {
H3 <- cbind(H3,tmpH)
cat(j,'\n')
}
}
colnames(H3) <- colnames(V1)
rownames(H3) <- colnames(W0)
if (i==1) {
H2.all <- H2
H3.all <- H3
} else {
H2.all <- cbind(H2.all,H2)
H3.all <- cbind(H3.all,H3)
}
}
H.COMPOSITE.hyper <- H3.all ### attributions of COMPOSITE signatures in the SECONDARY sample set
######################
####### Combining attributions of PIRMARY and SECONARY datasets
######################
tmp1 <- array(0,dim=c(n.hyper,ncol(H.COMPOSITE.nohyper)))
rownames(tmp1) <- colnames(W1536.2)
colnames(tmp1) <- colnames(H.COMPOSITE.nohyper)
H.COMPOSITE <- cbind(rbind(H.COMPOSITE.nohyper,tmp1),H.COMPOSITE.hyper) ### attributions of COMPOSITE signatures across 2780 samples
###### save all results: lego.COMPOSITE - original lego-matrix, W.COMPOSITE - signatures, H.COMPOSITE - attributions
W.COMPOSITE <- W0
lego.COMPOSITE <- lego1536.PAN[,match(colnames(H.COMPOSITE),colnames(lego1536.PAN),nomatch=0)]
summary.COMPOSITE <- list(lego.COMPOSITE,W.COMPOSITE,H.COMPOSITE)
save(summary.COMPOSITE,file=paste(OUTPUT,"summary.COMPOSITE.RData",sep=""))
###### calculate a separate attribution of SNVs, INDELs, and DNPs
x <- get.SNV.INDEL.DNP(apply(W.COMPOSITE,2,function(x) x/sum(x)),H.COMPOSITE)
H.COMPOSITE.SNV <- x[[1]]
H.COMPOSITE.INDEL <- x[[2]]
H.COMPOSITE.DNP <- x[[3]]
R Package Documentation
Browse R Packages
We want your feedback!
Note that we can't provide technical support on individual packages. You should contact the package authors for that.
Embedding an R snippet on your website
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.