Nothing
#' ---
#' title: Simulation based calibration for OncoBayes2
#' author: ""
#' date: "`r date()`"
#' output: html_vignette
#' params:
#' include_plots: FALSE
#' vignette: >
#' %\VignetteIndexEntry{Simulation based calibration for OncoBayes2}
#' %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
#' %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}
#' ---
#'
#+ include=FALSE
here::i_am("inst/sbc/sbc_report.R")
library(here)
library(knitr)
library(tools)
library(assertthat)
library(dplyr)
library(tidyr)
library(broom)
library(ggplot2)
theme_set(theme_bw())
source(here("inst", "sbc", "sbc_tools.R"))
knitr::opts_chunk$set(
fig.width = 1.62*4,
fig.height = 4,
cache=FALSE,
echo=FALSE
)
#'
#' This report documents the results of a simulation based calibration
#' (SBC) run for `OncoBayes2`. TODO
#'
#' The calibration data presented here has been generated at and with
#' the `OncoBayes` git version as:
cat(readLines(here("inst", "sbc", "calibration.md5")), sep="\n")
#'
#' The MD5 hash of the calibration data file presented here must match
#' the above listed MD5:
md5sum(here("inst", "sbc", "calibration.rds"))
#'
#' # Introduction
#'
#' Simulation based calibration (SBC) is a necessary condition which
#' must be met for any Bayesian analysis with proper priors. The
#' details are presented in Talts, et. al (see
#' https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06788).
#'
#' Self-consistency of any Bayesian analysis with a proper prior:
#'
#' $$ p(\theta) = \iint \mbox{d}\tilde{y} \, \mbox{d}\tilde{\theta} \, p(\theta|\tilde{y}) \, p(\tilde{y}|\tilde{\theta}) \, p(\tilde{\theta}) $$
#' $$ \Leftrightarrow p(\theta) = \iint \mbox{d}\tilde{y} \, \mbox{d}\tilde{\theta} \, p(\theta,\tilde{y},\tilde{\theta}) $$
#'
#' SBC procedure:
#'
#' Repeat $s=1, ..., S$ times:
#'
#' 1. Sample from the prior $$\tilde{\theta} \sim p(\theta)$$
#'
#' 2. Sample fake data $$\tilde{y} \sim p(y|\tilde{\theta})$$
#'
#' 3. Obtain $L$ posterior samples $$\{\theta_1, ..., \theta_L\} \sim p(\tilde{\theta}|\tilde{y})$$
#'
#' 4. Calculate the *rank* $r_s$ of the prior draw $\tilde{\theta}$ wrt to
#' the posterior sample $\{\theta_1, ..., \theta_L\} \sim p(\tilde{\theta}|\tilde{y})$ which falls into the range $[0,L]$
#' out of the possible $L+1$ ranks. The rank is calculated as
#' $$r_s = \sum_{l=1}^L \mathbb{I}[ \theta_l < \tilde{\theta}]$$
#'
#' The $S$ ranks then form a uniform $0-1$ density and the count in
#' each bin has a binomial distribution with probability of
#' $$p(r \in \mbox{Any Bin}) =\frac{(L+1)}{S}.$$
#'
#' ## Model description TODO
#'
#' The fake data simulation function returns ... TODO. Please refer to
#' the `sbc_tools.R` and `make_reference_rankhist.R` R programs for the
#' implementation details.
#'
#' The reference runs are created with $L=1023$ posterior draws for
#' each replication and a total of $S=10^4$ replications are run per
#' case. For the evaluation here the results are reduced to
#' $B=L'+1=64$ bins to ensure a sufficiently large sample size per
#' bin.
#'
calibration <- readRDS(here("inst", "sbc", "calibration.rds"))
have_raw <- file.exists(here("inst", "sbc", "calibration_data.rds"))
if(have_raw)
calibration_raw <- readRDS(here("inst", "sbc", "calibration_data.rds"))
include_plots <- TRUE
if("params" %in% ls())
include_plots <- params$include_plots
# The summary function we use here scales down the $L+1=1024$ bins to
# smaller number of rank bins. This improves the number of counts
# expected per rank bin ($S/(L+1)$) and is thus more robust in terms
# of large number laws. We choose $L=1023$ samples from the posterior
# such that we have $1024 = 2^10$ bins for the ranks. Thus any power
# of $2$ can be used to scale down the number of bins.
plot_binned <- function(cal_df) {
pl <- NULL
if(!include_plots)
return(pl)
if(!all(cal_df$count == 0)) {
S <- calibration$S
B <- calibration$B
c95 <- qbinom(c(0.025, 0.5, 0.975), S, 1 / B)
dd <- cal_df %>%
arrange(param, bin) %>%
group_by(param) %>%
mutate(ecdf = cumsum(count) / S, ecdf_ref = (bin + 1) / B) %>%
filter(!all(ecdf == 0))
nparam <- length(unique(dd$param))
if(unique(dd$partype) %in% c("mu_eta", "tau_eta")){
nc <- nparam
} else{
nc <- 2
}
nr <- max(1, ceiling(nparam / nc))
pl <- list()
pl[["hist"]] <- ggplot(dd, aes(bin, count)) +
facet_wrap(~ param, nrow = nr, ncol = nc) +
geom_col() +
geom_hline(yintercept=c95[c(1,3)], linetype=I(2)) +
geom_hline(yintercept=c95[c(2)], linetype=I(3))
pl[["ecdf_diff"]] <- ggplot(dd, aes(bin, ecdf-ecdf_ref)) +
facet_wrap(~ param, nrow = nr, ncol = nc) +
geom_step() +
geom_hline(yintercept=0, linetype=I(3))
pl
}
return(pl)
}
B <- calibration$B
S <- calibration$S
bins_all <- calibration$data %>%
tidyr::gather(key = "param", value = "count", - data_scenario, -bin) %>%
mutate(partype = sapply(strsplit(param, "[[]"), '[', 1),
group = interaction(data_scenario, partype))
cal_split <- split(bins_all, bins_all$group)
pl_split <- lapply(cal_split, function(cal_df) plot_binned(cal_df))
#' # SBC results
#'
#' ## Sampler Diagnostics Overview
#'
kable(calibration$sampler_diagnostics, digits=3)
#'
#+ include=include_plots&have_raw, eval=include_plots&have_raw, fig.width=8,fig.height=6
calibration_raw %>%
select(starts_with("min_"), "max_Rhat", starts_with("lp_"), "data_scenario") %>%
pivot_longer(!data_scenario, names_to="metric") %>%
ggplot(aes(value)) +
facet_grid(data_scenario~metric, scales="free_x") +
geom_histogram(bins=60) + xlab(NULL) +
scale_x_log10() +
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 60, vjust = 1, hjust=1)) +
ggtitle("Sampler diagnostics")
#'
#' Large Rhat is defined as exceeding $1.1$.
#'
#' ## Sampler Adaptation & Performance Overview
#'
#'
#+ include=include_plots&have_raw, eval=include_plots&have_raw
sampler_performance <- calibration_raw %>%
select("time.running", starts_with("lp_"), "stepsize", "accept_stat", "data_scenario") %>%
mutate(lp_ess_bulk_speed=lp_ess_bulk / time.running, lp_ess_tail_speed=lp_ess_tail / time.running) %>%
select("data_scenario", "stepsize", "accept_stat", ends_with("_speed"))
sampler_performance %>% group_by(data_scenario) %>%
summarize(across(where(is.numeric), list(mean=mean, sd=sd)), N=n()) %>%
relocate(data_scenario, N) %>%
kable(digits=3)
#'
#' ESS speed is in units of ESS per second.
#'
#+ include=include_plots&have_raw, eval=include_plots&have_raw, fig.width=8,fig.height=6
sampler_performance %>%
pivot_longer(!data_scenario, names_to="metric") %>%
mutate(metric=factor(metric, c("accept_stat", "stepsize", "lp_ess_bulk_speed", "lp_ess_tail_speed"))) %>%
ggplot(aes(value)) +
facet_grid(data_scenario~metric, scales="free_x") +
geom_histogram(bins=60) + xlab(NULL) +
scale_x_log10() +
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 60, vjust = 1, hjust=1)) +
ggtitle("Sampler adaptation & performance")
#'
#'
chisq <- bins_all %>%
arrange(data_scenario, partype, param, bin) %>%
group_by(data_scenario, partype, param) %>%
mutate(allna = all(count == 0)) %>%
filter(!allna) %>%
do(tidy(chisq.test(.$count))[,c(1,3,2)] ) %>%
rename(df = parameter) %>%
ungroup()
#'
#' ## $\chi^2$ Statistic, Model 1: Single-agent logistic regression
#'
kable(chisq %>% filter(data_scenario== "log2bayes_EXNEX") %>% select(-data_scenario, -partype), digits=3)
#'
#' ## $\chi^2$ Statistic, Model 2: Double combination, fully exchangeable
#'
kable(chisq %>% filter(data_scenario == "combo2_EX") %>% select(-data_scenario, -partype), digits=3)
#'
#' ## $\chi^2$ Statistic, Model 3: Double combination, EXchangeable/NonEXchangeable model
#'
kable(chisq %>% filter(data_scenario == "combo2_EXNEX") %>% select(-data_scenario, -partype), digits=3)
#'
#' ## $\chi^2$ Statistic, Model 4: Triple combination, EX/NEX model
#'
kable(chisq %>% filter(data_scenario == "combo3_EXNEX") %>% select(-data_scenario, -partype), digits=3)
#+ results="asis", include=include_plots, eval=include_plots
spin_child("sbc_report_plots.R")
#'
#' ## Session Info
#'
sessionInfo()
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.