knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, ##dev="png", dpi=50, fig.width=7.15, fig.height=5.5, out.width="600px", fig.retina=1, comment = "#>" )
Simulation of survival data is important for both theoretical and practical work. In a practical setting we might wish to validate that standard errors are valid even in a rather small sample, or validate that a more complicated procedure is doing as intended. Therefore it is useful to have simple tools for generating survival data that looks as much as possible like particular data. In a theoretical setting we often are interested in evaluating the finite sample properties of a new procedure in different settings that often are motivated by a specific practical problem. The aim is provide such tools.
Bender et al. in a nice recent paper also discussed how to generate survival data based on the Cox model, and restricted attention to some of the many useful parametric survival models (weibull, exponential).
Different survival models can be cooked, and we here give recipes for hazard and cumulative incidence based simulations. More recipes are given in vignette about recurrent events.
library(mets) options(warn=-1) set.seed(10) # to control output in simulations
Given a survival time $T$ with cumulative hazard $\Lambda(t)=\int_0^t \lambda(s) ds$, it follows that \cite{} with $E \sim Exp(1)$ (exponential with rate 1), that $\Lambda^{-1}(E)$ will have the same distribution as $T$.
This provides the basis for simulations of survival times with a given hazard and is a consequence of this simple calculation [ P(\Lambda^{-1}(E) > t) = P(E > \Lambda(t)) = \exp( - \Lambda(t)) = P(T > t). ]
Similarly if $T$ given $X$ have hazard on Cox form [ \lambda_0(t) \exp( X^T \beta) ] where $\beta$ is a $p$-dimensional regression coefficient and $\lambda_0(t)$ a baseline hazard funcion, then it is useful to observe also that $\Lambda^{-1}(E/HR)$ with $HR=\exp(X^T \beta)$ has the same distribution as $T$ given $X$.
Therefore if the inverse of the cumulative hazard can be computed we can generate survival with a specified hazard function. One useful observation is note that for a piecewise linear continuous cumulative hazard on an interval $[0,\tau]$ $\Lambda_l(t)$ it is easy to compute the inverse.
Further, we can approximate any cumulative hazard with a piecewise linear continous cumulative hazard and then simulate data according to this approximation. Recall that fitting the Cox model to data will give a piecewise constant cumulative hazard and the regression coefficients so with these at hand we can first approximate the piecewise constant "Breslow"-estimator with a linear upper (or lower bound) by simply connecting the values by straight lines.
If $T$ given $X$ have hazard on Cox form
[
\lambda_0(t) \exp( X^T \beta)
]
and we wish to generate data according to this hazard for those that are alive at time $s$, that is
draw from the distribution of $T$ given $T>s$ (all given $X$ ), then we note that
[
\Lambda_0^{-1}( \Lambda_0(s) + E/HR))
]
with $HR=\exp(X^T \beta))$ and with $E \sim Exp(1)$ has the distributiion we are after.
This is again a consequence of a simple calculation [ P_X(\Lambda^{-1}(\Lambda(s)+ E/HR) > t) = P_X(E > HR( \Lambda(t) - \Lambda(s)) ) = P_X(T>t | T>s) ]
The engine is to simulate data with a given linear cumulative hazard.
nsim <- 100 chaz <- c(0,1,1.5,2,2.1) breaks <- c(0,10, 20, 30, 40) cumhaz <- cbind(breaks,chaz) X <- rbinom(nsim,1,0.5) beta <- 0.2 rrcox <- exp(X * beta) pctime <- rchaz(cumhaz,n=nsim) pctimecox <- rchaz(cumhaz,rrcox)
Now we generate data that resemble Cox models for the bmt data
data(bmt); cox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==1)~tcell+platelet,data=bmt) cox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==2)~tcell+platelet,data=bmt) X1 <- bmt[,c("tcell","platelet")] n <- nsim xid <- sample(1:nrow(X1),n,replace=TRUE) Z1 <- X1[xid,] Z2 <- X1[xid,] rr1 <- exp(as.matrix(Z1) %*% cox1$coef) rr2 <- exp(as.matrix(Z2) %*% cox2$coef) d <- rcrisk(cox1$cum,cox2$cum,rr1,rr2) dd <- cbind(d,Z1) scox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==1)~tcell+platelet,data=dd) scox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==2)~tcell+platelet,data=dd) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) plot(cox1); plot(scox1,add=TRUE,col=2) plot(cox2); plot(scox2,add=TRUE,col=2) cbind(cox1$coef,scox1$coef,cox2$coef,scox2$coef)
Now model with no covariates and specific call of sim.base function
data(sTRACE) dtable(sTRACE,~chf+diabetes) coxs <- phreg(Surv(time,status==9)~strata(diabetes,chf),data=sTRACE) strata <- sample(0:3,nsim,replace=TRUE) simb <- sim.base(coxs$cumhaz,nsim,stratajump=coxs$strata.jumps,strata=strata) cc <- phreg(Surv(time,status)~strata(strata),data=simb) plot(coxs,col=1); plot(cc,add=TRUE,col=2)
More Cox games
cox <- coxph(Surv(time,status==9)~vf+chf+wmi,data=sTRACE) sim1 <- sim.cox(cox,nsim,data=sTRACE) cc <- coxph(Surv(time,status)~vf+chf+wmi,data=sim1) cbind(cox$coef,cc$coef) cor(sim1[,c("vf","chf","wmi")]) cor(sTRACE[,c("vf","chf","wmi")]) cox <- phreg(Surv(time, status==9)~vf+chf+wmi,data=sTRACE) sim3 <- sim.cox(cox,nsim,data=sTRACE) cc <- phreg(Surv(time, status)~vf+chf+wmi,data=sim3) cbind(cox$coef,cc$coef) plot(cox,se=TRUE); plot(cc,add=TRUE,col=2) coxs <- phreg(Surv(time,status==9)~strata(chf,vf)+wmi,data=sTRACE) sim3 <- sim.phreg(coxs,nsim,data=sTRACE) cc <- phreg(Surv(time, status)~strata(chf,vf)+wmi,data=sim3) cbind(coxs$coef,cc$coef) plot(coxs,col=1); plot(cc,add=TRUE,col=2)
More Cox games with cause specific hazards
data(bmt) # coxph cox1 <- coxph(Surv(time,cause==1)~tcell+platelet,data=bmt) cox2 <- coxph(Surv(time,cause==2)~tcell+platelet,data=bmt) coxs <- list(cox1,cox2) dd <- sim.cause.cox(coxs,nsim,data=bmt) scox1 <- coxph(Surv(time,status==1)~tcell+platelet,data=dd) scox2 <- coxph(Surv(time,status==2)~tcell+platelet,data=dd) cbind(cox1$coef,scox1$coef) cbind(cox2$coef,scox2$coef)
Stratified Cox models using phreg
## stratified with phreg cox0 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==0)~tcell+platelet,data=bmt) cox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==1)~tcell+platelet,data=bmt) cox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==2)~strata(tcell)+platelet,data=bmt) coxs <- list(cox0,cox1,cox2) dd <- sim.cause.cox(coxs,nsim,data=bmt) scox0 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==1)~tcell+platelet,data=dd) scox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==2)~tcell+platelet,data=dd) scox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==3)~strata(tcell)+platelet,data=dd) cbind(cox0$coef,scox0$coef) cbind(cox1$coef,scox1$coef) cbind(cox2$coef,scox2$coef) par(mfrow=c(1,3)) plot(cox0); plot(scox0,add=TRUE,col=2); plot(cox1); plot(scox1,add=TRUE,col=2); plot(cox2); plot(scox2,add=TRUE,col=2); cox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==1)~strata(tcell)+platelet,data=bmt) cox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==2)~tcell+strata(platelet),data=bmt) coxs <- list(cox1,cox2) dd <- sim.cause.cox(coxs,nsim,data=bmt) scox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==1)~strata(tcell)+platelet,data=dd) scox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==2)~tcell+strata(platelet),data=dd) cbind(cox1$coef,scox1$coef) cbind(cox2$coef,scox2$coef) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) plot(cox1); plot(scox1,add=TRUE); plot(cox2); plot(scox2,add=TRUE);
library(mets) n <- 100 data(bmt) bmt$bmi <- rnorm(408) dcut(bmt) <- gage~age data <- bmt cox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==1)~strata(tcell)+platelet,data=bmt) cox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==2)~strata(gage)+tcell+platelet,data=bmt) cox3 <- phreg(Surv(time,cause==0)~strata(platelet)+bmi,data=bmt) coxs <- list(cox1,cox2,cox3) dd <- sim.phregs(coxs,1000,data=bmt,extend=0.002) scox1 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==1)~strata(tcell)+platelet,data=dd) scox2 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==2)~strata(gage)+tcell+platelet,data=dd) scox3 <- phreg(Surv(time,status==3)~strata(platelet)+bmi,data=dd) cbind(coef(cox1),coef(scox1), coef(cox2),coef(scox2), coef(cox3),coef(scox3)) par(mfrow=c(1,3)) plot(scox1,col=2); plot(cox1,add=TRUE,col=1) plot(scox2,col=2); plot(cox2,add=TRUE,col=1) plot(scox3,col=2); plot(cox3,add=TRUE,col=1)
Using a hazard based simulation with delayed entry we can then simulate data from for example the general illness-death model. Here the cumulative hazards need to be specified.
First we set up some cumulative hazards, then we simulate some data and re-estimate the cumulative baselines
data(base1cumhaz) data(base4cumhaz) data(drcumhaz) dr <- drcumhaz dr2 <- drcumhaz dr2[,2] <- 1.5*drcumhaz[,2] base1 <- base1cumhaz base4 <- base4cumhaz cens <- rbind(c(0,0),c(2000,0.5),c(5110,3)) iddata <- simMultistate(nsim,base1,base1,dr,dr2,cens=cens) dlist(iddata,.~id|id<3,n=0) ### estimating rates from simulated data c0 <- phreg(Surv(start,stop,status==0)~+1,iddata) c3 <- phreg(Surv(start,stop,status==3)~+strata(from),iddata) c1 <- phreg(Surv(start,stop,status==1)~+1,subset(iddata,from==2)) c2 <- phreg(Surv(start,stop,status==2)~+1,subset(iddata,from==1)) ### par(mfrow=c(2,2)) bplot(c0) lines(cens,col=2) bplot(c3,main="rates 1-> 3 , 2->3") lines(dr,col=1,lwd=2) lines(dr2,col=2,lwd=2) ### bplot(c1,main="rate 1->2") lines(base1,lwd=2) ### bplot(c2,main="rate 2->1") lines(base1,lwd=2)
In this section we discuss how to simulate competing risks data that have a specfied cumulative incidence function. We consider for simplicity a competing risks model with two causes and denote the cumulative incidence curves as $F_1(t) = P(T < t, \epsilon=1)$ and $F_2(t) = P(T < t, \epsilon=2)$.
To generate data with the required cumulative incidence functions a simple approach is to first figure out if the subject dies and then from what cause, then finally draw the survival time according to the conditional distribution.
For simplicity we consider survival times in a fixed interval $[0,\tau]$, and first flip a coin with and probabilities $1-F_1(\tau)-F_2(\tau)$ to decide if the subject is a survivor or dies. If the subject dies we then flip a coin with probabilities $F_1(\tau)/(F_1(\tau)+F_2(\tau))$ and $F_2(\tau)/(F_1(\tau)+F_2(\tau))$ to decide if $\epsilon=1$ or $\epsilon=2$, and finally draw a $T = (\tilde F_1^{-1}(U)$ with $\tilde F_1(s) = F_1(s)/F_1(\tau)$ and $U$ is a uniform.
We again note that if $\tilde F_1(s)$ and $F_1(s)$ are piecewise linear continuous functions then the inverses are easy to compute.
We here simulate two causes of death with two binary covariates
cif1 <- cbind(c(0,10,20,100),c(0,0.1,0.15,0.2)) cif2 <- cbind(c(0,10,20,100),c(0,0.4,0.45,0.5)) n <- 100; lrr1=c(0.2,0.1); lrr2=c(0.2,0.1); cens=NULL ### A binary, L binary A <- rbinom(n,1,0.5) L <- rbinom(n,1,0.5) ### rr1 <- exp(cbind(A,L) %*% lrr1) rr2 <- exp(cbind(A,L) %*% lrr2) ## model is fine mmm<-max(rr1)*max(cif1[,2])+max(rr2)*max(cif2[,2]) mcif1 <- max(cif1[,2]) mcif2 <- max(cif2[,2]) if (mmm>1) warning(" models not satisfying sum <=1\n") ### here log-link model T1 <- simsubdist(cif1,rr1,type="cif") T2 <- simsubdist(cif2,rr2,type="cif") ### dies <- rbinom(n,1,rr1*mcif1+rr2*mcif2) sel1 <- rbinom(n,1,mcif2/(mcif1+mcif2))+1 epsilon <- dies*(sel1) T1$epsilon <- epsilon ### T1$A <- A; T1$L <- L ## times given T1$time <- T1$timecause T1$time2 <- T2$timecause T1$status <- epsilon T1 <- dtransform(T1,time=100,epsilon==0) T1 <- dtransform(T1,status=0,epsilon==0) ### T1 <- dtransform(T1,time=time2,epsilon==2) T1 <- dtransform(T1,status=2,epsilon==2) dtable(T1,~status) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) lrr1=c(0.2,0.1);lrr2=c(0.2,0.1) pcif1 <- cif(Event(time,status)~strata(A,L),T1,cause=1) pcif2 <- cif(Event(time,status)~strata(A,L),T1,cause=2) ### newd <- data.frame(expand.grid(A=0:1,L=0:1)) rr1 <- c(exp(as.matrix(newd) %*% lrr1)) rr2 <- c(exp(as.matrix(newd) %*% lrr2)) ### cifm1 <- cbind(cif1[,1],cif1[,2] %o% rr1) cifm2 <- cbind(cif2[,1],cif2[,2] %o% rr2) ### par(mfrow=c(1,2)) plot(pcif1,ylim=c(0,0.3)); matlines(cifm1[,1],cifm1[,-1],col=1,lwd=2) ### plot(pcif2,ylim=c(0,0.7)) matlines(cifm2[,1],cifm2[,-1],col=1,lwd=2)
Now assume that given covariates $F_1(t;X) = P(T < t, \epsilon=1|X)$ and $F_2(t;X) = P(T < t, \epsilon=2|X)$ are two cumulative incidence functions that satistifes the needed constraints.
Possibly $F_1(t;X) = 1 - \exp( \Lambda_1(t) \exp( X^T \beta_1)$
$F_2(t;X) = 1 - \exp( \Lambda_2(t) \exp( X^T \beta_2)$ given estimators of $\Lambda_1$ and $\lambda_2$ and $\beta_1$ and $\beta_2$.
We can obtain a piecewise linear continuous approximation, $F_1^L(t;X)$
by linearly connecting estimates $\hat F_1(t_j;X) = 1 - \exp( \hat \Lambda_1(t) \exp( X^T \hat \beta_1)$. Now with these
at hand
$F_1^L(t;X)$ and $F_2^L(t;X)$ we can generate data with these cumulative incidence functions.
Here both the cumulative incidence are on the specified form if the restriction is not important. Using sim.cifs but sim.cifs enforces the restriction. Here $F_1$ will be on the specified form, and $F_2$ not.
data(bmt) ################################################################ # simulating several causes with specific cumulatives ################################################################ cif1 <- cifreg(Event(time,cause)~tcell+age,data=bmt,cause=1) cif2 <- cifreg(Event(time,cause)~tcell+age,data=bmt,cause=2) ## dd <- sim.cifs(list(cif1,cif2),nsim,data=bmt) dds <- sim.cifsRestrict(list(cif1,cif2),nsim,data=bmt) scif1 <- cifreg(Event(time,cause)~tcell+age,data=dds,cause=1) scif2 <- cifreg(Event(time,cause)~tcell+age,data=dds,cause=2) cbind(cif1$coef,scif1$coef) cbind(cif2$coef,scif2$coef) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) plot(cif1); plot(scif1,add=TRUE,col=2) plot(cif2); plot(scif2,add=TRUE,col=2)
We assumed that $F_1(t,X) = 1-\exp( \Lambda_1(t) \exp( X^T \beta_1))$ with
$\Lambda_1(t) = \rho_1 \cdot (1-exp(-t))$ and $\beta_1 = (0,-0.1)$,
and that the other cause was given by
$F_2(t,X) = 1-\exp( \Lambda_2(t) \exp( X^T \beta_2)) ( 1 - F_1(+\infty,X))$
with $\Lambda_2(t) = \rho_2 \cdot (1-exp(-t))$ and $\beta_2 = (-0.5,0.3)$,
a parametrization that satisfies the constraint $F_1+F_2 \leq 1$.
set.seed(100) rho1 <- 0.2; rho2 <- 10 n <- nsim beta=c(0.0,-0.1,-0.5,0.3) dats <- simul.cifs(n,rho1,rho2,beta,rc=0.2) dtable(dats,~status) dsort(dats) <- ~time fg <- cifreg(Event(time,status)~Z1+Z2,data=dats,cause=1,propodds=NULL) summary(fg)
Now assume that given covariates $F_1(t;X) = P(T < t, \epsilon=1|X)$ and $F_2(t;X) = P(T < t, \epsilon=2|X)$ are two
cumulative incidence functions that satistifes the needed constraints. We wish to generate data that follows these two
piecewise linear cumulative indidence functions with delayed entry at time $s$. We should thus
generate data that follows the cumulative incidence functions
[
\tilde F_1(t,s;X)= \frac{F_1(t;X) - F_1(s;;X)}{ 1 - F_1(s;X) - F_2(s;X)}
]
and
[
\tilde F_2(t,s;X)= \frac{F_2(t;X) - F_2(s;;X)}{ 1 - F_1(s;X) - F_2(s;X)}
]
this can be done according to the recipe in the previous section.
To be specific (ignoring the $X$ in the formula)
[
F_1^{-1}( F_1(s) + U \cdot (1 - F_1(s;X) - F_2(s;X)) )
]
where $U$ is a uniform, will have distribution given by $\tilde F_1(t,s)$.
See also recurrent events vignette
data(base1cumhaz) data(base4cumhaz) data(drcumhaz) dr <- drcumhaz base1 <- base1cumhaz base4 <- base4cumhaz n <- 100 rr <- simRecurrent(n,base1,death.cumhaz=dr) ### par(mfrow=c(1,3)) showfitsim(causes=1,rr,dr,base1,base1,which=1:2) rr <- simRecurrentII(n,base1,base4,death.cumhaz=dr) dtable(rr,~death+status) par(mfrow=c(2,2)) showfitsim(causes=2,rr,dr,base1,base4,which=1:2) cumhaz <- list(base1,base1,base4) drl <- list(dr,base4) rr <- simRecurrentIII(n,cumhaz,death.cumhaz=drl) dtable(rr,~death+status) showfitsimIII(rr,cumhaz,drl)
sessionInfo()
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.