tests/testthat/test_multmixOpen.R

context("multmixOpen fitting function")
skip_on_cran()

simData <- function(lambda=1, gamma=0.5, omega=0.8, p=0.5, M=100, T=5,
                    p2=NULL, type="removal")
    {
    y <- array(NA, c(M, 3, T))
    N <- matrix(NA, M, T)
    S <- G <- matrix(NA, M, T-1)

  if(type=='removal'){
    for(i in 1:M) {
      N[i,1] <- rpois(1, lambda)

      y[i,1,1] <- rbinom(1, N[i,1], p)    # Observe some
      Nleft1 <- N[i,1] - y[i,1,1]         # Remove them
      y[i,2,1] <- rbinom(1, Nleft1, p)   # ...
      Nleft2 <- Nleft1 - y[i,2,1]
      y[i,3,1] <- rbinom(1, Nleft2, p)

    for(t in 1:(T-1)) {
        S[i,t] <- rbinom(1, N[i,t], omega)
        G[i,t] <- rpois(1, gamma)
        N[i,t+1] <- S[i,t] + G[i,t]
        y[i,1,t+1] <- rbinom(1, N[i,t+1], p)    # Observe some
        Nleft1 <- N[i,t+1] - y[i,1,t+1]         # Remove them
        y[i,2,t+1] <- rbinom(1, Nleft1, p)   # ...
        Nleft2 <- Nleft1 - y[i,2,t+1]
        y[i,3,t+1] <- rbinom(1, Nleft2, p)
        }
    }
  } else if(type == "double"){
    cp <- c(p*(1-p2), p2*(1-p), p*p2)
    for(i in 1:M) {
      N[i,1] <- rpois(1, lambda)
      y[i,,1] <- rmultinom(1, N[i,1], c(cp, 1-sum(cp)))[1:3]

    for(t in 1:(T-1)) {
        S[i,t] <- rbinom(1, N[i,t], omega)
        G[i,t] <- rpois(1, gamma)
        N[i,t+1] <- S[i,t] + G[i,t]
        y[i,,t+1] <- rmultinom(1, N[i,t+1], c(cp, 1-sum(cp)))[1:3]
        }
    }

  }

    return(list(y=matrix(y, M),N=N))
}

test_that("multmixOpen can fit removal models",{

  set.seed(123)
  simy <- simData(lambda=4, gamma=0.5, omega=0.8, p=0.5,
                M=100, T=5)

  sc <- data.frame(x1=rnorm(100))

  umf <- unmarkedFrameMMO(y=simy$y, numPrimary=5, siteCovs=sc,
                        type="removal")

  fit <- multmixOpen(~x1, ~1, ~1, ~x1, K=20, data=umf)

  expect_equivalent(coef(fit), c(1.38860,0.043406,-0.68448,
                                  1.40703,0.03174,-0.00235), tol=1e-5)

  # Check auto K setting
  fit <- expect_warning(multmixOpen(~x1, ~1, ~1, ~x1, data=umf))
  expect_false(fit@K == max(umf@y) + 20) # Wrong way

  ya <- array(umf@y, c(100, 3, 5))
  yt <- apply(ya, c(1,3), sum, na.rm=TRUE)

  expect_true(fit@K == max(yt) + 20) # correct way

  #Check predict
  pr <- predict(fit, type='lambda')
  expect_equivalent(as.numeric(pr[1,]),
                     c(3.79942,0.298279,3.25808,4.43193), tol=1e-4)

  #Check getP
  pv <- getP(fit)
  expect_equivalent(dim(pv), dim(umf@y))
  expect_equivalent(pv[1,1:3], pv[1,4:6])
  expect_equivalent(pv[1,1:3], c(0.5086598,0.2499250,0.1227982), tol=1e-5)

  #Check residuals
  r <- residuals(fit)
  expect_equivalent(r[1,1:3], c(0.067122,-0.9497006,0.533337), tol=1e-4)

  #Check simulate
  set.seed(123)
  sim <- simulate(fit, nsim=2)
  expect_equivalent(sim[[1]][3,1:3], c(3,0,0))
  expect_equivalent(dim(sim[[1]]), c(100,15))

  #Check ranef
  set.seed(123)
  ran <- ranef(fit)
  expect_equivalent(bup(ran)[1,1], 3.450738, tol=1e-5)

  #Check error when random effect in formula
  expect_error(multmixOpen(~(1|dummy), ~1, ~1, ~1, umf))
})

test_that("multmixOpen handles NAs",{

  set.seed(123)
  simy <- simData(lambda=4, gamma=0.5, omega=0.8, p=0.5,
                M=100, T=5)

  sc <- data.frame(x1=rnorm(100))
  oc <- data.frame(x2=rnorm(100*3*5))

  simy$y[1,1:3] <- NA
  simy$y[2,1] <- NA
  sc$x1[3] <- NA

  #This breaks things. I think it has to do with delta
  #probably a common issue for all open population functions
  #oc$x2[49] <- NA

  umf <- unmarkedFrameMMO(y=simy$y, numPrimary=5, siteCovs=sc,
                        obsCov=oc, type="removal")

  fit <- expect_warning(multmixOpen(~x1, ~1, ~1, ~x2, K=20, data=umf))

  expect_equivalent(coef(fit), c(1.3800182,0.0390053,
                                  -0.679937,1.398098,
                                  0.02802259,0.010705), tol=1e-4)

  # Check ranef
  set.seed(123)
  simy <- simData(lambda=4, gamma=0.5, omega=0.8, p=0.5,
                M=100, T=5)

  sc <- data.frame(x1=rnorm(100))
  oc <- data.frame(x2=rnorm(100*3*5))

  simy$y[2,1] <- NA

  umf <- unmarkedFrameMMO(y=simy$y, numPrimary=5, siteCovs=sc,
                        obsCov=oc, type="removal")

  fit <- multmixOpen(~x1, ~1, ~1, ~x2, K=20, data=umf)

  r <- ranef(fit)
  expect_true(cor(simy$N[,1], bup(r)[,1]) > 0.9)

})


test_that("multmixOpen can fit double observer models",{

  set.seed(123)
  simy <- simData(lambda=4, gamma=0.5, omega=0.8, p=0.5, p2=0.5,
                M=300, T=5, type="double")

  umf <- unmarkedFrameMMO(y=simy$y, numPrimary=5,
                          obsCovs=data.frame(x2=rnorm(300*2*5)),
                          siteCovs=data.frame(x1=rnorm(300)),
                        type="double")

  # Check that subset works
  umf2 <- umf[1:10,]
  expect_equal(numSites(umf2), 10)

  fit <- multmixOpen(~x1, ~1, ~1, ~x1, K=20, data=umf)


  expect_equivalent(coef(fit), c(1.4051,-0.04087,-0.52504,
                                  1.31978,0.072867,0.020069), tol=1e-4)

  pv <- getP(fit)
  expect_equivalent(dim(pv), dim(umf@y))
  expect_equivalent(pv[1,1:3], pv[1,4:6])

  expect_equivalent(pv[1,1:3], c(0.24951,0.24951,0.272669), tol=1e-5)

  # Check that obs cov is handled correctly
  fit2 <- multmixOpen(~x1, ~1, ~1, ~x2, K=20, data=umf)
  expect_equivalent(coef(fit2), c(1.4046, -0.04114,-0.5238,1.3198,0.07129,-0.00405),
                    tol=1e-4)

})

test_that("multmixOpen can fit negative binomial models",{

  set.seed(123)
  simy <- simData(lambda=4, gamma=0.5, omega=0.8, p=0.5,
                M=100, T=5)

  sc <- data.frame(x1=rnorm(100))

  umf <- unmarkedFrameMMO(y=simy$y, numPrimary=5, siteCovs=sc,
                        type="removal")

  fit <- multmixOpen(~x1, ~1, ~1, ~x1, K=20, mixture="NB", data=umf)

  expect_equivalent(coef(fit), c(1.38861,0.0433983,-0.68451,1.40705,
                                  0.031728,-0.002354,9.81437),tol=1e-5)

})

test_that("pop dynamics work with multmixOpen",{

  set.seed(123)
  simy <- simData(lambda=4, gamma=2, omega=0.5, p=0.5,
                M=100, T=5)

  sc <- data.frame(x1=rnorm(100))
  oc <- data.frame(x2=rnorm(100*3*5))

  umf <- unmarkedFrameMMO(y=simy$y, numPrimary=5, siteCovs=sc,
                        obsCov=oc, type="removal")

  fm <- multmixOpen(~1, ~1, ~1, ~1, data = umf, K=25, dynamics="notrend")
  expect_equivalent(coef(fm), c(1.35929,-0.18441,-0.041613), tol=1e-4)

  fm <- multmixOpen(~1, ~1, ~1, ~1, data = umf, K=25, dynamics="trend")
  expect_equivalent(coef(fm), c(1.43740,-0.01538,-0.22348), tol=1e-5)

  fm <- multmixOpen(~1, ~1, ~1, ~1, data = umf, K=25, dynamics="autoreg")
  expect_equivalent(coef(fm), c(1.45539,-0.76353,0.075356,-0.277835), tol=1e-5)

  #Sketchy estimates
  #Maybe just because data were simulated using a different process?
  #Leaving these in for now just to make sure they run without errors
  fm <- multmixOpen(~1, ~1, ~1, ~1, data = umf, K=25, dynamics="gompertz")
  expect_warning(fm <- multmixOpen(~1, ~1, ~1, ~1, data = umf, K=25, dynamics="ricker"))
})
rbchan/unmarked documentation built on April 3, 2024, 10:11 p.m.