RAINBOWR: Reliable Association INference By Optimizing Weights with R

knitr::opts_chunk$set(
  collapse = TRUE,
  comment = "#>",
  fig.dpi=96
)

NOTE!!!!

The paper for RAINBOWR has been published in PLOS Computational Biology (https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007663). If you use this RAINBOWR in your paper, please cite RAINBOWR as follows:
The stable version for RAINBOWR package is now available at the CRAN (Comprehensive R Archive Network).
Please check the change in RAINBOWR with the version update from NEWS.md.

In this repository, the R package RAINBOWR is available. Here, we describe how to install and how to use RAINBOWR.


What is RAINBOWR

RAINBOWR(Reliable Association INference By Optimizing Weights with R) is a package to perform several types of GWAS as follows.

RAINBOWR also offers some functions to solve the linear mixed effects model.

By utilizing these functions, you can estimate the genomic heritability and perform genomic prediction (GP).

Finally, RAINBOWR offers other useful functions.

Installation

The stable version of RAINBOWR is now available at the CRAN (Comprehensive R Archive Network). The latest version of RAINBOWR is also available at the KosukeHamazaki/RAINBOWR repository in the GitHub, so please run the following code in the R console.

#### Stable version of RAINBOWR ####
install.packages("RAINBOWR")  


#### Latest version of RAINBOWR ####
### If you have not installed yet, ...
install.packages("devtools")  

### Install RAINBOWR from GitHub
devtools::install_github("KosukeHamazaki/RAINBOWR")

If you get some errors via installation, please check if the following packages are correctly installed. (We removed a dependency on rgl package!)

In RAINBOWR, since part of the code is written in Rcpp (C++ in R), please check if you can use C++ in R. For Windows users, you should install Rtools.

If you have some questions about installation, please contact us by e-mail (hamazaki@ut-biomet.org).

Usage

First, import RAINBOWR package and load example datasets. These example datasets consist of marker genotype (scored with {-1, 0, 1}, 1,536 SNP chip (Zhao et al., 2010; PLoS One 5(5): e10780)), map with physical position, and phenotypic data (Zhao et al., 2011; Nature Communications 2:467). Both datasets can be downloaded from Rice Diversity homepage (http://www.ricediversity.org/data/). Also, the dataset includes a list of haplotype blocks from the version 0.1.30. This list was estimated by the PLINK 1.9 (Taliun et al., 2014; BMC Bioinformatics, 15).

``` {r, include=TRUE}

Import RAINBOWR

require(RAINBOWR)

Load example datasets

data("Rice_Zhao_etal") Rice_geno_score <- Rice_Zhao_etal$genoScore Rice_geno_map <- Rice_Zhao_etal$genoMap Rice_pheno <- Rice_Zhao_etal$pheno Rice_haplo_block <- Rice_Zhao_etal$haploBlock

View each dataset

See(Rice_geno_score) See(Rice_geno_map) See(Rice_pheno) See(Rice_haplo_block)

You can check the original data format by `See` function.
Then, select one trait (here, `Flowering.time.at.Arkansas`) for example.

``` {r, include=TRUE}
### Select one trait for example
trait.name <- "Flowering.time.at.Arkansas"
y <- Rice_pheno[, trait.name, drop = FALSE]

For GWAS, first you can remove SNPs whose MAF <= 0.05 by MAF.cut function.

``` {r, include=TRUE}

Remove SNPs whose MAF <= 0.05

x.0 <- t(Rice_geno_score) MAF.cut.res <- MAF.cut(x.0 = x.0, map.0 = Rice_geno_map) x <- MAF.cut.res$x map <- MAF.cut.res$map

Next, we estimate additive genomic relationship matrix (GRM) by using `calcGRM` function.

``` {r, include=TRUE}
### Estimate genomic relationship matrix (GRM) 
K.A <- calcGRM(genoMat = x)

Next, we modify these data into the GWAS format of RAINBOWR by modify.data function.

``` {r, include=TRUE}

Modify data

modify.data.res <- modify.data(pheno.mat = y, geno.mat = x, map = map, return.ZETA = TRUE, return.GWAS.format = TRUE) pheno.GWAS <- modify.data.res$pheno.GWAS geno.GWAS <- modify.data.res$geno.GWAS ZETA <- modify.data.res$ZETA

View each data for RAINBOWR

See(pheno.GWAS) See(geno.GWAS) str(ZETA)

`ZETA` is a list of genomic relationship matrix (GRM) and its design matrix.

Finally, we can perform `GWAS` using these data.
First, we perform single-SNP GWAS by `RGWAS.normal` function as follows.

``` {r, include=TRUE}
### Perform single-SNP GWAS
normal.res <- RGWAS.normal(pheno = pheno.GWAS, geno = geno.GWAS,
                           plot.qq = FALSE, plot.Manhattan = FALSE,
                           ZETA = ZETA, n.PC = 4, P3D = TRUE, 
                           skip.check = TRUE, count = FALSE)
See(normal.res$D)  ### Column 4 contains -log10(p) values for markers

``` {r, echo=FALSE} qq(normal.res$D[, 4]) manhattan(normal.res$D)

Automatically draw Q-Q plot and Manhattan if you set plot.qq = TRUE and plot.Manhattan = TRUE.

Next, we perform SNP-set GWAS by `RGWAS.multisnp` function.

``` {r, include=TRUE, message=FALSE}
### Perform SNP-set GWAS (by regarding 11 SNPs as one SNP-set, first 300 SNPs)
SNP_set.res <- RGWAS.multisnp(pheno = pheno.GWAS, geno = geno.GWAS[1:300, ], ZETA = ZETA,
                              plot.qq = FALSE, plot.Manhattan = FALSE, count = FALSE,
                              n.PC = 4, test.method = "LR", kernel.method = "linear",
                              gene.set = NULL, skip.check = TRUE, 
                              test.effect = "additive", window.size.half = 5, window.slide = 11)

See(SNP_set.res$D)  ### Column 4 contains -log10(p) values for markers

``` {r, echo=FALSE} qq(SNP_set.res$D[, 4]) manhattan(SNP_set.res$D)

Automatically draw Q-Q plot and Manhattan if you set plot.qq = TRUE and plot.Manhattan = TRUE.

You can perform SNP-set GWAS with sliding window by setting `window.slide = 1`.
You can perform SNP-set GWAS with sliding window by setting `window.slide = 1`.
And you can also perform gene-set (or haplotype-block based) GWAS by assigning the following data set to `gene.set` argument. (You can check the example also by `See(Rice_haplo_block)` in R.)

ex.)

|  gene (or haplotype block)   |  marker | 
| :-----: | :------:| 
| haploblock_1    | id1005261 | 
| haploblock_1    | id1005263 | 
| haploblock_2    | id1009557 | 
| haploblock_2    | id1009616 | 
| haploblock_3    | id1020154 | 
| ...    | ... | 



``` {r, include=TRUE, message=FALSE}
### Perform haplotype-block based GWAS (by using hapltype blocks estimated by PLINK, first 400 SNPs)
haplo_block.res <- RGWAS.multisnp(pheno = pheno.GWAS, geno = geno.GWAS[1:400, ], ZETA = ZETA,
                              plot.qq = FALSE, plot.Manhattan = FALSE, count = FALSE,
                              n.PC = 4, test.method = "LR", kernel.method = "linear", 
                              gene.set = Rice_haplo_block, skip.check = TRUE, 
                              test.effect = "additive")

See(haplo_block.res$D)  ### Column 4 contains -log10(p) values for markers

``` {r, echo=FALSE} qq(haplo_block.res$D[, 4]) manhattan(haplo_block.res$D)

Automatically draw Q-Q plot and Manhattan if you set plot.qq = TRUE and plot.Manhattan = TRUE.

```

There is no significant block for this dataset because the number of markers and blocks is too small for this dataset. However, when whole-genome sequencing data is available, the impact of using SNP-set/gene-set/haplotype-block methods becomes larger and we strongly recommend you use these methods. Please see Hamazaki and Iwata (2020, PLOS Comp Biol) for more details of the features of these methods.

Help

If you have some help before performing GWAS with RAINBOWR, please see the help for each function by ?function_name.

References

Kennedy, B.W., Quinton, M. and van Arendonk, J.A. (1992) Estimation of effects of single genes on quantitative traits. J Anim Sci. 70(7): 2000-2012.

Storey, J.D. and Tibshirani, R. (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 100(16): 9440-9445.

Yu, J. et al. (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet. 38(2): 203-208.

Kang, H.M. et al. (2008) Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping. Genetics. 178(3): 1709-1723.

Kang, H.M. et al. (2010) Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 42(4): 348-354.

Zhang, Z. et al. (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 42(4): 355-360.

Endelman, J.B. (2011) Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP. Plant Genome J. 4(3): 250.

Endelman, J.B. and Jannink, J.L. (2012) Shrinkage Estimation of the Realized Relationship Matrix. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2(11): 1405-1413.

Su, G. et al. (2012) Estimating Additive and Non-Additive Genetic Variances and Predicting Genetic Merits Using Genome-Wide Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers. PLoS One. 7(9): 1-7.

Zhou, X. and Stephens, M. (2012) Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet. 44(7): 821-824.

Listgarten, J. et al. (2013) A powerful and efficient set test for genetic markers that handles confounders. Bioinformatics. 29(12): 1526-1533.

Lippert, C. et al. (2014) Greater power and computational efficiency for kernel-based association testing of sets of genetic variants. Bioinformatics. 30(22): 3206-3214.

Jiang, Y. and Reif, J.C. (2015) Modeling epistasis in genomic selection. Genetics. 201(2): 759-768.

Hamazaki, K. and Iwata, H. (2020) RAINBOW: Haplotype-based genome-wide association study using a novel SNP-set method. PLOS Computational Biology, 16(2): e1007663.



Try the RAINBOWR package in your browser

Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.

RAINBOWR documentation built on Sept. 12, 2023, 9:08 a.m.