Description Usage Arguments Details Value Note Author(s) References See Also Examples
This function fits the Huff model with a given interaction matrix by optimizing the attractivity values of suppliers/locations iteratively and calculates the market shares/market areas
1 2 3 4 |
huffdataset |
an interaction matrix which is a |
origins |
the column in the interaction matrix |
locations |
the column in the interaction matrix |
attrac |
the column in the interaction matrix |
dist |
the column in the interaction matrix |
lambda |
a single numeric value of λ for the (exponential) weighting of distance (transport costs, default: -2) |
dtype |
Type of distance weighting function: |
lambda2 |
if |
localmarket_dataset |
A |
origin_id |
the column in the dataset |
localmarket |
the column in the dataset |
location_dataset |
A |
location_id |
the column in the dataset |
location_total |
the column in the dataset |
tolerance |
accepted value of absolute percentage error between observed (T_{j,obs}) and modeled total values (T_{j,exp}) to skip a local optimization of location/supplier j |
iterations |
a single numeric value for the desired number of iterations |
output |
Type of function output: |
show_proc |
logical argument that indicates if the function prints messages about the state of process during the work (e.g. “Processing variable xyz ...” or “Variable xyz is regarded as dummy variable”). Default: |
check_df |
logical argument that indicates if the given dataset is checked for correct input, only for internal use, should not be deselected (default: |
In many cases, only total empirical values of the suppliers/locations can be used for market area estimation. This function fits the Huff model not by estimating the parameters but by optimizing the attraction variable (transport cost weighting by λ is given) using an optimization algorithm based on the idea of the local optimization of attraction algorithm developed by Guessefeldt (2002) and other model fit approaches. The fitting process in the huff.fit
includes of given number of (m) iterations, while the fit gets better with every iteration. The algorithm results can be evaluated by several diagnosis criteria which have been frequently used to evaluate Huff model results: Besides the sum of squared residuals, the function also calculates a Pseudo-R-squared measure and the MAPE (mean average percentage error), both used by De Beule et al. (2014), and the global error used by Klein (1988).
The function output can be controlled by the function argument output
. If output = "matrix"
the function returns a Huff interaction matrix with the optimized attractivity values and the expected market shares/market areas. If output = "total"
, the old (observed) and the new (expected) total values are returned. If output = "diag"
, the diagnosis results (fitting measures) are returned. All results are data.frame
.
Note that the iterations can be time-consuming and depend on the number of suppliers/locations. Use show_proc = TRUE
for monitoring the iteration process.
Thomas Wieland
De Beule, M./Van den Poel, D./Van de Weghe, N. (2014): “An extended Huff-model for robustly benchmarking and predicting retail network performance”. In: Applied Geography, 46, 1, p. 80-89.
Guessefeldt, J. (2002): “Zur Modellierung von raeumlichen Kaufkraftstroemen in unvollkommenen Maerkten”. In: Erdkunde, 56, 4, p. 351-370.
Klein, R. (1988): “Der Lebensmittel-Einzelhandel im Raum Verden. Raeumliches Einkaufsverhalten unter sich wandelnden Bedingungen”. Flensburger Arbeitspapiere zur Landeskunde und Raumordnung, 6. Flensburg.
Wieland, T. (2015): “Nahversorgung im Kontext raumoekonomischer Entwicklungen im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel - Konzeption und Durchfuehrung einer GIS-gestuetzten Analyse der Strukturen des Lebensmitteleinzelhandels und der Nahversorgung in Freiburg im Breisgau”. Projektbericht. Goettingen : GOEDOC, Dokumenten- und Publikationsserver der Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen. http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/pub/mon/2015/5-wieland.pdf
huff.attrac
, huff.shares
, huff.decay
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | data(Freiburg1)
data(Freiburg2)
data(Freiburg3)
# Loading the three Freiburg datasets
# NOTE: This may take a while!
# huff_total_opt2 <- huff.fit(Freiburg1, "district", "store", "salesarea", "distance",
# lambda = -2, dtype= "pow", lambda2 = NULL, Freiburg2, "district", "ppower",
# Freiburg3, "store", "annualsales", tolerance = 1, iterations = 2, output = "total",
# show_proc = TRUE)
# 2 iterations of the optimization algorithm with an accepted difference of +/- 1 %
# Output of total sales/shares, stored in dataset huff_total_opt10
# model.fit(huff_total_opt2$total_obs, huff_total_opt2$sum_E_j, plotVal = TRUE)
# total_obs = observed total values, originally from dataset Freiburg3
# sum_E_j = expected total values
|
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.