| do.cca | R Documentation |
Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is similar to Partial Least Squares (PLS), except for one objective; while PLS focuses on maximizing covariance, CCA maximizes the correlation. This difference sometimes incurs quite distinct results compared to PLS. For algorithm aspects, we used recursive gram-schmidt orthogonalization in conjunction with extracting projection vectors under eigen-decomposition formulation, as the problem dimension matters only up to original dimensionality.
do.cca(data1, data2, ndim = 2)
data1 |
an |
data2 |
an |
ndim |
an integer-valued target dimension. |
a named list containing
an (n\times ndim) matrix of projected observations from data1.
an (n\times ndim) matrix of projected observations from data2.
a (N\times ndim) whose columns are loadings for data1.
a (M\times ndim) whose columns are loadings for data2.
a list containing information for out-of-sample prediction for data1.
a list containing information for out-of-sample prediction for data2.
a vector of eigenvalues for iterative decomposition.
Kisung You
hotelling_relations_1936Rdimtools
do.pls
## generate 2 normal data matrices
set.seed(100)
mat1 = matrix(rnorm(100*12),nrow=100)+10 # 12-dim normal
mat2 = matrix(rnorm(100*6), nrow=100)-10 # 6-dim normal
## project onto 2 dimensional space for each data
output = do.cca(mat1, mat2, ndim=2)
## visualize
opar <- par(no.readonly=TRUE)
par(mfrow=c(1,2))
plot(output$Y1, main="proj(mat1)")
plot(output$Y2, main="proj(mat2)")
par(opar)
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.