Ma (2006) proposed the percent exceeding the median, defined as the proportion of observations in phase B that improve upon the median of phase A. Ma (2006) did not specify an effect size parameter corresponding to this index.
For an outcome where increase is desirable,
$$ \text{PEM} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^n \left[ I(y^B_j > m_A) + 0.5 \times I(y^B_j = m_A) \right], $$
where $m_A = \text{median}(y^A_1,...,y^A_m)$. For an outcome where decrease is desirable,
$$ \text{PEM} = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^n \left[ I(y^B_j < y^A_{(1)}) + 0.5 \times I(y^B_j = m_A) \right]. $$
The sampling distribution of PEM has not been described, and so standard errors and confidence intervals are not available.
Ma, H.-H. (2006). An alternative method for quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches: Percentage of data points exceeding the median. Behavior Modification, 30(5), 598–617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0145445504272974
Any scripts or data that you put into this service are public.
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.