exppower.TOST | R Documentation |
Calculates the so-called expected, i.e., unconditional, power for a variety of study designs used in bioequivalence studies.
exppower.TOST(alpha = 0.05, logscale = TRUE, theta0, theta1, theta2,
CV, n, design = "2x2", robust = FALSE,
prior.type = c("CV", "theta0", "both"), prior.parm = list(),
method = c("exact", "approx"))
alpha |
Significance level (one-sided). Commonly set to 0.05. |
logscale |
Should the data be used on log-transformed or on original scale? |
theta0 |
Assumed ‘true’ (or ‘observed’ in case of |
theta1 |
Lower (bio-)equivalence limit. |
theta2 |
Upper (bio-)equivalence limit. |
CV |
In case of In case of cross-over studies this is the within-subject CV, in case of a parallel-group design the CV of the total variability. |
n |
Number of subjects under study. |
design |
Character string describing the study design. See known.designs for designs covered in this package. |
robust |
Defaults to |
prior.type |
Specifies which parameter uncertainty should be accounted for. In case of
|
prior.parm |
A list of parameters expressing the prior information about the
variability and/or treatment effect. Possible components are |
method |
Defaults to |
This function calculates the so-called expected power taking into account that usually the parameters (CV and/or theta0) are not known but estimated from a prior study with some uncertainty. The expected power is an unconditional power and can therefore be seen as probability for success. See references for further details.
The prior.parm
argument is a list that can supply any of the following
components:
df
Error degrees of freedom from the prior trial (>4, maybe non-integer).
df = Inf
is allowed and for method = "exact"
the result will then
coincide with power.TOST(...)
.
Note: This corresponds to the df of both the CV and the difference of means.
SEM
Standard error of the difference of means from the prior trial; must always be on additive scale (i.e., usually log-scale).
m
Number of subjects from prior trial. Specification is analogous to
the main argument n
.
design
Study design of prior trial. Specification is analogous to the
main argument design
.
For prior.parm
, the combination consisting of df
and SEM
requires a somewhat advanced knowledge of the prior trial (provided in the raw
output from for example the software SAS, or may be obtained via
emmeans
of package emmeans
.
However, it has the advantage that if there were
missing data the exact degrees of freedom and standard error of the difference
can be used, the former possibly being non-integer valued (e.g., if the
Kenward-Roger method was used).
Details on argument prior.type
:
CV
The expectation is calculated with respect to the Inverse-gamma distribution.
theta0
The expectation is calculated with respect to the
conditional distribution theta0 | \sigma^2
= s^2
of the posteriori distribution of (theta0, \sigma^2
) from the prior
trial.
both
The expectation is calculated with respect to the posteriori
distribution of (theta0, \sigma^2
) from the prior trial. Numerical calculation
of the two-dimensional integral is performed via hcubature
.
Value of expected power according to the input.
B. Lang (thanks to G. Nehmiz for the helpful discussions), D. Labes
Grieve AP. Confidence Intervals and Sample Sizes. Biometrics. 1991;47:1597–603. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.2307/2532411")}
O’Hagan, Stevens, JW, Campell MJ. Assurance in Clinical Trial Design. Pharm Stat. 2005;4:187–201. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/pst.175")}
Julious SA, Owen RJ. Sample size calculations for clinical studies allowing for uncertainty in variance. Pharm Stat. 2006;5:29–37. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/pst.197")}
Julious SA. Sample sizes for Clinical Trials. Boca Raton: CRC Press / Chapman & Hall; 2010.
Bertsche A, Nehmitz G, Beyersmann J, Grieve AP. The predictive distribution of the residual variability in the linear-fixed effects model for clinical cross-over trials. Biom J. 2016;58(4):797–809. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/bimj.201500245")}
Box GEP, Tiao GC. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 1992.
Held L, Sabanes Bove D. Applied Statistical Inference. Likelihood and Bayes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1007/978-3-642-37887-4")}
Senn S. Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2nd edition 2002.
Zierhut ML, Bycott P, Gibbs MA, Smith BP, Vicini P. Ignorance is not bliss: Statistical power is not probability of trial success. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;99:356–9. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/cpt.257")}
expsampleN.TOST, power.TOST
# Expected power for a 2x2 crossover with 40 subjects
# CV 30% known from a pilot 2x2 study with 12 subjects
# using all the defaults for other parameters (theta0 carved in stone)
exppower.TOST(CV = 0.3, n = 40, prior.parm = list(df = 12-2))
# should give: [1] 0.7365519
# or equivalently
exppower.TOST(CV = 0.3, n = 40, prior.parm = list(m = 12, design = "2x2"))
# In contrast: Julious approximation
exppower.TOST(CV = 0.3, n = 40, prior.parm = list(df = 10), method = "approx")
# should give: [1] 0.7359771
# Compare this to the usual (conditional) power (CV known, "carved in stone")
power.TOST(CV = 0.3, n = 40)
# should give: [1] 0.8158453
# same as if setting df = Inf in function exppower.TOST()
exppower.TOST(CV = 0.3, n = 40, prior.parm = list(df = Inf))
# Expected power for a 2x2 crossover with 40 subjects
# CV 30% and theta0 = 0.95 known from a pilot 2x2 study with 12 subjects
# using uncertainty with respect to both CV and theta0
exppower.TOST(CV = 0.3, theta0 = 0.95, n = 40,
prior.parm = list(m = 12, design = "2x2"), prior.type = "both")
# should give [1] 0.5114685
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.