View source: R/power_doseprop.R
power.dp | R Documentation |
Calculates the power of dose-proportionality studies using the power model for crossover (Latin square) or parallel group designs via a confidence interval equivalence criterion.
power.dp(alpha = 0.05, CV, doses, n, beta0, theta1 = 0.8, theta2 = 1/theta1,
design = c("crossover", "parallel", "IBD"), dm = NULL, CVb)
alpha |
Type 1 error. Commonly set to 0.05. |
CV |
Coefficient of variation for intra-subject variability if |
doses |
Vector of dose levels. At least two doses have to be given. |
n |
Number of subjects. Is total number if given as scalar, else number of subjects
in the (sequence) groups. In the latter case the length of n vector has to be
the same as length of vector doses. |
beta0 |
‘True’ slope of power model. If missing defaults to |
theta1 |
Lower acceptance limit for the ratio of dose normalized means (Rdmn). |
theta2 |
Upper acceptance limit for the ratio of dose normalized means (Rdmn). |
design |
Crossover design (default), parallel group design or incomplete block design (IBD). |
dm |
'Design matrix' of the incomplete block design (IBD) if |
CVb |
Coefficient of variation of the between-subject variability. |
The power calculations are based on TOST for testing equivalence of the slope
of the power model with alternativ hypothesis slope = 1.
Power is calculated via non-central t-approximation only.
The calculations are based on mixed effects model (random intercept aka
random subject effect). For design="cossover"
or design="parallel"
the results coincide with all-effects-fixed model.
Value of power according to the input arguments.
This function is ‘experimental’ only since it is not thorougly tested yet.
Especially for design="IBD"
reliable test cases are missing.
D. Labes
Patterson S, Jones B. Bioequivalence and Statistics in Clinical Pharmacology. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC: 2006. p. 239.
(contains presumably a bug)
Sethuraman VS, Leonov S, Squassante L, Mitchell TR, Hale MD. Sample size calculation for the Power Model for dose proportionality studies. Pharm Stat. 2007;6(1):35–41. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/pst.241")}
Hummel J, McKendrick S, Brindley C, French R. Exploratory assessment of dose proportionality: review of current approaches and proposal for a practical criterion. Pharm. Stat. 2009;8(1):38–49. \Sexpr[results=rd]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1002/pst.326")}
sampleN.dp
, bib.CL
# using all the defaults, i.e. latin square crossover design, alpha=0.05,
# beta0=1+log(0.95)/log(rd), theta1=0.8, theta2=1.25
power.dp(CV = 0.2, doses = c(1,2,8), n = 15)
#
# period balanced IBD with 3 doses, 2 periods and 3 sequences,
ibd <- matrix(c(1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1), nrow = 3, ncol = 2)
power.dp(CV = 0.2, doses = c(1,2,8), n = 12, design = "IBD", dm = ibd)
# considerably lower than 3x3 Latin square
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.