fisher.test: Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data

Fisher's Exact Test for Count Data

Description

Performs Fisher's exact test for testing the null of independence of rows and columns in a contingency table with fixed marginals.

Usage

fisher.test(x, y = NULL, workspace = 200000, hybrid = FALSE,
            hybridPars = c(expect = 5, percent = 80, Emin = 1),
            control = list(), or = 1, alternative = "two.sided",
            conf.int = TRUE, conf.level = 0.95,
            simulate.p.value = FALSE, B = 2000)

Arguments

Details

If x is a matrix, it is taken as a two-dimensional contingency table, and hence its entries should be nonnegative integers. Otherwise, both x and y must be vectors of the same length. Incomplete cases are removed, the vectors are coerced into factor objects, and the contingency table is computed from these.

For 2 by 2 cases, p-values are obtained directly using the (central or non-central) hypergeometric distribution. Otherwise, computations are based on a C version of the FORTRAN subroutine FEXACT which implements the network developed by Mehta and Patel (1983, 1986) and improved by Clarkson, Fan and Joe (1993). The FORTRAN code can be obtained from https://www.netlib.org/toms/643. Note this fails (with an error message) when the entries of the table are too large. (It transposes the table if necessary so it has no more rows than columns. One constraint is that the product of the row marginals be less than 2^31 - 1.)

For 2 by 2 tables, the null of conditional independence is equivalent to the hypothesis that the odds ratio equals one. ‘Exact’ inference can be based on observing that in general, given all marginal totals fixed, the first element of the contingency table has a non-central hypergeometric distribution with non-centrality parameter given by the odds ratio (Fisher, 1935). The alternative for a one-sided test is based on the odds ratio, so alternative = "greater" is a test of the odds ratio being bigger than or.

Two-sided tests are based on the probabilities of the tables, and take as ‘more extreme’ all tables with probabilities less than or equal to that of the observed table, the p-value being the sum of such probabilities.

For larger than 2 by 2 tables and hybrid = TRUE, asymptotic chi-squared probabilities are only used if the ‘Cochran conditions’ (or modified version thereof) specified by hybridPars = c(expect = 5, percent = 80, Emin = 1) are satisfied, that is if no cell has expected counts less than 1 (= Emin) and more than 80% (= percent) of the cells have expected counts at least 5 (= expect), otherwise the exact calculation is used. A corresponding if() decision is made for all sub-tables considered. Accidentally, R has used 180 instead of 80 as percent, i.e., hybridPars[2] in R versions between 3.0.0 and 3.4.1 (inclusive), i.e., the 2nd of the hybridPars (all of which used to be hard-coded previous to R 3.5.0). Consequently, in these versions of R, hybrid=TRUE never made a difference.

In the r x c case with r > 2 or c > 2, internal tables can get too large for the exact test in which case an error is signalled. Apart from increasing workspace sufficiently, which then may lead to very long running times, using simulate.p.value = TRUE may then often be sufficient and hence advisable.

Simulation is done conditional on the row and column marginals, and works only if the marginals are strictly positive. (A C translation of the algorithm of Patefield (1981) is used.)

Value

A list with class "htest" containing the following components:

References

Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley. Pages 59–66.

Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. Second edition. New York: Wiley. Pages 91–101.

Fisher, R. A. (1935). The logic of inductive inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 98, 39–54. \Sexpr[results=rd,stage=build]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.2307/2342435")}.

Fisher, R. A. (1962). Confidence limits for a cross-product ratio. Australian Journal of Statistics, 4, 41. \Sexpr[results=rd,stage=build]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1111/j.1467-842X.1962.tb00285.x")}.

Fisher, R. A. (1970). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver & Boyd.

Mehta, Cyrus R. and Patel, Nitin R. (1983). A network algorithm for performing Fisher's exact test in r x c contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 427–434. \Sexpr[results=rd,stage=build]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1080/01621459.1983.10477989")}.

Mehta, C. R. and Patel, N. R. (1986). Algorithm 643: FEXACT, a FORTRAN subroutine for Fisher's exact test on unordered r x c contingency tables. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 12, 154–161. \Sexpr[results=rd,stage=build]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1145/6497.214326")}.

Clarkson, D. B., Fan, Y. and Joe, H. (1993) A Remark on Algorithm 643: FEXACT: An Algorithm for Performing Fisher's Exact Test in r x c Contingency Tables. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 19, 484–488. \Sexpr[results=rd,stage=build]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1145/168173.168412")}.

Patefield, W. M. (1981). Algorithm AS 159: An efficient method of generating r x c tables with given row and column totals. Applied Statistics, 30, 91–97. \Sexpr[results=rd,stage=build]{tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.2307/2346669")}.

See Also

chisq.test

fisher.exact in package exact2x2 for alternative interpretations of two-sided tests and confidence intervals for 2 by 2 tables.

Examples

## Agresti (1990, p. 61f; 2002, p. 91) Fisher's Tea Drinker
## A British woman claimed to be able to distinguish whether milk or
##  tea was added to the cup first.  To test, she was given 8 cups of
##  tea, in four of which milk was added first.  The null hypothesis
##  is that there is no association between the true order of pouring
##  and the woman's guess, the alternative that there is a positive
##  association (that the odds ratio is greater than 1).
TeaTasting <-
matrix(c(3, 1, 1, 3),
       nrow = 2,
       dimnames = list(Guess = c("Milk", "Tea"),
                       Truth = c("Milk", "Tea")))
fisher.test(TeaTasting, alternative = "greater")
## => p = 0.2429, association could not be established

## Fisher (1962, 1970), Criminal convictions of like-sex twins
Convictions <- matrix(c(2, 10, 15, 3), nrow = 2,
	              dimnames =
	       list(c("Dizygotic", "Monozygotic"),
		    c("Convicted", "Not convicted")))
Convictions
fisher.test(Convictions, alternative = "less")
fisher.test(Convictions, conf.int = FALSE)
fisher.test(Convictions, conf.level = 0.95)$conf.int
fisher.test(Convictions, conf.level = 0.99)$conf.int

## A r x c table  Agresti (2002, p. 57) Job Satisfaction
Job <- matrix(c(1,2,1,0, 3,3,6,1, 10,10,14,9, 6,7,12,11), 4, 4,
           dimnames = list(income = c("< 15k", "15-25k", "25-40k", "> 40k"),
                     satisfaction = c("VeryD", "LittleD", "ModerateS", "VeryS")))
fisher.test(Job) # 0.7827
fisher.test(Job, simulate.p.value = TRUE, B = 1e5) # also close to 0.78

## 6th example in Mehta & Patel's JASA paper
MP6 <- rbind(
        c(1,2,2,1,1,0,1),
        c(2,0,0,2,3,0,0),
        c(0,1,1,1,2,7,3),
        c(1,1,2,0,0,0,1),
        c(0,1,1,1,1,0,0))
fisher.test(MP6)
# Exactly the same p-value, as Cochran's conditions are never met:
fisher.test(MP6, hybrid=TRUE)